|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
£500 million paid for "vibration white finger"
Labour's compensation deal for British miners not all that
it appears
By Jean Shaoul
2 February 1999
The Labour government is expected to pay up to £2 billion
in compensation to about 140,000 former coal miners suffering
from illnesses caused by their years working down Britain's pits.
An estimated 40,000 former miners suffering from the crippling
condition vibration white finger (VWF)--sometimes known as dead
man's fingers--have won up to £500 million in compensation
in an out-of-court agreement reached with the government. The
claim, launched eight years ago against British Coal, the state-owned
enterprise, and the Conservative government that assumed responsibility
for its liabilities after privatisation, resulted in the longest-running
industrial injury action ever heard in the High Court. It is the
biggest industrial compensation deal ever made.
A further 100,000 miners whose lives have been made a misery
by the effects of bronchitis and emphysema are likely to get about
£1.5 billion in a separate award to be announced shortly.
VWF is a condition triggered by the prolonged use of vibrating
tools. It can damage blood vessels, reducing blood supply, and
also the nerves in the fingers, causing permanent loss of strength
and sensation in the fingers. The bones and muscles may also become
damaged. Sufferers lose their flexibility and strength of grip.
Cold temperatures usually set off symptoms of VWF, so even hobbies
such as swimming, gardening and angling are impossible. An attack
starts with the fingers becoming white and causes numbness, or
pins and needles. The whiteness changes to a deep red flush that
is excruciatingly painful.
The National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) greeted the deal as
settling a very longstanding grievance. The Labour government
described it as "a welcome and fair solution". It also
represents a big cash injection into the devastated mining communities,
dwarfing the £350 million regeneration programme announced
before Christmas.
As Hilda Palmer of the Greater Manchester Hazard Centre, an
organisation concerned with workplace accidents, explained to
the World Socialist Web Site: "It is important to
go into it. It's not simply 'Oh how wonderful'. It raises a whole
number if issues. Lives have been wrecked. They can't pick things
up. They can't do things they used to do."
After nearly eight years of procrastination and foot-dragging
by the government, the first claim for VWF came to court in September
1997. The judge ruled in favour of the miners and laid the onus
on British Coal, the employers, for not taking preventative action
to ensure employees did not suffer VWF since 1975. It found British
Coal negligent in failing to protect its employees.
This was a landmark decision. Compensation was awarded for
physical injury and loss of amenity and employment. The ruling
had implications not just for the coal industry, but all industries
where the use of pneumatic and percussive tools is common because
the damages awarded were much larger than the average previously
paid by employers. The Labour government appealed the decision
in an attempt to reduce the compensation, but the ruling was upheld
in July 1998.
That is why, having lost two cases, the government made an
out-of-court settlement in order to avoid a further ruling that
would have clarified the legal issues, set a precedent and, in
all likelihood, have awarded much higher compensation to the miners.
The National Union of Mineworkers, by accepting the settlement,
has colluded with the government to protect not only the former
British Coal but also all other employers using vibrating equipment.
The compensation means that, typically, a 54-year-old man with
a moderate disability could receive £5,000. A young man
under 45, but suffering severe disability, could receive up to
£18,000. Such a payment, however, means the loss of entitlement
to means tested benefits. An average compensation is likely to
be around £6,000, less than four months wages for an industrial
worker.
Compensation for bronchitis and emphysema has dragged on even
longer, despite court rulings that found British Coal negligent
in failing to take reasonable steps to minimise coal dust, which
had been found to trigger these diseases. Five years ago a leak
of internal government correspondence revealed that discussions
took place between ministers and officials about delaying the
registration of bronchitis and emphysema as an industrial injury
in order to save money, as many ex-miners who may have qualified
died.
The government's announcement that it will pay out £1.5
billion for these respiratory diseases means that the average
payment to those miners still alive will be a measly £10,000
to £15,000 per miner.
This may be the last hurrah for industrial injury compensation.
Even this limited victory for the miners was only possible because
they received Legal Aid. The government is proposing to abolish
Legal Aid for civil cases and replace it with "conditional
fee" arrangements, so-called "no win, no fee".
As the president of the Law Society explained, the cost of medical
and technical evidence alone in the miners' case would have ruled
out a conditional fee arrangement. "Without Legal Aid, this
case may never have come to court at all. The miners suffering
from lung disease as a result of their former employers' negligence
would have had to live without compensation."
Another significant aspect of the compensation deal is that
its size dwarfs the proceeds from privatising British Coal, which
was sold at a bargain basement price to R J Budge Mining. While
RJB got the coal industry with a clean balance sheet, the government
retained the debts and all the liabilities for ill health, subsidence
and environmental damage. But this, in turn, raises questions
as to how this claim is to be paid.
Some ex-miners are under no illusions. They believe it will
be the miners themselves who will pay. When the miners won the
first test case, it was mooted that the government would use the
income stream it gets from the miners' pension fund to pay it.
Roland Birtles is a miner who was made redundant in the early
1970s who is part of a group campaigning for proper pensions for
former British Coal employees. He explained to the World Socialist
Web Site, "The government will use the pension fund built
up through years of miners' contributions. Miners like myself,
who were made redundant after 22 years in the pits, are only getting
£1 a week from the pension fund. I know others who are getting
even less. It's worth £11 billion to 12 billion now and
has generated a £4 billion surplus since 1987. The Exchequer
gets half the surplus every year. That's about £120 million
a year.
"In 1994, a proposed basic pension of £10 a week
was rejected because it would have cost the state £200 million
of the £400 million surplus that it was allowed to remove
at that valuation, 10 percent of what is now on offer.
"I have campaigned for years to get this injustice put
right. The Labour government is just the same as the other lot.
They've no sense of decency. They are withholding money from the
miners that was quite clearly designated and accumulated for pensions.
It means that indirectly the miners will be funding the government's
supposed generosity."
Roland Birtles group can be contacted at http://www.pylon.u-net.com
See Also:
Remaining
9,000 British miners' jobs under threat
[21 July 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |