|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Indian
subcontinent
India and Pakistan prepare for a wider war
By Keith Jones
17 June 1999
Use
this version to print
Tensions between India and Pakistan have escalated sharply,
with both countries mobilizing troops along their common border
outside of the disputed Kashmir region and political and military
leaders openly talking of a fourth Indo-Pakistani war.
On Tuesday, Pakistan began evacuating border villages in several
districts of its Punjab Province. India, meanwhile, continues
to pour men and weaponry into the Kargil-Dass-Batalik region of
Indian Kashmir, where a Pakistani-backed force has entrenched
itself on strategic heights over a hundred kilometer bandwidth
of territory several kilometers beyond the Line of Control (LoC)
that divides Indian and Pakistani Kashmir.
Each side is accusing the other of perpetuating the crisis
and risking inciting, if not deliberately provoking, a full-scale
war. Addressing Indian troops in Kargil on Sunday, Indian Prime
Minister Atal Vajpayee said India seeks peace, but is prepared
for war. Pakistani Foreign Office spokesman Tariq Altaf responded
by claiming India has closed all doors to dialogue
and is focusing on military action.
On Tuesday, Indian and Pakistani military leaders traded charges
as to who had initiated troop mobilizations along the Punjab border.
Pakistani Brigadier Rashid Qureshi said Indian troops and planes
have been deployed in a threatening pose. ''Whatever
Pakistan has done is only a minimum defensive move.'' An Indian
army spokesman confirmed Indian troops have taken up new positions,
but insisted the deployments were precautionary and
in response to movement being carried on by the enemy.
Sultan Mehmood, prime minister of the Pakistani province of
Azad [Free] Kashmir, is urging the United Nation's
Security Council to immediately intervene in the crisis so as
to prevent all-out war, which he warns could well involve nuclear
weapons. "If nuclear devices are used in the fourth Pakistan-India
war then this war could spill over to other parts of the world
as well, said Mehmood. Pakistan has long sought to internationalize
its 52-year-old dispute with India over Kashmir, citing India's
failure to comply with UN resolutions from the late 1940s that
called for Kashmir's status to be the subject of a plebiscite.
In recent days, US President Bill Clinton has telephoned both
Vajpayee and his Pakistani counterpart Nawaz Sharif in an attempt
to defuse the crisis. According to White House and Indian government
spokesmen, Clinton has urged the US's longtime ally Pakistan to
withdraw its troops from the Indian side of the LoCa more
or less open endorsement of India's charges that the current intrusion
across the LoC is a Pakistani-organized operation and includes
Pakistani troops, not just Pakistani-supported Kashmiri secessionists
and former Taliban fighters from Afghanistan..
Pakistani Army spokesman Qureshi has responded to the US position
on the LoC by accusing the US of ignorance and bias. Has
the United States ever asked India to respect the LoC? I feel
there is a bias and prejudice against Pakistan.
The US, however, has taken exception to the Indian government's
position that there shall be no further talks between India and
Pakistan until the pro-Pakistani forces retreat across the LoC
or are routed.
Soon after India's May 26 launching of air strikes against
the Kashmir intruders, Pakistan's Foreign Minister
Sartaj Aziz proposed that he come to New Delhi for talks, but
the Indian government repeatedly delayed his visit. Last Saturday,
Aziz was finally accorded an interview with his Indian counterpart,
External Affairs Minister Jaswant Singh. But the Indian government,
bolstered by the US position and increasingly live to the possibilities
of exploiting the Kashmir crisis for both domestic and international
advantage, ratcheted up its anti-Pakistani rhetoric in the days
preceding the visit. Within hours of the peace talks
inevitable failure, Vajpayee convened an all-party
meeting of top political leaders, at which he secured the support
of the opposition, including the Congress and the Stalinist parliamentary
parties, for intensifying the Indian counteroffensive in Kashmir.
If Indian military spokesmen are to believed, Indian forces
are on the verge of driving back the pro-Pakistani force from
threatening the national highway that links Srinagar, the summer
capital of Jammu and Kashmir, with the Ladakh region bordering
China. That objective achieved, there will be little if any strategic
significance in recapturing the inhospitable hilltop positions
that remain in the intruders' hands. For years, Indian
forces have routinely abandoned them with the approach of winter.
But India's political elite, has made it a point of honor that
the entire area must be liberated, whatever the military
and political cost.
A potentially mortal game
The Hindu chauvinist Bharatiya Janata Party, the dominant force
in India's current caretaker government, has historically used
the Kashmir issue to project a militarist image and to accuse
its political opponents in the Congress and on the left of appeasing
Pakistan and coddling India's Muslim minority. (Shyma Prasad Mookerjee,
the founder of the BJP's predecessor [the Jana Sangh], died while
under detention for supporting a 1952-53 agitation against the
special status accorded Jammu and Kashmir under India's constitution.)
Coming as India prepares for a fall election, the outbreak
of fighting in Kashmir presents the BJP withfor those shortsighted
enough to trifle with the threat of nuclear waran apparently
choice opportunity to play the nationalist card and divert popular
attention from its reactionary socioeconomic agenda. The opposition,
for its part, is trying to counter this prospect by competing
with the BJP as to who is the most intransigent enemy of Pakistan.
According to the latest Indian military assessments, it will
take eight to ten weeks to dislodge the intruders
from their strongholds in the forbidding terrain of the Kargil-Dass-Batalik
region. If the Indian forces are able to proclaim victory by early
August, the BJP will undoubtedly make this triumph
pivotal to the launch of its election campaign.
Crass calculations of electoral advantage aside, there are
also geopolitical reasons India's elite may see considerable benefit
in drawing out the current Kashmir crisis. India is far better
positioned to weather a low-scale military confrontation than
is Pakistan. On Monday Indian Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha
boasted that whereas India's economy is strong, Pakistan
is not in a position to sustain the Kargil misadventure.... Pakistan
is dependent on the International Monetary Fund. Sinha then
observed that Pakistan has foreign exchange reserves of $1.8 billion
(as compared with India's $30 billion) and a foreign debt burden
amounting to more than half (53.3 percent) of its national income,
as compared to India's debt load of 23 percent GDP.
Pakistan apparently launched its Kargil operation believing
that India would be loathe to court a wider war now that both
countries have a proven nuclear weapons capability. India has
responded in kind, and so South Asia has been drawn into a game
of brinkmanship. As one commentator observed in the Indian newsmagazine
Frontline, Kargil totally undermines the assumption
that nuclearisation has imparted stability or maturity to India-Pakistan
relations, or reduced the danger of conventional conflict.
Similarly, the belief that such conventional conflicts will inevitably
be contained adds a new, incendiary factor to Indo-Pakistani relations.
Who can say the dogs of war once unleashed will be quickly satiated?
See Also:
Kashmir crisis at the boil
Amid preparations for a new military offensive, India puts
off talks with Pakistan
[7 June 1999]
Fighting escalates in Kashmir
A dangerous confrontation between India and Pakistan
[28 May 1999]
Pakistan
explodes nuclear device
Gathering war clouds in South Asia
[30 May 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |