|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: The
Balkans
Cyanide spill "a catastrophe of European dimensions"
By Julie Hyland
15 February 2000
Use
this version to print
A poisonous chemical spill has destroyed wildlife and fish
stocks and threatened the water supplies of 2.5 million people
in central Eastern Europe. Romania's River Somes, Hungary's River
Tisza and Yugoslavia's Danube, Europe's largest waterway, have
all been catastrophically polluted. The Black Sea is also expected
to be affected by the spillage, which originated at the Baia Mare
gold mine in northern Romania.
On February 1, approximately 100,000 cubic metres (3.5 million
cubic feet) of cyanide, used to extract gold from waste, was released
into the river when a reservoir wall at the mine collapsed. The
lethal chemical first entered the Somes river before passing into
the Tisza river, a tributary of the Danube, where it reached a
density of 800 times the accepted maximum level. Serbia, Romania
and Bulgaria all draw drinking water from the Danube. The European
Union Commissioner for Transport and Energy, Loyola de Palacio,
said that the spill was "a catastrophe of European dimensions".
Hungary has described the spillage as Europe's worst ecological
disaster since that at the Chernobyl nuclear plant in the Ukraine
in 1986. The Tisza has been officially declared a dead river.
Hungarian towns along the Tisza have banned the use of water,
fishing and sales of fishthreatening the livelihoods of
many fishermenand emergency water supplies had to be brought
in for those living close by. The Hungarian daily Magyar Hirlap
reported crowds of stunned people gathering, with black flags,
to "mourn" the river.
Serbia's Environment Minister Blazic said, "The Tisza
has been killed. Not even bacteria have survived." Although
the chemical has gradually lost its lethal effect as it becomes
diluted with river water, over the weekend hundreds of dead and
dying fish were reported to be piling up at the junction of the
Danube and Tisza, just 50 kilometres upstream from the Yugoslav
capital of Belgrade.
The allowable maximum of cyanide per litre of water is 0.1
milligrams. Yugoslavia's official Tanjug news agency said the
cyanide level was 1.1 milligrams per litre at the Hungarian town
of Szeged bordering Yugoslavia on Friday night, but this had fallen
to 0.06 milligrams on Sunday. Approximately 300 tonnes of dead
fish have been removed from the rivers, and authorities are trying
to find the best means of disposing of them.
The River Tisza is expected to take at least five years to
recover. Speaking on Belgrade's independent B2-92 radio station,
Istvan Baskonyi, the mayor of Kanjiza, a northern Yugoslav town,
said that whilst reports had estimated that the cyanide would
disappear from the river system in one month, heavy metals will
remain in the seabed. Karoly Pinter of the Hungarian agriculture
ministry said it was this more than the cyanide that posed the
gravest danger. "The heavy-metal parts which are extremely
poisonous have been deposited in the mud. These disintegrate much
slower and poison the environment for much longer," he said.
Zoltan Illes, the Hungarian parliament's environmental spokesman,
warned: "The fact that heavy metals also got into the rivers
means an even worse problem. It will poison the whole food chain."
The poisoning has sparked a bitter dispute over compensation
claims. Hungary, Romania and Serbia are all demanding damages
from the gold mine's owners, a Romanian joint stock company, Aurul
S.A. The majority share is held by the Australian company, Esmeralda
Exploration Ltd, whilst the Romanian government control 45 percent
and Romanian business interests the remaining 5 percent. Aurul
shares were suspended on the Australian Stock Exchange after their
value slumped by almost 40 percent as news of the incident became
known.
Romania, which has gained a reputation as a major industrial
polluter in the past, has tried to down-play the damage in order
to improve its chances of gaining EU membership.
Romania's Carpathian mountains contain significant amounts
of gold and other precious metals. Esmeralda Exploration began
work on the Baia Mare Tailings treatment facility in 1997, after
an Australian engineering firm, Lycopodium, won the contract for
the US$28.2 million project.
The Aurul mine works stockpiles of tailings previously treated
for base metals, which are turned into slurry and sent to a conventional
gold treatment plant. According to reports, the gold mine had
experienced problems with water prior to the latest incident.
Esmeralda's latest annual report documents an earlier small leak
from pumping equipment and incidents in which the main treatment
plant received slurry flow rates at double the intended capacity.
It also reports hostility towards the project from environmental
and political groups.
Aurul SA has secured three exploration licences covering 78.52km(x2)
in the Oas-Gutai Mountains, immediately north of the mining town
of Baia Maire. Another venture in which Esmeralda holds a 97.5
percent interests, Explorer SA, has also secured three exploration
licences for 74.82 km(x2) land adjacent to the Aurul licences.
The company web site boasts that "the licences held by the
two companies have secured all known prospective ground from the
western mining fields around Baia Mare and as far north as the
Ukraine border".
Esmeralda has admitted that the lake containing the mine's
poison waste over-flowed in heavy rains, but accused east European
officials of exaggerating its effect. Esmeralda spokesman Chris
Codrington said that footage of dying fish shown on CNN and Hungarian
television shows them "still flapping. If it was cyanide
poisoning they would be dead. And, if there are dead fish in Hungary
why have there not been any reports of dead fish in Romania, which
is much closer to the tailings dam? The company is sending
its own scientists to investigate the incident and has said it
will vigorously oppose any compensation claims.
Esmeralda chairman Brett Montgomery said allegations that cyanide
had killed the fish caused him "considerable scepticism",
adding that the extreme weather that had caused the initial spill
could also be responsible for the deaths. Australian government
officials also defended the company. Western Australia's state
resources minister Colin Barnett said, "From my knowledge
... the mine was developed to a high standard." Environment
Minister Robert Hill said it would be wrong to "rush to judgement,"
whilst rejecting calls for tougher laws to be introduced on Australian
mining companies operating overseas.
Eastern European officials have accused Australia and other
western countries of "ecological colonialism". A Hungarian
government spokesman said that there was "no question"
of Aurul's responsibility for the disaster. "We can count
the dead fish and it's sure that the fish did not die of pneumonia,"
he said. Zoltan Illes, environmental spokesman for the Hungarian
parliament, said that the Australian government had a responsibility,
even "for privately-owned Australian companies". Calling
on Hungarian ecologists to begin an international campaign over
"eco-colonisation", he told a local radio station, "The
profit was produced here but the profit is used elsewhere. The
contamination is being left here, nature is being destroyed here
in Central Europe, the health of hundreds of thousands is being
endangered, while in the meantime these technologies are, perhaps,
not permitted in their own country, in Australia or, say, in western
Europe."
The cyanide spill has exacerbated the environmental crisis
within Yugoslavia, already facing serious pollution problems arising
from NATO's air bombardment. Between March and June last year
NATO targeted petrochemical plants, oil refineries, fuel storage
depots and major industrial plantsreleasing thousands of
tonnes of highly toxic chemicals into the air and water supplies.
See Also:
Report on impact
of war in Yugoslavia
Potential environmental catastrophe in Balkans
[14 July 1999]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |