|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
$10 billion for "anti-terrorism" plan
Clinton proposes huge police buildup
By Martin McLaughlin
26 January 1999
In a speech January 22 to the National Academy of Sciences,
President Clinton announced a $10 billion plan to strengthen the
repressive powers of the federal government, in the name of waging
war against "terrorism." Combined with $6.6 billion
in new spending on anti-missile systems and a $110 billion increase
in the Pentagon budget over the next six years, the Clinton administration
will launch the biggest military-police buildup since the heyday
of Ronald Reagan.
In both the speech, and an interview given the previous day
to the New York Times, Clinton gave a picture of
America in the twenty-first century beleaguered by terrorists
threatening to kill millions with biological, chemical and nuclear
weapons, or to disrupt the US economy through attacks on its computer-based
infrastructure.
"We must be ready," Clinton declared, "ready
if our adversaries try to use computers to disable power grids,
banking, communications and transportation networks, police, fire
and health services--or military assets ...
"We have to be ready for adversaries to launch attacks
that could paralyze utilities and services across entire regions.
We must be ready if adversaries seek to attack with weapons of
mass destruction, as well. Armed with these weapons, which can
be compact and inexpensive, a small band of terrorists could inflict
tremendous harm."
Clinton boasted that he had tripled FBI anti-terrorist efforts
since 1993, and that last year the administration obtained from
Congress a 39 percent increase in spending for preparedness against
chemical and biological weapons. The new budget will more than
double this effort to nearly $1.4 billion, including $683 million
to train and equip emergency personnel in major cities, $206 million
to protect federal facilities and $381 million for dealing with
"nuclear emergencies."
Another $1.46 billion will be expended on measures to protect
US computer systems from external or internal attack, including
the formation of a "CyberCorps" of computer specialists
working as an arm of the police and military. While Clinton cited
the threat of hackers invading Pentagon and other critical computer
systems, the creation of a specialized detachment of military
and police officers with computer expertise raises an obvious
threat to the present relatively unrestricted access to information
on the Internet.
The bulk of the anti-terrorism funds will be expended on a
massive effort to fortify American embassies around the world,
in the wake of last year's bombing of the Kenyan and Tanzanian
embassies. The effect will be to transform these facilities from
diplomatic missions into essentially military bunkers, outposts
of the American military-intelligence complex in every country
of the world.
Clinton defended his decision to order missile strikes against
the Sudan and Afghanistan in the wake of the African embassy bombings,
although the Sudanese target was a pharmaceutical plant which
produced the bulk of that country's medicine and no connection
has been demonstrated between either target and the bombings.
Future preemptive actions would be taken, he said: "We are
doing everything we can, in ways I can and in ways that I cannot
discuss.... We must be deliberate, and we must be aggressive."
Clinton told the Times that he was considering a proposal
from the Pentagon to restructure the military command through
the appointment of a commander in chief for the defense of the
continental United States--a measure never undertaken even in
World War II or at any time during the Cold War. Such an action
would be the precursor to ending 130-year-old policy, under the
posse comitatus law, which bars the use of American military
forces for internal police purposes.
Just as significant as the measures themselves was the nearly
hysterical language in which Clinton presented the danger of terrorism.
He claimed that the threat of biological and chemical attack "keeps
me awake at night and bothers me." He described the prospect
of such attacks as the greatest threat to US national security
in the twenty-first century, justifying a vast mobilization of
federal resources.
Introducing Clinton to his audience at the NAS, National Security
Advisor Sandy Berger noted the unprecedented scale of the administration's
proposed deployment against the supposed terrorist threat, including
not only the Pentagon, Justice Department and CIA, but the Department
of Energy, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Department
of Transportation (aviation security) and even the Department
of Health and Human Services, which will oversee some of the preparations
against biological warfare.
Richard A. Clarke, recently appointed by Clinton to the new
post of national coordinator of counterterrorism and computer
security programs, warned of the threat of "information warfare"
involving "systematic national intrusion" into computer
systems, with effects comparable to the strategic bombing of World
War II. "What we're concerned about is in the future, nations
will have that same capability to destroy each other's infrastructure,
not by bombs, but by cyber attack," he told reporters.
Clarke admitted that there had been few terrorist attacks on
American soil, adding, "We do not know of any imminent attack
being planned in the United States using chemical or biological
weapons or using cyber attack techniques." Nonetheless, he
justified the massive increase in expenditure by claiming that
the absence of terrorist attacks proved that anti-terrorist programs
were working and should be intensified!
Congressional Republicans voiced their support for Clinton's
initiative, faulting it only for not being even more sweeping.
Thomas Bliley, chairman of the House Commerce Committee, called
for new legislation to tighten control over the use and transfer
of biological and chemical agents, as well as legal and financial
sanctions against persons who "falsely report or conduct
hoaxes regarding biological or chemical attacks--a growing problem
that creates unnecessary panic and fear among this nation's citizens."
This latter proposal, if it were taken literally, would be
justly applied first of all to the Clinton White House, the Pentagon
and the media itself, which have repeatedly raised the specter
of terrorism in order to stampede public opinion in favor of greater
measures of police repression. It remains a fact that the country
with by far the largest arsenal of chemical and biological weapons
is the United States, weapons that have been repeatedly and illegally
tested on American citizens.
Moreover, the bloodiest terrorist attack on American soil came,
not from a foreign country or overseas terrorist group, but from
the homegrown neo-fascist milieu--closely linked to the congressional
Republicans--which produced the Oklahoma City bombers.
See Also:
$110 billion more for Pentagon over six
years:
Clinton to propose biggest military spending boost since Reagan
[5 January 1999]
Clinton's State of the Union address:
a speech in full denial
[21 January 1999]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |