|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Mumia Abu-Jamal supporter jailed for speech at Republican
National Convention protest
By David Walsh
8 December 2000
Use
this version to print
A prominent supporter of US political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal
has been sentenced to 90 days in prison for parole violation by
a federal magistrate in Philadelphia. Judge Arnold Rapoport sent
Clark Kissingera leading member of the left group Refuse
& Resist!to jail on Wednesday because the latter had
traveled to Philadelphia in August, in defiance of onerous probation
terms, to make a speech in defense of Abu-Jamal during protests
organized outside the Republican National Convention.
The crime for which Kissinger was placed on parole
was refusing to move when ordered to do so by Park Rangers at
a rally for Abu-Jamal held July 3, 1999 at the Liberty Bell in
Philadelphia. Ninety-four people were taken into custody at the
time. They were charged with failing to obey a lawful order,
a charge equivalent to a traffic ticket. Most of those arrested
paid a $250 fine.
Eight defendants, including Kissinger, pleaded not guilty and
chose to go to trial. A senior staff member of the US Attorney's
Office prosecuted the low-level case. The government was obviously
determined to make an example of the defendants, both for their
general defiance of authority and their continued campaign in
defense of political prisoner Abu-Jamal. Rapoport ordered the
eight defendants to pay the $250 fine and sentenced them to one-year
probation sentencesfor an offense considered less serious
than a misdemeanor.
The probation terms represented a blatant attack on democratic
rights. The defendants were prohibited from any contact with felons,
including Mumia; they were required to hold jobs, making it impossible
for them to work full-time in the defense campaign; they were
forbidden to leave the federal court district in which they resided
without permission from a probation officer; they were ordered
to turn over a list of all organizations to which they belonged,
as well as their financial records. Additionally, the eight were
obliged to turn in their passports and submit to visits by probation
officers. The probation terms essentially criminalized activities
carried out in defense of Abu-Jamal.
I turned in my passport, says Kissinger, and
I report to my parole officer, but when it comes to First Amendment
stuff, I have refused to cooperate. He has not complied
with the directive to keep out of the company of felons. In
my line of work, most of the people I see have been arrested for
something. Nor has he filed any financial information. In
regard to travel restrictions, Kissinger comments, Whenever
it's been a request for something personal, like visiting my sick
mother in Massachusetts, it's granted by my parole officer, but
whenever it's something political, he has referred it to the sentencing
judge, Federal Magistrate Arnold Rapoport, and he's always refused
me permission.
This is what took place in August, when Kissinger applied for
permission to make a speech at a rally for Abu-Jamal. When permission
was not granted, Kissinger went and gave the speech. The probation
officer subsequently notified Rapoport.
In sentencing the Refuse & Resist! leader December 6, Rapoport
indicated that once Kissinger has served his 90 days in jail,
the conditions of the parole will remain intact. According to
the Refuse & Resist! web site, the judge remarked, A
trail of disruption follows this man wherever he goes. Kissinger's
lawyers, Ron Kuby and Anthony Erba, announced they would appeal
the sentence and filed a motion to stay its execution.
Kissinger may be the first political activist on the left to
be sentenced to prison for delivering a speech since World War
II. In should be noted, however, that Kissinger's appearance and
sentencing have received virtually no coverage in the media.
The World Socialist Web Site has principled differences
with the Refuse & Resist! organization, but the jailing of
Kissinger is an outrageous attack on the right of free speech
and free assembly and democratic rights as a whole. The government
is giving itself the right to silence any voices it doesn't like.
The entire state apparatus in Philadelphia is resolved to execute
Abu-Jamal, who has been on death row for 18 years. He was framed
up for the December 7, 1981 shooting death of Philadelphia policeman
Daniel Faulkner. His case has become an international symbol of
the struggle against the death penalty, state violence and racism.
Philadelphia authorities have conducted a systematic campaign
to deprive opponents of the effort to push Abu-Jamal into the
death chamber of their constitutional rights.
A suspicious break-in at the office of Abu-Jamal supporters
in June resulted in the theft of boxes of files containing financial
records and lists of high-profile contacts. A well-known supporter
of Abu-Jamal, Ernst Ford, alleges that a police car followed him
home recently. Ford reports that the policeman approached him
and said, Mumia's going to die, and so are you. Ford
and the International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia, sponsor
of the protests, have filed a complaint.
Abu-Jamal's lawyers are currently appealing his conviction
in a federal District Court and a hearing will be scheduled in
the near future. Supporters have declared December 4-11 a Week
of Awareness for Abu-Jamal, marking the nineteenth anniversary
of the killing for which he was falsely convicted. Demonstrations
will be held in various cities, including Philadelphia.
The tenuous state of democratic rights in Philadelphia emerged
in another court case this week in which dozens of protesters
faced charges for being inside a puppet warehouse
during the Republican National Convention protests in August.
Seventy-five people were arrested in a police raid on the warehouse,
which was viewed as a preemptive strike against those planning
to demonstrate at the GOP gathering. Those arrested were not taken
in for any crime they had committed, but supposedly to prevent
future criminal behavior. The affidavit in support of a search
warrant had asserted that the protesters were financed by Communists.
On Monday, Judge James M. DeLeon refused to dismiss charges
against 46 defendants accused of a variety of misdemeanors. The
judge ruled there was sufficient probable cause for the raid,
and that there was no prior restraint of free speech and no improper
police conduct.
The judge today ruled that there was probable cause based
on the fact that people possibly could have done something,
commented Bradley Bridge of the Defender Association. That's
possible cause, that's not probable cause, and that's not a reason
to go to trial.
According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, defense attorney
David Rudovsky argued that police had a special obligation
to wait until protesters actually broke the law to arrest them
because their activitiesthe protestsinvolved First
Amendment issues.
The prosecution's case collapsed on Wednesday when undercover
state troopers were unable to identify a single defendant responsible
for committing a crime among mug shots of those arrested. The
cops recognized three individuals, but could not connect them
to any crime. All 31 defendants whose photos were examined December
6 will have their cases dismissed or dropped. The undercover police
will look next week at the photos of 30 more defendants charged
with misdemeanors.
Protests of Clark Kissinger's sentencing can be directed to:
Arnold C. Rapoport, 610-776-0369, Fax 610-776-0379;
or to the judge who will rule on the appeal of his 90-day sentence:
Honorable Bruce Kauffman,
US District Court,
601 Market Street, Philadelphia,
PA 19106,
Fax: 215-580-2281
See Also:
Federal magistrate imposes
severe restrictions on supporters of US political prisoner Mumia
Abu-Jamal
[14 June 2000]
Mumia
Abu-Jamal
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |