|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Pakistan
Pakistan's military regime prepares IMF program
By Vilani Peris
25 November 1999
Use
this version to print
Shaukat Aziz, the Pakistani military regime's finance minister,
says he is reviewing an International Monetary Fund program for
the country and having discussions with the business sector on
ways and means to implement it.
As soon as the leader of the military coup, General Pervaize
Musharraf, appointed Aziz, an executive of the US-based Citibank,
the finance minister flew to New York. After meeting IMF officials
on October 29, Aziz said the talks were very positive."
He said he had to return to Pakistan and "review what programs
the IMF has proposed" before initiating further discussions.
According to reports, he also met various investment bankers and
executives of US companies while in New York.
It seems that the IMF officials may have informed the minister
of the conditions it had insisted on with the former Nawaz Sharif
government. General Musharraf had already indicated his desire
to satisfy the IMF. In his policy statement on October 17 he promised
measures to rebuild investor confidence, increase domestic savings,
make state enterprises profitable and ensure austerity.
Squashing speculation that the IMF would impose sanctions on
the military junta, an official said the institution was not "politically
motivated" and "it would not have a problem with the
nature of government in Pakistan". In fact, the IMF had no
small role in the events that led to the ousting of Nawaz Sharif.
Displeased by the Benazir Bhutto government's inability to
implement its recommendations, the IMF welcomed the Nawaz Sharif
government when it came to power in March 1997. In October that
year, the IMF approved a three-year financing package for Pakistan
equivalent to $US1,588 million in support of a medium-term adjustment
and reform program. It required tightened control of government
expenditure, fundamental changes to the tax administration machinery
and an expansion of the net of the general sales tax (GST) and
the agricultural tax.
The resulting government spending cuts affected the poverty-stricken
masses, and small entrepreneurs opposed the GST and agricultural
taxes. With the blessing of government, landlords escaped from
the tax net. The IMF then withheld the loan.
Following its nuclear tests in late May 1998, the Sharif government
faced US-led sanctions. Following suit, the IMF suspended its
loan facility. The sanctions magnified Pakistan's socio-economic
difficulties, emptying government coffers, pushing the country
to the brink of defaulting on foreign loans and worsening conditions
for the poor.
When US wheat growers lobbied the Clinton administration, it
waived sanctions on the export of agricultural products from US
to Pakistan. Only then did the IMF and World Bank agree to advance
credit to the Sharif government.
On January 14 this year, the IMF revived its loan under the
Enhanced Structural Facility (ESF). Pakistani authorities prepared
policy framework papers for IMF and World Bank officials. The
main terms were as follows: An increase of the GST to 15 percent
(from 12.5 percent); extension of the tax into other areas; enhancement
of the tax on petroleum products; reduction in unproductive expenditure;
strengthening the financial position of the Water and Power Development
Agency (WAPDA) and Karachi Electricity Sales Company (KESC)both
state-owned enterprises; reduction of the subsidy on wheat; and
reduced non-interest current expenditure.
Even though the Sharif regime was eager to implement the package,
a political crisis and socially explosive conditions did not allow
it to do so. In May this year the IMF management released a meagre
sum of $US51 million to the country.
When the Sharif government prepared its budget for July 1999
to June 2000, an IMF team was in Islamabad to ensure its recommendations
were included in the budget paper. According to the Dawn newspaper,
the visiting mission head to Pakistan told the finance minister
Isaq Dar he had no option but to go for the new VAT (GST)
on the service sector". The News reported, "The
finalisation of the budget took place after intense discussions
with the international financial institutions, chiefly the IMF".
But when the budget was presented, the regime backed away from
the IMF proposals on taxes, fearing opposition, not only from
the poor but small traders as well.
In the aftermath of the Kashmir conflict with Indiawhen
US administration forced Sharif to withdraw the Pakistani-backed
forces from Kargil heightsopposition parties launched a
campaign demanding Sharif's resignation. In a desperate bid to
head off mass support for the opposition campaign, Sharif pretended
that he was concerned about the plight of the people. He launched
a mega-housing project with much fanfare.
When Sharif's finance minister visited New York in July to
plead with the IMF for a withheld loan tranche of $280 million,
he was sent back empty-handed, with instructions to stop the housing
project and implement the GST. The cash-strapped cabinet then
decided to impose the 15 percent GST. The small traders, with
the help of opposition parties, launched a strike that shut down
the whole country on September 4. Sharif immediately met representatives
of the small traders and promised to reduce the tax to a nominal
0.75 percent.
On September 11, Dawn reported that "IMF officials
have been privately saying that they would need a firm and unequivocal
commitment by the Nawaz Sharif government at the highest level"
to implement its conditions, mainly the 15 percent tax.
The IMF intervention contributed to economic collapses, ignited
socially explosive conditions and added to the political destabilisation
in Pakistan. It was no surprise that the military exploited the
situation to grab power. Now the new regime is preparing to implement
the IMF conditions while tightening its grip in the country by
launching a so-called anti-corruption drive to distract popular
attention. The All-Pakistani Organisation of Traders and Cottage
Industries has warned that it will initiate a countrywide indefinite
strike if the regime implements the GST.
IMF intervention to secure an "open economic policy"
in Pakistan started in 1988 at the end of military dictator Zia
Ul Haq's tenure. The US State Department, evaluating the program,
wrote in a report in November 1997: "Market-based reform
began to take hold in 1988, when the government launched an IMF-assisted
structural adjustment program in response to chronic and unsustainable
fiscal and external account deficits." It praised the removal
of barriers to foreign trade and investment, reform of the financial
system, relaxed exchange controls and the privatisation of dozen
of state-owned enterprises.
None of Pakistan's economic ills have been healed, however.
Instead, they have been aggravated by the IMF interventions. The
promised prosperity has not arrived. An IMF report, while sketching
the failure of its structural adjustment program, demanded more
of the same policy: "The authorities intensified their efforts
in 1993, with IMF support but by 1995 the situation deteriorated
again. The report blamed "loose monetary policy"
and weather conditions. The IMF admitted that the trade deficit
had widened, external reserves declined, and inflation remained
"stubbornly high.
A recent UN-sponsored Human Development in South Asia 1999
report analysing the impact of the IMF's measures referred to
"worsening poverty and income inequality in the wake of structural
adjustment programs. Programs have hurt the poor in Pakistan,
since the real incomes of lowest groups have declined by nearly
52 percent since the [IMF] adjustment."
See Also:
Pakistani political elite supports military
regime
[17 November 1999]
Pakistan's military regime
to implement IMF dictates
[30 October 1999]
Pakistan
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |