|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Germany
Justice for forced laborers?
The Deutsche Bank, Auschwitz and German business's compensation
fund
By Marianne Arens
2 March 1999
Following his return from New York two weeks ago German Chancellor
Gerhard Schröder and 12 representatives of prominent German
businesses and banks announced the creation of a foundation for
the compensation of Nazi-time forced labourers. The "joint
declaration" has been supported up to now by Allianz, BASF,
Bayer, BMW, DaimlerChrysler, Deutsche Bank, Degussa-Hüls,
Dresdner Bank, Friedrich-Krupp, Krupp-Hoesch, Hoechst, Siemens
and Volkswagen. More companies are sure to follow.
Schröder stressed with remarkable openness the foundation's
central purpose when he explained on February 16 that the companies
and the German government now expect legal security, meaning that
no German enterprise would have to fear any further collective
action. At stake was "to knock the bottom out of campaigns
aimed against the reputation of our country and our businesses,
thus enabling the German economy to pursue its work unhindered".
This is why in future all demands should be directed to the new
fund and not, however, to the companies that profited from the
forced labour.
For five decades the heads of business had relied on a "biological
solution", i.e., they had speculated on the last of the plaintiffs
dying one day soon, thereby rendering all demands invalid. However,
the decision half a century later to finally compensate the last
living forced labourers for their suffering was not taken on a
voluntary basis, nor was it in response to moral principles.
It is simply a prerequisite for leading German company representatives
to be able to establish business partners and customers on the
global market, especially in the US. The only way to avoid a possible
international boycott was by taking responsibility in a reasonably
plausible way before a world public for the exploitation of millions
during the period of fascist tyranny.
This becomes particularly clear in the case of the Deutsche
Bank and its chairman Rolf-Ernst Breuer. Breuer personally participated
in the goodwill tour to New York organised by Schröder and
his head of the chancellery, Bodo Hombach. The Deutsche Bank had
announced in November its purchase of the American Bankers Trust
for $17.1 billion. Following the merger of Daimler with the US
car giant Chrysler, which had gone off smoothly, the Jewish World
Congress intervened in the case of the Deutsche Bank's merger.
As a precondition for the merger, they demanded compensation for
the atrocities committed during the Third Reich, through which
the bank had gained massive profits.
In the United States there are already several collective suits
pending against the Deutsche Bank and the Dresdner Bank. These
concern above all the so-called "arianisation"--the
dispossession of Jewish citizens and their businesses which took
place, not just in Germany, but in all occupied countries such
as Belgium, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Austria.
The Süddeutsche Zeitung explains this phenomenon
in a February 6 article entitled "The sudden power of history":
"The reason for the suits being treated as an international
priority is that the politicians and the business world neglected
to find a solution for the compensation of forced labourers or
consciously played for time.... Globalisation played its part:
Because, in the meantime, all German companies have subsidiaries
in the important North American market they can be sued there
according to US law."
There are simply too many compromising facts involving detailed
evidence which have come to light over the last months: The Dresdner
Bank traded by the ton with stolen gold from the concentration
camps and ghettos which came from jewellery, gold valuables or
gold teeth; IG Farben and Degussa were involved in the production
of the deadly gas cyclone B which was used in the gas chambers;
Allianz and other insurance companies refused to pay out policies
taken out by Jews; the Siemens company built one of the world's
biggest electrical companies during the "Reich of a Thousand
Years" and made huge profits from the Nazi-program "Destruction
through Work".
In particular the carefully cultivated image of the Deutsche
Bank of recent has been very severely affected. Earlier glossy
brochures about the bank's history always said that especially
in the "period after 1933" the bank exercised restraint,
successfully resisted the Nazis' attempt to undermine the executive,
and despite "a few new acquisitions after 1938" made
"no concessions" to national socialism. The executive's
spokesman Hermann Josef Abs, responsible for all import-export
business, became chancellor Adenauer's financial advisor after
the Second World War and éminence grise of German
business. The town of Frankfurt am Main appointed him honorary
mayor.
However following the first conference between the German business
world and historians in 1997, then a year later the presentation
of a report by a Swiss historians' commission, and finally at
the end of 1998 the foundation of a "Society for European
Business History" in Paris, the Deutsche Bank took the bull
by the horns. It preferred to unravel its history anew rather
than leave it to others.
Historians of the establishment's own archives have now presented
documents which prove the Deutsche Bank contributed towards the
financing of Auschwitz with the full knowledge of its executive.
The Kattowitz subsidiary of the Deutsche Bank gave a loan for
the building of the Buna plant of IG Farben and sites of the Waffen-SS
in Auschwitz.
On February 4, 1999 in Frankfurt the head of the Deutsche Bank's
Historical Institute, Manfred Pohl, explained in detail the lucrative
relations which existed at that time: executive member Hermann
J. Abs was also a member of the board of directors of IG Farben,
the parent company of the Buna plant in Auschwitz. This facility,
built in 1941 in Auschwitz-Monowitz, produced synthetic rubber
and exploited forced labourers who worked for virtually nothing.
The plant kept a current account at the local subsidiary of the
Deutsche Bank, and by the spring of 1943 turnover ran up to 5
million marks a month.
Furthermore there were relations via bank accounts and loans
to the Topf company, which built the crematoriums in Auschwitz.
In addition the bank ran accounts for the Gestapo, which did not
have names but did cite references. Following the plundering of
Jewish property by the Gestapo proceeds from auctions were managed
on these accounts.
The entanglement of the Deutsche Bank in the building of Auschwitz
is commented upon by the Süddeutsche Zeitung: "The
files giving information on this have existed since the time they
were begun. But they have only now been found because someone
bothered to look for them."
The facts were available 50 years ago. In June 1947 a special
commission--the OMGUS (Office of Military Government for Germany,
US)--presented the report of its inquiry into the Deutsche Bank,
the contents of which still give its managers headaches today.
The OMGUS inquiry group, the "Deutsche Bank Team",
was attached to the finance ministry headed by Henry Morgenthau
and comprised Jewish German emigrants, American experts in public
finance and historians. A few months after the fascist defeat
in 1945 it was possible for this group to conduct research relatively
freely in Germany while the Nuremberg Trials were being prepared.
Its most prominent patron, the American finance minister Morgenthau,
advocated the plan of demilitarising Germany, dismantling the
iron, coal and steel industries' plants and breaking up the big
banks and industrial companies.
The OMGUS report then faded into oblivion in 1947 after the
Truman administration in the US had replaced Roosevelt and the
rebuilding of Germany became an important factor in the Cold War.
The report of the Deutsche Bank Team "proved that the
leaders of this bank giant had the closest political connections
to the Third Reich's centre of power" and leading members
of the executive of the Deutsche Bank such as Emil G. von Stauß,
Philipp Reemtsma, Carl Friedrich von Siemens and Albert Pietsch
had already been financing Hitler long before his take-over. The
report brings to light the mechanism through which the bank controlled
the financial network in the Reich's territory and also exercised
control over industry. It showed the role played by the bank in
rearmament and war preparations and how it advanced the "arianisation
of the business world" from which it made enormous profits.
The report proved how the bank's import-export business developed
and how closely its world-wide operations were co-ordinated with
the annexation programs of the "Third Reich".
A special chapter dealt with the exploitation of forced labourers,
concentration camp prisoners and prisoners of war through the
joint stock companies which the Deutsche Bank controlled, amongst
them the Mannesmann-Röhrenwerke, the Bayrische Motoren-Werke
(BMW), Daimler-Benz or Siemens.
The essence of the report was summarised in the following recommendations
that were, however, no longer of official interest after 1947:
"It is recommended that:
1.
The Deutsche Bank be wound up;
2. 3.
The employees of the Deutsche Bank responsible be charged and
tried as criminals of war before a court;
4. 5.
The leading employees of the Deutsche Bank be excluded from
important or responsible posts in Germany's economical and political
life" (OMGUS investigation against the Deutsche Bank, Nördlingen,
1985).
6.
No wonder that current heads of the bank and the industrial
magnates are desperately seeking to put a cap on their history
as quickly as possible.
Whether this compensation for the forced labourers still alive
is the best solution is an open question. Particularly in Eastern
Europe, hundreds of thousands of former work slaves of the Nazis
are still alive. In the Baltic region, in Poland, Russia, the
Czech Republic, Hungary and the Ukraine there are at least a million
people who until today have only received a pittance (approximately
500 marks per person, according to the compensation law of 1993)
or no compensation at all. From the very beginning they were excluded
from the talks over the planned foundation.
The compensation fund now planned does include for the first
time a declaration of intent declaring that "nationality
and religion" would play no role in the way money is distributed.
However, for the victims there are no guarantees of legal security
against future claims such as that demanded by the leaders of
the banks and industry.
See Also:
Blood money:
two exposés of Swiss collaboration with the Nazis
[30 May 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |