|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Sri
Lanka
Sri Lankan unions divide health workers over the color of
uniforms
By Ajitha Gunarathna and Saman Gunadasa
23 December 1999
Use
this version to print
The leadership of the Public Services United Nurses Union (PSUNU),
the largest nurses union in Sri Lanka, is continuing with a divisive
dispute that has already led to physical clashes between health
workers. The union is demanding that the government withdraw new
uniforms issued to other health employees, including hospital
attendants.
The PSUNU launched the campaign on October 16, calling on nurses
to wear civilian clothes to work to press the Health Minister
to change the new uniforms (white trousers and shirts for males,
and white frocks for females). The union leaders claimed that
the disputed uniforms closely resembled those worn by nurses and
could give rise to confusion among patients. They stipulated that
minor staff uniforms could not be white or blue.
The PSUNU declared a three-hour strike and staged island-wide
protests on November 10, insisting that hospital directors take
disciplinary action against workers who wore the new uniforms.
The Joint Federation of Health Service Trade Unions (JFHSTU)
and the Independent Attendants' Union (IAU) retaliated. They used
the resentment among their members caused by the PSUNU campaign
to deepen divisions. The IAU banned any cooperation between attendants
and nurses and together with a minor staff action committee began
a provocative poster campaign against the nurses.
At the November 10 protest, clashes erupted between nurses
and other hospital employees outside the director's office at
the National Hospital of Sri Lanka in Colombo, resulting in three
nurses being injured.
Following the clashes, the PSUNU was joined by the Government
Nursing Officers Union (GNOU) in staging a nation-wide strike
calling for the arrest of the workers involved in the attack.
In the past the GNOU has always opposed nurses taking industrial
action.
In contrast to earlier actions over working conditions, the
uniform issue did not generate any rank and file enthusiasm. Many
nurses ignored the union direction, continued to wear their uniforms
and did not join the November 10 strike. Only a few attended the
protests. At the National Hospital only 150 out of 1,300 stopped
work.
When the union leaders refused to allow the members to discuss
the issue at general meetings the nurses began confronting union
officials at the workplaces demanding to know why they should
protest against other workers' uniforms. A number of nurses told
World Socialist Web Site reporters that they would not
support any further action on the issue.
On December 1 and 10, the nurses' union issued statements threatening
to take further action if the uniforms of minor staff are not
changed from white to creama compromise finally agreed to
by the unions and hospital authorities.
The conflict comes at a time when nurses and health workers
are facing major attacks on their conditions and a drive by the
People's Alliance government to privatise the public health system.
The dispute is aimed at dividing health workers and diverting
a unified fight against these attacks.
The JFHSTU leaders closed down a struggle for an 18-point log
of claims earlier this year. Ironically the only demand won was
for the issue of new uniforms. Uniforms have been a long-standing
issue for health staff who were forced to wear ordinary sarongs
and saris that were inappropriate for their work.
The Government Health Service Unions Joint Federation, which
was formed on the initiative of the doctors' union, the Government
Medical Officers Association, at first remained silent on the
uniform issue. After the physical clashes between nurses and other
hospital employees it issued a press release. While it criticised
the health ministry and the administration, the statement did
not condemn the reactionary campaign by the PSUNU leaders or the
equally divisive response of the other health unions.
Another notable feature in this shabby episode is the support
extended by the nursing administration to the PSUNU. In the past
the administration has always warned student nurses not to participate
in industrial disputes but this time it encouraged them to join
the protests.
While the PSUNU leadership was quick to call action on the
issue of uniform color, it has opposed any struggle by nurses
to defend essential conditions. Last year the union promised not
to advance any economic demands on the PA government for two years
and has faithfully maintained that agreement. The union has remained
silent on staff shortages, increased workloads, inadequate wages,
worsening working conditions and all the other burning issues
facing nurses.
At the same time, the union has not opposed the Presidential
Task Force (PTF) proposals for health sector reforms aimed at
the privatisation of health services. Yet the union leadership
claims that the uniform issue is essential to "safeguard
the dignity of the nursing profession. In fact it only demonstrates
the contempt that the PSUNU leaders have for other sections of
health workers.
The Health Workers Action Committee (HWAC) and the United Health
Workers Union (UHWU)under the leadership of the Socialist
Equality Party in Sri Lankahave launched a fight to defend
all hospital workers and to defeat the divisive campaign of the
union bureaucrats.
The HWAC, UHWU and SEP have issued a leaflet calling on all
health workers, including nurses and other hospital workers to
organise a unified struggle against the attacks on public health,
jobs and working conditions and to fight for a socialist program
for the health industry.
See Also:
Sri Lankan government cuts funding for
vital drugs in public hospitals
[17 December 1999]
Opposition grows to government
attacks on public health in Sri Lanka
[13 November 1999]
Poor health care for Sri Lankan
tea plantation workers
[8 November 1999]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |