|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Malaysia
A travesty of justice
Malaysian judge amends charges in Anwar's trial
By Peter Symonds
16 January 1999
The latest twist in the trial of former Malaysian deputy prime
minister Anwar Ibrahim serves to underscore the contrived nature
of the charges against him and the political nature of the case.
In the middle of the trial, the presiding High Court judge Augustine
Paul on Wednesday took the highly unusual step of permitting the
prosecution lawyers to amend the four charges of corruption to
make it far easier for them to prove their case.
Anwar is charged with having used his official position to
direct Special Branch police to force two individuals--Azizan
Abu Bakar, the former driver for Anwar's wife, and Ummi Halfilda
Ali, sister of his former private secretary--to retract their
written accusations of sexual misconduct against him. If convicted,
he faces a jail term of up to 14 years and a fine of 20,000 ringgit
($US5,260) on each charge.
The amended charges now allege that Anwar sought to protect
himself from "embarrassment" rather than "criminal
action or proceedings" and refer to the "allegations"
against Anwar. The apparently minor changes in wording mean that
the prosecution no longer has to prove that there is any truth
in the statements made by Azizan and Ummi, only that Anwar misused
his position by directing the police actions against them.
For weeks lurid accounts of Anwar's alleged sexual activities
have been circulated in the government-run media in an effort
to publicly discredit him. In the trial itself, the prosecution
dramatically produced a soiled mattress in court and a government
forensic expert who claimed that his analysis showed that it had
been used for sexual intercourse between Anwar and Shamsidar Taharin,
the wife of his former private secretary.
Having exploited the sexual scandal to the full, the prosecution
now claims these allegations are not central to their case. Judge
Paul overruled the protests of defence lawyers, allowed the amendments
and then ordered that evidence related to the sexual allegations
be expunged from the court record. As a result, Anwar's defence
team is not permitted to challenge any of the expunged evidence
in court.
The cross-examination of key witnesses over the last month
not only exposed the flimsy character of the sexual accusations
against Anwar but also indicated of the direct involvement of
Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammad and other ministers in the case.
* The driver Azizan alleged that he had been sodomised by Anwar
in 1992, leading to sensational newspaper headlines of him being
a "sex slave". His testimony revealed that for six years
he had made no allegations and continued to visit and maintain
friendly relations with Anwar and his family after leaving their
service. He only made the allegations against Anwar after being
approached by the other accuser Ummi, who was attempting gather
gossip to support her own claims. She drew up his sworn statement
and convinced him to sign it.
On August 24, 1998, just a week before Anwar was sacked, Mahathir
organised a private meeting with Azizan through the director of
the police Special Branch. While details of the meeting remain
sketchy, Mahathir indicated that the police were now going to
investigate his complaint and offered him police protection.
* Ummi is clearly a central figure in the case against Anwar,
having alleged that he had an affair with her brother's wife.
She is a businesswoman who has close connections with the ruling
United Malays National Organisation (UMNO). Her advertising company
has ties with Megat Junid, now domestic trade and consumer affairs
minister, who formerly headed a government agency carrying out
an anti-drug campaign in Malaysian schools. The agency had a five-year
contract with Ummi's company valued between one and two million
ringgit a year.
Ummi met with Mahathir's close political crony Daim Zianuddin
before formally sending her own and Azizan's statements to Mahathir,
Zianuddin and the actress Norzilah Jalil, the wife of Megat Junid.
Ummi also admitted that after Anwar's trial had commenced she
had spoken at a public function alongside two UMNO members--Ghafar
Baba and Tamby Chik--known for their hostility to Anwar.
* Evidence concerning the testing of the mattress cannot now
be challenged by Anwar's defence lawyers in court. But even in
the course of cross-examination, government chemist Lim Kong Boon
cautioned that the forensic evidence was not conclusive, saying:
"I'd like to warn the court that there is such a thing as
a prosecutor's fallacy where DNA is concerned. DNA should not
be the sole foundation for finding a person guilty."
Criminal investigations officer Mohamad Rodwan Mohamad Yusof
said he could not guarantee that the mattress had not been tampered
with. No photographs had been taken when it was seized and it
was kept for four months before being sent for testing. Furthermore
the police had no records as to who had had access to the mattress
during that time.
The amendments to the charges against Anwar come at a crucial
point in the trial, which has now been running for nearly 10 weeks.
The prosecution has presented its evidence and, after hearing
the summations of the opposing sides, the judge is to decide whether
or not Anwar has a case to answer. Judge Paul grudgingly allowed
the defence team an adjournment in order to re-write their statement.
The about-face by the prosecution is undoubtedly connected
not only to the legal weaknesses of their case but also to the
political crisis it has provoked for the government. Mahathir
sacked his deputy last September 2, claiming he was not morally
fit to hold office, and then expelled him from UMNO.
Anwar was only arrested on September 20 after he began to address
large protest rallies and to call for the resignation of Mahathir.
He was held without charge for nine days under the country's draconian
Internal Security Act (ISA) before being taken to court, showing
visible bruising to his face and neck. In addition to the present
four charges, he faces another of corruption and five of sexual
misconduct involving homosexual activity, which is illegal in
Malaysia.
Mahathir initially claimed that Anwar's injuries were self-inflicted.
But facing widespread condemnation, the government was forced
to hold an inquiry into accusations that the police had beat Anwar
unconscious on the first night of his detention. The report and
its conclusions have remained highly confidential for weeks. However,
on January 5, the Attorney-General Mohtar Abdullah publicly admitted
that the police were responsible for Anwar's injuries. Two days
later, police chief Abdul Rahim Noor tendered his resignation.
None of the police involved have been identified.
The trial of Anwar has opened up rifts in the ruling coalition,
which consists of UMNO, the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA),
the Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC) and several smaller parties.
The Gerakan party, a coalition member, publicly criticised the
police for the assault on Anwar. President of the human rights
group Aliran, P. Ramakrishnan, has called on Mahathir and the
attorney general to resign unless "those responsible for
assaulting Anwar" were identified by the end of the month.
At the heart of the break between Mahathir and Anwar were sharp
differences over the economic policies to be pursued in response
to the Asian economic crisis and the slump in the Malaysian economy.
As police witnesses revealed in the course of the trial, the police
only activated the case against Anwar after sharp disagreements
emerged in the course of an UMNO conference last June. On the
day before Mahathir sacked Anwar, the government imposed a series
of currency and capital controls in direct opposition to the IMF's
demands-- backed by Anwar--for a further opening up of the Malaysian
economy.
Despite a purge of Anwar supporters from UMNO, divisions still
exist within the party. Mahathir only filled the vacant position
of deputy prime minister last week, appointing one of his loyal
supporters and long-time Foreign Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.
Mahathir had held off making an appointment as he feared that
to anoint a deputy and therefore likely successor might intensify
moves for his replacement. Mahathir also used the opportunity
to appoint Daim Zainuddin as Finance Minister, a position he had
held himself since firing Anwar from the post.
The longer Anwar's trial has proceeded the more it has become
a focus for opposition to Mahathir both inside and outside the
ruling coalition and the more is at stake for the government in
its outcome. The decision to amend the charges and effectively
quash the rights of the defence team to refute damaging sexual
allegations against Anwar is clearly in response to mounting government
pressure for a conviction.
See Also:
What Anwar
Ibrahim means by "reformasi" in Malaysia
[26 November 1998]
Anwar's trial
backfires on Mahathir
[10 November 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |