|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
: South
Africa
Government cover-up over South African factory fire
By Barbara Slaughter
1 December 2000
Use
this version to print
The South African Labour Department is trying to refute allegations
of government negligence; after it emerged it had been alerted
to the dangerous conditions at the Esschem factory in Lenasia.
The floor polish factory was destroyed by an inferno, which swept
through the building on the night of November 17, killing the
entire night shift ten female workers and one male supervisor.
Police have confirmed that all escape routes had been locked from
the outside. Forensic experts have since confirmed that a container
of chemicals, which by law should have been kept outside the building,
may have caused the fire. Factory owner Suleman Ebrahim Lachporia
has been charged with culpable homicide. He was released on bail
of 30,000 Rand ($4,000) and will appear in court on January 5.
One night-shift worker, Margaret Washington, escaped death
because she did not come to work that evening. She told the Beeld
newspaper that she had lodged a safety complaint with the Labour
Department earlier this year, after having sustained burns at
the factory. Fellow worker Katherine Jabu, who had been dismissed
from the factory, said that she had also lodged a similar complaint
in August.
Both women had raised the fact that they were locked inside
the factory for up to 16 hours; that gas bottles were illegally
stored inside the building; that there was a lack of fire extinguishers
and ventilation and that there was no emergency alarm system.
Phillip Collier, a former occupational health safety inspector,
who said he had access to computer records proving that the two
had sent in written complaints about their working conditions,
confirmed their statements. Collier said that a trainee inspector
had been sent to Lenasia to follow up the complaints, but had
returned without doing so because he could not locate the factory.
He added that it would be unfair to pin the blame on the trainee,
because a senior inspector should have been assigned to the case.
Collier also alleged that the tragedy was directly related
to what was happening in the department. He resigned in July and
is one of 97 inspectors who have lodged a grievance over the way
occupational health and safety inspectors have been lumped together
with other general inspectors. He said that since August last
year, 20 qualified inspectors had resigned, reducing staffing
levels to under 100.
Labour Department director-general Rams Ramashia reacted "with
alarm" over the allegations of lax occupational health standards
at his department. He says he has now launched a safety inspection
blitz on factories near Johannesburg.
So far, a team headed by Ramashia himself and supported by
Zwelinzima Vavi, Secretary-General of the Congress of South African
Trade Unions (Cosatu), has inspected two factories, but has refused
to make a statement about the conditions they found there. Its
owners shut a third factory, which manufactured biscuits, a few
hours before the inspection team was due to arrive.
"The owners just locked up and left before everybody arrived,"
a labour ministry official said.
This bizarre train of events gives some indication of the conditions
that exist in many South African factories. The Occupational Health
and Safety Act governs health and safety in the workplace. It
was introduced by the apartheid regime in 1993, one year before
the ANC government came to power. The system has many loopholes.
The Department of Labour must be notified of all accidents, but
the system is self-regulating, depending on employers to report
accidents and unsafe practices. Unscrupulous employers do not
report accidents and those who ignore safety regulations are,
in effect, guaranteed long-term immunity until a tragedy like
that in Lenasia occurs.
Ramashia is concerned that the international image of South
African industry has been damaged by the Esschem deaths. He is
seeking to put the onus onto to the backs of workers by "imploring"
them to come forward and report breaches of safety rules. But
their complaints about factory conditions are likely to be treated
with the same disregard as that of the two Esschem workers.
Workers' compensation is governed by the Compensation for Occupational
Injuries and Diseases Act, also passed in 1993, and is also controlled
by the Labour Department. The Compensation Commissioner's office
is responsible for collecting accident statistics so that injured
workers can receive compensation. But they are not required to
immediately notify the Health and Safety Inspectorate, which should
trigger an investigation into the circumstances of any accidents.
A work accident is not identified as such until a claim for compensation
is accepted and finalised, which gives rise to delays in reporting
of a year or more.
Workers are prohibited from suing their employers through the
courts, protecting employers against a legal challenge. Compensation
is paid from a fund to which all registered employers contribute.
Under the government scheme, workers and their families are
robbed of adequate compensation, which is paid according to the
earnings of the worker concerned. The families of the Esschem
workers, who have lost their loved ones and been left without
an important breadwinner, will receive very little compensation
because their wages were so low. Margaret Washington reported
that she was earning little over $10 a week.
Employers, on the other hand, are protected from having to
pay the legal fees and damages that would flow from a successful
negligence claim. The only consequence for negligent employers
is that they have to pay an increased contribution to the Compensation
Fund.
See Also:
South Africa: Eleven die in
factory fire
[23 November 2000]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |