|
WSWS : History
Nazism and the myth of the "master-race"
Britain's Channel Four Secret History documentary on
"Hitler's search for the Holy Grail"
By Peter Reydt
23 September 1999
Use
this version to print
Britain's Channel Four television recently broadcast the documentary
Hitler's search for the Holy Grail as part of its
Secret History series. Heinrich Himmler, head of the SS,
was the chief driving force in developing the nationalist and
racist myths advanced by the Nazis. The documentary showed how
he was able to recruit broad layers of leading academics in pursuance
of this aim.
When Himmler joined the Nazi Party in 1925, he was already
a member of the Thule society, which believed in the greatness
of German history, reaching back to the year 9AD, when the Teutonic
tribes defeated the Roman army. It promoted the superiority of
the Aryan race, an ancient northern European people.
These ideas formed the basis of Nazi racial philosophy that
was to have such an impact on history. The programme's commentatorBritish
historian Michael Woodexplained that, when the Nazi Party
took power, Himmler sought to create an Aryan knighthood in the
shape of the SS. Originally founded as Hitler's bodyguards, the
SS had grown rapidly. By 1939, it was 300,000 strong. Its members
would run the concentration camps and take charge of the deportations
of Jews. It became the standard bearer of racial purity
within Germany and in the campaign directed especially against
the peoples in the East.
The centre of this new order of knights, an "aristocracy
of soul and blood", was the Wewelsburg castle. This was Himmler's
Camelot, with SS commanders cast as the Knights of
the Round Table. Rooms were dedicated to figures of Nordic history
and mythology like King Arthur. Himmler's room was dedicated to
King Heinrich I, founder of the first German Reich (empire). Himmler
believed himself to be the reincarnation of Heinrich. Another
room was set aside to house the Holy Grail, which was to be searched
for all over the world.
The director of the Wewelsburg museum, Wulff Brebeck, explained
that Himmler's goal was to "create a focus point of all the
aspirations he had towards religion, towards science, forming
a new policy.
To this end, Himmler set out to re-establish an ancient Aryan
religion within Germany in opposition to Christianity, as a basis
for Nazi ideology. Himmler maintained that many sacred symbols
had been stolen from a more ancient Aryan religion and set out
to restore them. One such symbol was the Holy Grail. One leading
academic recruited to the Nazi cause was Otto Rahn, the leading
German authority on the Holy Grail. He was brought into the SS
to lead the search for it the world over.
Dr. Henning Hassmann of the Archaeological Institute in Dresden
explained: Himmler saw the potential of archaeology as a
political tool. He needed archaeology to provide an identity for
his SS. But Himmler also believed that archaeology had a certain
pseudo-religious content. There were excavations; there were myths
and legends, a feeling of superiority. They believed by drawing
on the power of prehistory they would achieve success in the present
day.
In 1935, Himmler established a new arm of the SS, Das Ahnenerbe
(the Ancestral Heritage Society). It was staffed by high-profile
academics and headed by the Nazi Wolfram Sievers. Of the 46 heads
of departments, 19 were professors and another 19 held doctorates.
Amongst them were such eminent figures as Walter Wust, a leading
expert on India; Ernst Schaefer, a veteran explorer; and Walter
Jankuhn, an archaeologist.
Through these academics the Nazis sought to lend their propaganda
the status of objective truth. The Ahnenerbe organised
expeditions into many parts of the worldto Iceland in search
of the Grail, to Iran to find evidence of ancient kings of pure
Aryan blood, to the Canary Islands to seek proof of Atlantis.
In April 1938 the SS undertook its biggest and most ambitious
expedition to Tibet, led by Schaefer and the anthropologist Bruno
Beger. Film shot during the expedition shows Beger and others
measuring the bodies of the Tibetan people and producing facemasks.
Beger believed that the proportions of the human body were vital
indicators of race and that "one could determine the moral
and intellectual capacities through the shape of the skull",
Michael Wood explained.
On 10 March 1937, SS officers gathered in Munich to listen
to a lecture by Professor Wust, with the title " Mein
Kampf as the mirror of the Aryan worldview. In it, Wust
claims a similarity between the words of the Führer
and those of that other great Aryan personality, the Buddha ...
the basic idea of racial identity and the sacred concept of ancestral
heritage.
With the beginning of the war, the role played by Ahnenerbe
became more sinister. It took on a grandiose scale. Entire contents
of museums, scientific collections, libraries and archaeological
finds were looted and shipped to Berlin or the Wewelsburg. Himmler
and Sievers created a special unitthe "Sonderkommando
Jankuhn"to supervise the plunder. Professors, doctors
and scholars were now directly integrated into the Nazi murder
machine.
In October 1941 Sievers bought Ernst Schaefer to Dachau to
photograph experiments on inmates carried out by the Luftwaffe
medical officer, Rascher. One witness at the Nuremberg trials
described the content of these experiments. Prisoners would be
exposed to extreme vacuum pressures until their lungs exploded
or extreme pain made them tear out their hair, bang their heads
against the wall or maim their faces with their fingernails. These
experiments usually ended in death.
The documentary shows the interrogation of Sievers at Nuremberg.
He was asked about his role in the collection of skeletons for
Professor Hirt at Strasbourg University. Jews held in Dachau concentration
camp were selected while still alive to provide specimens. In
a letter from Sievers to Himmler's adjutant Dr. Brandt, he set
out how a Jew's head was to be severed from his body after he
was killed and placed in conserving fluid. This was then to be
sent directly to Hirt. Wood makes the point that the activities
of the Ahnenerbe in Dachau and Auschwitz show the direct
connection between their racial theories and fascist atrocities.
Scholars involved in the Ahnenerbe research claimed
that their sole interest was the development of their specific
field of study. But evidence shows they knew of, and were complicit
in, the Nazis' crimes against humanity. They were SS officers
in uniform and participated in close discussions within the council
of Ahnenerbe, while scientists who would not go along with
the Nazis were ostracised and victimised.
In the programme, Dr. Henning Hassmann asked whether it was
acceptable for historians, archaeologists and anthropologists
to utilise the opportunities they saw opened up during the Third
Reich in order to further their scientific research. The posing
of such a question regarding those who prostituted their science
in the service of the Nazis points to a fundamental weakness of
the documentary. Hitler's nationalism and racism was aimed at
assembling a social force that could be used as a battering ram
against Germany's powerful socialist working class. At the same
time, theories of racial superiority served the interests of the
ruling class in obtaining control of territories and markets,
especially in the East, to overcome the restrictions laid on Germany
after its defeat in the First World War.
Leon Trotsky wrote the following in his article What
is National Socialism? in June 1933:
The petty bourgeois is hostile to the idea of development,
for development goes immutably against him; progress has brought
him nothing except irredeemable debts. National Socialism rejects
not only Marxism but Darwinism. The Nazis curse materialism because
the victories of technology over nature have signified the triumph
of large capital over small. The leaders of the movement are liquidating
intellectualism' because they themselves possess second-
and third-rate intellects, and above all because their historic
role does not permit them to pursue a single thought to its conclusion.
The petty bourgeois needs a higher authority, which stands above
matter and above history, and which is safeguarded from competition,
inflation, crisis and the auction block. To evolution, materialist
thought and rationalismof the twentieth, nineteenth, and
eighteenth centuriesis counterposed in his mind national
idealism as the source of heroic inspiration. Hitler's nation
is the mythological shadow of the petty bourgeoisie itself, a
pathetic delirium of a thousand-year Reich.
Trotsky also explained why the Nazis were able to recruit substantial
layers of academics to their cause: The immense poverty
of national socialist philosophy did not, of course, hinder the
academic sciences from entering Hitler's wake with all sails unfurled,
once his victory was sufficiently plain. For the majority of the
professorial rabble, the years of the Weimar regime were periods
of riot and alarm. Historians, economists, and philosophers were
lost in guesswork as to which of the contending criteria of truth
was right, that is, which camp would turn out in the end the master
of the situation. The fascist dictatorship eliminates the doubts
of the Fausts and the vacillation of the Hamlets of the university
rostrums. Coming out of the twilight of parliamentary relativity,
knowledge once again enters into the kingdom of absolutes.
In the Secret History documentary, Professor Colin Renfrew
of the University of Cambridge touched on another fundamental
issue. What had to be laid at the door of archaeologists and anthropologists,
he said, was that "at the end of the Second World War, they
didn't sort out the issues of ethnicity. The holocaust was so
ghastly that they walked away from the issue and didn't analyse
it carefully. That ethnicity, the notion of who a people is, is
very much what a people wants to be and is not to be demonstrated
or proved from something deep in prehistory.... Archaeologists
were very late in saying this and have only been saying it very
recently. Academics did not grasp the nettle with sufficient vigour."
There is truth in Renfrew's assertion. Most important from
this standpoint is the re-emergence over the last period of theories
that use ethnic criteria as a tool of historical analysis.
In all spheres of life within the post-war German state system,
there was no real reckoning with former Nazi stooges. Judges,
high ranking policemen, army officers, doctors, psychiatrists
and politicians all assumed leading and respected positions in
the state apparatus of the Federal Republic of Germany and, on
a smaller scale, the German Democratic Republic. Things were no
different regarding members of the Ahnenerbe. All became
important scholars in post-war Germanywith the exception
of Sievers who was sentenced to death at the Nuremberg trials.
Any trace of their role in the SS murder machine was basically
expunged.
The writer of this review had the opportunity to speak to a
British archaeologist who, while visiting Germany as a student
in the 1970s, met Jankuhnwho had supervised the Nazis' archaeological
plunder. Although everybody knew about his past, Jankuhn continued
to enjoy the reputation and lifestyle of a well-respected academic.
His book on the early medieval site at Hedeby, or Haithbu, in
North Germany is still regarded as a standard work.
See Also:
Hitler's
search for the Holy Grail
[from Channel Four Television's Secret History web site]
http://www.channel4.com/nextstep/secret_history/grail1.html
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |