|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: The
Balkan Crisis
Observer newspaper targets playwright Harold Pinter
for his criticism of NATO
By Julie Hyland
20 May 1999
Over the past three months, Britain's liberal media
has proved to be NATO's most vociferous champion. Most notably,
the Guardian and the Observer never tire of promoting
the aerial bombardment of Serbia and the Labour government's demand
for ground troops. Following Prime Minister Blair's lead, they
justify their support on the grounds of humanitarian principles.
Maintaining this moral posture has become increasingly difficult,
however. Daily NATO airstrikes have obliterated three times more
civilians than the number of Kosovans estimated killed each day
in the months prior to the bombing. TV stations, hospitals, clinics,
nurseries and schools have all been strafed and bombed, in some
cases repeatedly. Even Kosovan refugees have been targeted by
NATO's military planners.
As Blair's hawkish strategy becomes stuck in the
quagmire of conflicting US-European interests, and public criticism
of NATO's action mounts, the liberal media is rounding against
left-wing opponents of the war with undisguised venom.
Observer columnist Jay Rayner singled out one such critic,
the playwright Harold Pinter, for a particularly spiteful comment
last Sunday. Rayner's pen poured out her scorn: Hated Pinochet;
loathed Thatcher; doesn't like America; deplores NATO; is disgusted
when his play doesn't get a West End run. Good old Haroldhe's
always bitching about something.
Rayner began her piece by commenting on the playwright's objection
to the decision by Gielgud Theatre in London's West End not to
run the play The Late Middle Classes that he directed,
despite its successful regional tour. Pinter has protested that
the decision is a disgrace to me, the production and to
the English theatre.
Almost exactly 26 years ago, Pinter had made headlines
for protesting against a local production of his play, Old
Times, at Italy's Teatro di Roma, Rayner noted. Then he had
been complaining that the production contained grave and
shocking distortions. Now he makes headlines for raging
against the way a play isn't produced. The sound and the fury,
rather than the work, is what grabs our attention. Late Pinter
is all about sound and fury.
Rayner's article did not explore the reasons for the Gielgud
Theatre's actions. Instead her allusion to Shakespeare implies
that Pinter's sound and fury signifies nothing. The
remainder of her comment consists of an extended diatribe against
Pinter's record of political activism. She wrote, In the
last few months, we have been treated to Pinter on Newsnight growling
dark and furious at judicial hold-ups over the proposed extradition
to Spain of General Pinochet. Then there have been those outraged
letters to the press. 'US foreign policy can be defined as follows,'
he wrote recently to the Guardian, subtly framing his analysis
of Clinton: 'Kiss my arse or I'll kick your head in.' A few days
ago, he presented Counterblast on BBC2, once more attacking NATO's
bombing of Serbia.
In his well-researched and powerful "Counterblast"
presentation, Pinter showed how the media were functioning as
an essential part of the NATO war drive, and exposed the fraudulent
character of its humanitarianism. Jake Lynch of Sky
News detailed how NATO had withheld the cockpit video evidence
of its bombing of a refugee convoy, in order to create the maximum
confusion. Pinter explained that whilst NATO had, rightly, described
the murder of an anti-Milosovic journalist as a brutal action
of repression, they had never expressed any regret for the killing
of civilians working in the Serbian TV station they bombed. "Both
are ugly murders of human beings who propagate words or images
that somebody else doesn't like," Pinter argued.
NATO's moral authority was based on bombs
and power, he went on. Whilst the US claims its intervention
into the Balkans is dictated by humanitarian concerns, it had
supplied Turkey with the jets used to bomb Kurdish villages. 1.4
million Kurds fled Turkish repression from 1990 to 1994. Yet Turkey
is invited to the top of the table at NATO's birthday party."
The US had also been complicit in greatest single act of displacement
and ethnic cleansing in the entire Yugoslav warthe expulsion
of 200,000 Serbs from Croatia in 1995. The war had also exposed
Blair's real character, he went on, There's nothing like
a missile, there's nothing like power, it was really worth waiting
for!"
Rayner implied that the playwright encountered difficulties
in the dramatic field due to his political stance. Pinter's basic
problem was not only that he had not discarded the principles
of his youth, but that he was still prepared to defend them publicly,
she opined. In 1948, Pinter declared himself a conscientious objector
and refused to do National Service. He ended up in court for his
beliefs and was fined £80, which his father had to pay.
The dust had hardly settled on the last war, he has
said, It seemed preposterous that they should be preparing
us for the next. He has also described how he knocked a
man out for making virulently anti-Semitic remarks in a bar, when
he was 28.
Things would have been fine if these episodes of dissent
had been reserved for the private world, Rayner concludes.
But Pinter, the professional activist, is only too
ready to pick a public fight for his beliefs, as he did
in that bar so long ago. His writing has faded into the background
.. replaced by the causes to which he has been eager to dedicate
himself.
What accounts for such cynicism? In the first instance, Rayners
allegation that late Pinter is a triumph of form
over style; an activist who has forgotten
his art, simply does not hold water. Pinter remains, as she admits,
one of the most respected post-war playwrights in Britain. His
dramas are a serious study of various social mores in Britain.
Many of his plays were regarded as breaking new ground in the
1960s. Since then, Pinter has also written a number of screenplays,
including, The French Lieutenant's Woman (1981), Betrayal
(1982), Turtle Diary (1985), Reunion (1989),
The Handmaid's Tale (1990), The Comfort of Strangers
(1990), and The Trial (1990).
His direction of The Late Middle Classes won critical
acclaim, as has his own play The Birthday Party, which
is currently showing in the West End. Indeed Rayner's comment
infers that the decision not to run The Late Middle Classes
was taken on political, not artistic grounds. In the past the
Observer would have reacted with outrage against even the
hint of such censorship.
Not today, however. Rayner's bile is reserved for those who
have not learnt the lesson that in order to get ahead, one should
keep quiet. Pinter's problem, she concludes, is that criticism
is unlikely to shut him up. If past form is
anything to go by, he'll just start shouting louder.
Rayner articulates the social outlook of the former liberal
and pacifist milieu that has done precisely that: jettisoned the
ideological baggage of their youth in return for the trappings
of success. In their editorial offices, lecture halls
and various policy centres they justify their accommodation to
imperialist aggression and social inequality on the grounds of
their new-found realism. To these layers, Pinter represents
an uncomfortable living reminder of their own moral and political
turpitude. But that is Rayner's problemnot Pinter's.
See Also:
Playwright Harold Pinter presents a powerful
case in opposition to NATO bombardment of Serbia
[7 May 1999]
War in
the Balkans
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Harold Pinter: We are bandits, guilty of murder Counterblast
programme, screened on BBC2, May 4 1999, 19:30 GMT
This can be viewed in Microsoft ASF streaming video format
at:
http://www.zoran.net/afp/pinter/harold.htm
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |