|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: The
Balkan Crisis
A small breach in US press censorship
By a reporter
29 April 1999
An item which appeared in the Washington Post Wednesday
marks the first report in a major American newspaper of the clause
in the Rambouillet Accords on Kosovo which effectively authorized
a NATO occupation of Serbia. The German press has carried several
reports this month on the previously undisclosed Appendix B of
the accord, but the American media has maintained a wall of silence.
Appendix B includes the following section (FRY is an abbreviation
for Federal Republic of Yugoslavia):
"NATO personnel shall enjoy, together with their vehicles,
vessels, aircraft and equipment, free and unrestricted passage
and unimpeded access throughout the FRY including associated airspace
and territorial waters. This shall include, but not be limited
to, the right of bivouac, maneuver, billet, and utilization of
any areas or facilities as required for support, training, and
operations."
This language made it inconceivable that any government in
Belgrade could accept the Rambouillet pact, since it would have
transformed the entire territory of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia,
not only the province of Kosovo, into a NATO parade ground. This
provision was included by the US government in order to insure
that the government of President Slobodan Milosevic rejected the
agreement and provided a suitable pretext for launching the air
war on Yugoslavia.
The Post's "For the Record" column reproduces
without comment the exchange below between NATO spokesman Jamie
Shea and an unidentified reporter at the National Press Club in
Washington on Monday, April 26.
Q: The Rambouillet Accords, appendix B in
particular ... called for the occupation of all of Yugoslavia....
Unrestricted passage through air space, territorial waters, rail,
airports, roads, bridges, ports without payment, the electromagnetic
spectrum and so on. Was not the Rambouillet accord, which Milosevic
refused to sign, in fact, a desire to occupy all of Yugoslavia
and not simply Kosovo?
Mr. Shea: No, absolutely not.... We were looking
... to be able to deploy an international security force, and
that means, of course, being able to deploy the assets for that
security force.
At the moment, all of our predeployed elements in the former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia have come in by the Greek port
of Thessaloniki. And for that, obviously, one has to have an agreement
with the Yugoslav government to be able to have access to those
roads, those rail systems, the air space for the business of setting
up an international security presence, and therefore NATO personnel
who may have had at the time ... to transit temporarily through
Yugoslavia will have had to enjoy these kinds of immunities....
Q: That's simply not the language, sir. It's
"free and unrestricted passage," the ability to detain
people, for example ... and total use of the electromagnetic spectrum
sir.
A: I was not a negotiator at Rambouillet ...
but my understanding, sir, is that it refers to, as you say, passage,
exactly transit. And that's the point I've made.
Despite Shea's obvious evasion, it is clear that the unidentified
questioner--and many other journalists present in Washington for
the NATO summit--are well aware of the significance of Appendix
B. This document reveals the real purpose of the US/European assault:
the transformation of Yugoslavia into a de facto colony of imperialism.
The press silence on this crucial issue is a blatant example of
the self-censorship of the corporate-controlled mass media.
See Also:
How the Balkan war was prepared
Rambouillet Accord foresaw the occupation of all Yugoslavia
[14 April 1999]
IMF "shock therapy" and the
recolonisation of the Balkans
[17 April 1999]
Blair outlines his vision of the new
military world order
[29 April 1999]
The Munich Agreement and the US-NATO war
against Yugoslavia: The real lessons of appeasement in the 1930s
[23 April 1999]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |