|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Prosecutions over Australian mine disaster fail to address
underlying safety issues
By Terry Cook
26 April 2000
Use
this version to print
Two years after a judicial inquiry into the deaths of four
miners at the Gretley coal mine, the government in the Australian
state of New South Wales has begun prosecuting the mine operator
Newcastle Wallsend Coal Company, its parent company Oakbridge
Pty Ltd and several of its managerial staff.
The four menJohn Hunter, 36, Edward Batterham, 48, Mark
Kaiser, 29, and Damon Murray, 19were killed on November
14, 1996, when the mining machine they were operating cut into
an adjacent disused mine shaft that was filled with water. They
had no way of escaping the powerful inrush of water and were drowned.
Mine managers Richard Porteous and John Erik Romcke, undermanagers
Terence Shacklady, Michael Francis Alston, Philip John Pritchard,
Christopher Nicholls and Michael Coffey, and miner surveyor Mark
Robinson appeared before the NSW Industrial Relations Commission
on April 17 and were charged with breaching the Occupational Health
and Safety Act. The hearing was adjourned until July 18.
Even if found guilty, the men only face fines and the loss
of their mining licenses. The company could also be fined. The
government has not brought criminal charges despite evidence at
the previous inquiry showing that a series of company decisions
had severely compromised safety in the mine and led directly to
the disaster which claimed the four lives.
Justice James Staunton, the presiding judge at the inquiry,
had let the government off the hook when he recommended that no
criminal charges be brought and referred the evidence to the Crown
Solicitor to determine if the company should be prosecuted under
the provisions of the Occupation Health and Safety Act.
In his findings, however, Staunton was compelled to admit that
there was evidence of widespread and serious shortcomings
at every level of management of the Newcastle Coal Companya
subsidiary of the US-based Oakbridge Pty Ltd. He cited management
for:
* Ignoring reports from a mine deputy on three separate occasions
in the two weeks before the disaster indicating there was a considerable
amount of water at the coal face.
* Not undertaking a risk analysis even though it
was aware of the presence of abandoned water-filled mines in the
area.
* Refusing to carry out forward drilling or to sink bores to
determine the exact whereabouts of the deserted Young Wallsend
Mine that produced the fatal torrent of water.
* Not checking the accuracy of the maps being used despite
the age of the documents.
* Failing to inform the miners that they were cutting towards
a deserted mine shaft full of water.
During the inquiry management admitted that if it had undertaken
forward drilling or investigated the reports indicating a presence
of water, the disaster would have been avoided.
The media has hailed the move to prosecute the Newcastle Wallsend
Coal Company as a landmark decision. Certainly it
marks a change from the past practice when mining companies never
faced prosecutions of any kind over their responsibility for mine
deaths.
But the government's decision is largely cosmetic. It is designed
to placate the growing anger in the mining communities over the
number of mining fatalities and accidents while leaving the underlying
causes producing the unsafe conditions untouched.
While mine managers who breach safety standards deserve to
be prosecuted, the prevalence of unsafe conditions is not the
product of rogue employers or irresponsible
individuals. It is the outcome of the operation of the market
and the increasingly cutthroat competition in the industry internationally.
Over the last decade and a half, coal companies have slashed their
workforces, overturned protective work practices and imposed speed-ups
in order to cut costs and maximise profits.
Under these conditions, individual mine managers are driven
to cut corners to boost productivity and profits. As a result
the time and money is not spent to carry out necessary safety
procedures and the result is disasters such as the one at Gretley.
Management at Gretley were under added pressure as the parent
company Oakbridge had classified it as a marginal mine.
Government budget cuts have also undermined mine safety. Just
two months after the Gretley disaster government mine inspectors
went on strike because their numbers had been slashed by 30 percent,
further compromising their ability to carry out the necessary
mine inspections. It was only in recent months that $550,000 was
spent to review and digitise all the records of mine workings
held by the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR).
It is significant the government decided not to prosecute the
DMR even though the inquiry was highly critical of the Department
for issuing incorrect and outdated maps and for failing
to investigate the position of the old mine. Peter Hall
QC, lawyer for the families of the dead miners, stated that there
were legal grounds for a prosecution and that breaches by the
Department as well as the company were the direct causes
of the disaster. One can only conclude that the government
is reluctant to prosecute the department for fear of being implicated
by what might emerge in the case.
The mining union officials issued a statement criticising the
government for not prosecuting the DMR but made no comment on
any wider issues. Nor could they, as the union has worked hand
in glove with companies and governments over the last decade to
impose the cuts to jobs, working conditions and safety standards
in the name of making the industry internationally competitive.
The union has also played a crucial role of legitimising the
official inquiries convened to look into the ongoing carnage in
the mines. The outcome is always the same: recommendations are
made, minor legislative changes are passed, and even a few managerial
heads may roll, but the market prevails, production is put ahead
of safety, and workers continue to pay the price. Over the past
nine years, from August 1990 to November 1999, 45 miners were
killed in coal mines in NSW alone. Hundreds more have suffered
serious injuries.
See Also:
What price increased
productivity?
Four miners killed in Australian mine disaster
[2 December 1999]
Australia: Two accidents
highlight worsening coal mine safety
[22 July 1999]
Inquiry
covers up causes of Australian mine disaster
[16 July 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |