|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America : The
Brutal Society
The Amadou Diallo case: The social and political roots of
police violence
By the Editorial Board
28 February 2000
Use
this version to print
The four New York City police officers acquitted February 25
in the shooting death of Amadou Diallo may still face departmental
trial and could be removed from the force if it is found that
the shooting violated police department guidelines. In addition,
Diallo's parents intend to file a civil suit against the police
and the city, and the Justice Department announced, through the
US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, that it would
review the case to determine whether there were any violations
of the federal criminal civil rights laws.
Whatever the results of future proceedings, the Albany verdict
has its own sinister significance. It has already been interpreted
as justification for the virtual police occupation and daily abuse
of poor and minority neighborhoods, including the killing of innocent
people. In the words of one of the police lawyers, the verdict
means police officers legitimately have to be aggressive
in the twinkle of an eye. We pay them to do that as a society.
We can't afford to put a hitch in their step. Maybe the jury knew
that.
The police serve as defenders of the existing social order
in a city characterized by staggering social inequality. While
all forms of social spending have been slashed repeatedly over
the past 25 years, police ranks have been beefed up to an unprecedented
40,000.
Their central task is to defend the haves against the have-nots
in a city whereaccording to one recent studythe top
20-percent income bracket makes 25 times more than the bottom,
and where the nation's largest homeless population walk the same
streets as the world's greatest concentration of multi-millionaires.
The firing squad-style killing of Diallo is only the most appalling
expression of the effective denial of basic democratic rights
to working class and poor people, especially, but not only, the
black, Hispanic and immigrant populations. Under the stop
and frisk policies implemented by the Street Crime Unit,
tens of thousands have been thrown up against the wall and searched,
based on suspicions every bit as flimsy as the one that led to
the West African immigrant's death.
According to the NYPD's own conservative estimates, 16 black
"suspects" were stopped for every arrest made. Cops
report that in some neighborhoods youth were subjected to this
brutalizing treatment so many times that they would "assume
the position" for a search themselves upon seeing a car full
of plainclothes police approaching.
The transfer of the trial from the Bronx to Albany added insult
to injury: not only do workers face unprovoked police shootings,
they are denied the right to serve as jurors after such atrocities.
New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani hailed the acquittal of the
cops, and heaped praise on a jury system that had barred the residents
he represents from sitting as jurors. It fills me with profound
respect for being an American and for living in a country that
has a trial by jury, said Giuliani. Last week, the mayor
repeatedly attacked anti-police prejudice, likening
it to racial bigotry or anti-Semitism, and compared New York City
cops to "civil rights workers."
Giuliani's opponent in the upcoming contest for US Senator,
Hillary Clinton, responded to the verdict in terms nearly identical
to those of Giuliani. We must all work together toward the
day when all citizens and all police treat each other with mutual
respect, she said, adding, We must not allow this
verdict to divide New Yorkers. While Bill Clinton lists
as one of his major accomplishments the hiring of 100,000 more
police through federal funds, his wife proposes to add another
50,000 to this number.
In an earlier letter to the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association,
the police union representing the four Street Crime cops, she
apologized for having referred to the Diallo shooting as "murder,"
saying she "clearly misspoke." She went on to declare
her support for the death penalty in cases where police officers
are killed.
The reaction of many New Yorkers to the verdict was one of
stunned disbelief and anger. Hundreds of people gathered spontaneously
on the Bronx street where the police shot down the African immigrant
a year ago to demonstrate their anger in the hours after the cops
were acquitted. Thousands marched down Fifth Avenue in Manhattan
on Saturday, ending up at City Hall. Scores were arrested on charges
of disorderly conduct and inciting to riot.
Thousands more rallied across the street from the United Nations
building on Manhattan's East Side on Sunday in a demonstration
called by Al Sharpton's National Action Network. Sharpton, who
in recent years has undergone a transformation from racial demagogue
to leading black operative in the New York Democratic Party, paraded
various politicians before the crowd. Among them was David Dinkins,
whose four-year term as mayor saw as many fatal police shootings
as have taken place during seven years under Giuliani, and Harlem
Congressman Charles Rangel.
The central demands put forward by the Democratic politicians
were for a federal civil rights case against the four cops and
the establishment of an independent civilian oversight board for
the NYPD.
Anyone with illusions that such palliatives will have any more
impact than calls by some police "experts" for greater
"sensitivity training" for New York City cops need only
turn his eyes to Los Angeles. Federal civil rights prosecution,
it should be recalled, was the route followed after the four cops
who savagely beat black motorist Rodney King in California in
1991 were acquitted in a state trial, which had been moved out
of the city to the predominantly white suburb of Simi Valley.
That acquittal touched off massive rioting that left more than
50 people dead.
The federal trial, aimed at assuaging the raw emotions provoked
by the acquittal, resulted in the conviction of just two of the
LA cops, who were both given minimum sentences of 30 months in
jail.
As for oversight, Los Angeles has had a civilian Police Commission
for years and three years ago created an inspector general's office,
charged with probing issues of police corruption and abuse.
The impact of these initiatives has been nil. This has been
made clear as details of a festering scandal in the LAPD continue
to leak out. More than 70 cops are reportedly under investigation
and the FBI has been called in amid evidence of rampant corruption
and brutality, including testimony that an anti-gang unit regularly
framed up, beat and even killed innocent people.
Such police scandals are a perennial fact of American life.
From the Knapp Commission in the 1970s to the Mollen Commission
in the 1990s, revelations of New York City cops acting as criminals
while inflicting deadly violence on the populations they supposedly
protect emerge with startling regularity.
The enormous social polarization existing in New York City
and throughout the United States is incompatible with basic democratic
rights. The ruling establishment has no choice but to employ state
repression to defend its system and its privileges. That is the
message sent out by the verdict in Albany.
Appeals for police reform or Federal court intervention will
not change this underlying source of police brutality. That requires
the building of a new, independent political movement fighting
to unite all working peopleblack, white, Hispanic and immigrantin
a common struggle for a socialist alternative to capitalist oppression
and social misery.
See Also:
Acquittal of New York City police: court
sanctions murder of Amadou Diallo
How the trial was rigged
[28 February 2000]
Amadou Diallo murder trial drawing to
a close
[22 February 2000]
Trial begins in New York police killing
of Amadou Diallo
[9 February 2000]
Inequality and
police brutality in New York City
The social underpinnings of the murder of Amadou Diallo
[12 March 1999]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |