|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Science
& Technology : Evolution
New fossil find provides important clues to man's prehistory
By Frank Gaglioti
5 May 1999
The April 23 issue of the Science magazine announced
the discovery of the fossilised remains of a new species of hominid
[human ancestor], which provides important clues into the early
history of human beings. The find was made by a multinational
team of scientists headed by Ethiopian anthropologist Dr. Berhane
Asfaw.
The new species was originally discovered in 1996 in the Afar
depression in eastern Ethiopia on the edge of the Horn of Africa.
But it has taken three years to fully explore and reveal the potential
of the site. The species, which has been named Australopithecus
garhi, was identified by a skullcap and an upper jaw with
teeth. The Berkley Geochronology Center used the argon-argon radioisotopic
method to date the fossil at 2.5 million years old.
The latest discovery has features that are intermediate between
Homo habilis, the earliest true human and Australopithecus
afarensis, best known from the fossil "Lucy"--also
discovered in the Afar region that gives the species its name.
A. garhi's teeth are much bigger than those in A. afarensis,
placing A. garhi closer to true humans; but its cranial
structure has features similar to those found in "Lucy".
Professor Tim White, from University of California, Berkley described
the new species as being "most like its ancestor afarensis--the
face projects forward, the brain case is crested and small, but
the premolars and molars are enormous. This combination of features
has never been seen before, and that's why we named a new species."
The scientific team also reported the discovery of a thighbone
and forearm of an individual which was 1.2 metres tall, from a
similar period but which could not be positively identified as
the same species. The thighbone showed there had been an elongation
from Australopithecus closer to the proportions of modern humans,
while the forearm was still elongated as in its Australopithecus
forebears.
Although the A. garhi fossil has intermediate features
and lived in a period between "Lucy"--3.3 million years
ago and Homo habilis --1.9 million years ago, the scientists
have not claimed that it represents a direct descendent of Homo
even though it represents a promising candidate. The report states:
"It is in the right place, at the right time, to be the ancestor
of early Homo, however defined. Nothing about its morphology would
preclude it from occupying this position."
In an accompanying paper, the team of scientists reported the
nearby discovery of fossilised limb bones of antelopes, horses
and other large mammals showing cut marks. Some of the bones had
been bashed open by hammer stones to extract the marrow--clear
signs of butchery, but the tools used to butcher the animals were
not found. Although these fossils date from the same period and
were found only one meter from the A. garhi skull, the
evidence of butchery has not been definitively linked with A.
garhi. It is the most likely candidate, nevertheless.
The current findings give a tantalising glimpse into the lifestyle
of the creature that wielded the earliest stone tools. Archaeologist
Sileshi Semaw from Indiana University discovered tools aged 2.5
million years old just north of the site of the current discovery
two years ago-- A. garhi provides a possible user.
The discovery will reinvigorate the ongoing controversy over
which hominid first used such primitive tools-- Homo habilis
or an Australopithecus species. The famous paleoanthropologist,
Mary Leakey originally named the tools of this period "Oldowan"
after the Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania in 1971 where she first discovered
such tools with bone fragments with cut marks, possibly indicating
butchery. Prior to the latest find, "Oldowan" tools
were always found in close association with the fossils of both
Homo and Australopithecus together, making it impossible to tell
which had used the tools.
The latest find provides evidence that by 2.5 million years
ago human ancestors had developed the ability to manufacture and
master certain tools such as stone knives and the ability to obtain
meat and marrow, marking a pivotal period in human evolution that
enabled hominids to exploit a high quality food resource. Professor
White described the evolutionary significance of this breakthrough
as "the development of stone tool technology allowed this
dietary revolution. This is the earliest evidence of a key adaptation
that let our ancestors spread beyond Africa."
Drawing on the scientific work of his day, Fredrick Engels
brilliantly anticipated the current discoveries in his famous
pamphlet The Part Played by Labour in the Transition from Ape
to Man where he explained the significance of a meat diet.
He wrote that "the meat diet ...had its greatest effect on
the brain, which now received a far richer flow of the materials
necessary for its nourishment and development, and which, therefore,
could develop more rapidly and perfectly from generation to generation."
The development of a meat diet led to two further advances: the
domestication of animals and the mastery of fire. Engels went
on "just as man learned to consume everything edible, he
also learned to live in any climate. He spread over the whole
of the habitable world, being the only animal fully able to do
so of its own accord."
It is interesting to note that while the brain capacity of
A. garhi is similar to that of A. afarensis at 450
cubic centimetres (ccs), Homo habilis has a brain capacity
of 650 ccs--a 200 ccs increase in about half a million years while
the proceeding period of 800, 000 years from A. afarensis
to A. garhi saw no increase in brain capacity. The findings
are thus direct evidence that the development of the brain may
indeed have been related to the new diet.
The anthropological community has welcomed the discovery. Philip
Rightmire at State University of New York in Binghampton stated
that the researchers "have made a convincing case for naming
the new species" and "with the addition of this to the
inventory, there are more species than one can shake a stick at.
Now it will be a real challenge to sort them out and put them
into a coherent evolutionary scheme". Donald C. Johanson
of the University of Arizona who discovered "Lucy" stated
that "it is a very welcome discovery. [The new species] was
not only anatomically different but behaviorally different. It
is tantalising material. The whole human family tree is more complex
than we have thought before."
See Also:
A highly
significant discovery
Oldest human-like fossil uncovered in South Africa
[30 December 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |