|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
Japan makes overtures to the military junta in Burma
By Sarath Kumara
24 January 2000
Use
this version to print
Japan appears to have broken ranks with the United States and
the European Union over the policy of isolating Burma (Myanmar)
and has begun to develop economic and political relations with
the country's longstanding military junta.
Japanese Prime Minister Obuchi Keizo met with junta chairman
General Than Shwe at the November 29-30 ASEAN summit in Manila.
It was the first top-level contact between a major power and Burma
since the military crackdown on opposition protests in 1988. The
last time a Japanese prime minister met his Burmese counterpart
was 15 years ago.
Obuchi told General Than Shwe: "If your country tackles
economic reforms seriously, we are ready to support your country's
economic reform with our experience". Tokyo has partially
lifted the freeze on its yen-denominated loans and has promised
to give Burma an official development assistance (ODA) package,
amounting to $US23.8 million, to help rebuild Yangon (Rangoon)
airport. Japan offered to pay higher prices for buckwheat from
Burma as part of an opium crop-substitution program.
Two days after the ASEAN summit, former Japanese prime minister
Ryutaro Hashimoto flew to Burma at the head of a 48-member private
business delegation organised by the Nippon Foundation, which
included representatives of Keidanren or the Federation of Economic
Organisations, Japan's largest big-business group, together with
former diplomats, civil servants and economists.
Although the visit was termed unofficial, Hashimoto acts as
a senior foreign-policy adviser to Obuchi and clearly went with
the Japanese government's blessing. He met with Than Shwe and
was feted to a banquet by the Burmese leadership. According to
a report in AsiaWeek, Hashimoto urged the junta to accelerate
moves to open up the economy to international investment and privatise
state-owned enterprises.
According to an article in the Financial Times on December
15: "The Keidanren, and a Japan-Myanmar Association of big
corporations, is strongly supported by pro-business members of
the ruling Liberal Democratic Party who are moving closer to Burma's
powerful military intelligence establishment."
Thailand's Nation newspaper reported that Hashimoto
criticised the stance of the US and Europe for isolating the military
junta. He said the policy had only served to "drive the Burmese
leadership into a corner and makes it more and more obstinate".
Prior to the trip, a Japanese Foreign Ministry spokesman said
Japan had a "slightly different" approach than the West.
"We share the same concerns about human rights and democracy,
but don't shun dialogue, he said.
For the last 18 months the European Union and the US have insisted
that any relaxation of Burma's international isolation be connected
to political reforms aimed at ending the military dictatorship
and the restrictions on the opposition National League for Democracy
led by Aung San Suu Kyi.
In April 1997, the Clinton administration joined the EU in
imposing sanctions against Burma and banned all new American investments
to the country. Last October 11, the EU extended its sanctions,
which include a ban on entry visas for Burmese leaders and the
suspension of high-level visits, for another six months. As a
result, a meeting scheduled in Berlin between EU and ASEAN foreign
ministers had to be canceled.
According to an AsiaWeek report, a group of nations
met in Britain in late 1998 and offered Burma $1 billion in aid
if it carried out democratic reforms. Burmese Foreign Minister
Win Aung told AsiaWeek: "This is like offering a banana
to a monkey and asking it to dance. We are not monkeys. We won't
dance". Last October the World Bank issued a damning report
on the Burmese economy and reiterated that there would have to
be political reforms before any aid package.
Japan's latest moves on Burma indicate its growing preparedness
to assert its interests and challenge the US and the EU. According
to Toshiro Kudo, a researcher at Japan's semi-government think-tank,
the Institute of Developing Economics: "Burma has grown in
Japan's strategic consciousness since it joined the Association
of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in 1997."
Japan has now effectively adopted the position of ASEAN, which
argues that a "constructive engagement" including investments,
will pave the way for political change in Burma. The shift has
been prompted in part by complaints from Japanese business that
opportunities are being lost to exploit Burma's natural resources
and cheap labour. The country has petroleum, precious stones,
timber and minerals such as lead, zinc, tin and tungsten as well
as some of the lowest wage levels in Asia.
Singapore is Burma's leading investor with over $1 billion
invested over the past five years. It is also the largest trading
partner, accounting for 25 percent of Burma's total annual foreign
trade. At present Japan is among Burma's 10 leading foreign investors
but is lagging behind both India and Thailand.
China, which has been the Burmese junta's major backer, is
also increasing trade and other ties. A group of entrepreneurs
from Hong Kong was in Burma during December to seek new investment
opportunities in timber and real estate. It was led by businessman
Tsui Sze-Man, a member of the Standing Committee of the Chinese
People's Political and Cultural Conference.
For its part the Burmese military junta has indicated its willingness
to embrace pro-market reforms. The country's powerful chief of
the Directorate of Defense Services Intelligence, General Khin
Nyunt, told an AsiaWeek journalist recently: Look,
we transformed the economic system of Myanmar from a centrally-planned
socialist system to a market-oriented one... And don't forget
we also led Myanmar out of isolation and into becoming a meaningful
member of ASEAN."
The Burmese military dictatorship never had anything to do
with socialism. The Burmese road to socialism was
simply the ideological cover for the junta's policies of national
economic regulation and its control over a network of state-owned
enterprises. The development of globally integrated production
in the 1980s and 1990s completely undermined the junta's attempt
to maintain an isolated and increasingly stagnant Burmese economy.
Until now, the US, Europe and Japan have backed Aung San Suu
Kyi and her National League for Democracy as the best instrument
for opening up the Burmese economy to foreign investment and at
the same time controlling the widespread pent-up hostility to
the military dictatorship. But the shift in the orientation of
the military junta towards encouraging investment has produced
a reassessment by the major powers, most notably Japan, and alarm
in the Burmese opposition.
Referring to Japan, Suu Kyi stated in her New Year address:
"As the richest Asian country and as a democracy Japan has
a duty to try to promote human rights and democracy in other parts
of Asia". In an interview last year, she had denounced the
admittance of Burma to ASEAN, declaring that it had made the regime
much more repressive. She demanded that sanctions
on Burma continue and praised the role of the US and the EU.
But there is now speculation that the EU and the US, fearing
they will lose out to Japan, may also shift their positions. As
the AsiaWeek article of January 14 concluded: Even
among diehard anti-regime Western nations, there is a growing
receptivity to new approaches. Recently, the envoys of several
European and North American nations privately conceded that sanctions
and ostracism are not working.
See Also:
Thai-Burma border
reopens after weeks of tension
[26 November 1999]
Protests against the
Burmese military junta
[3 November 1999]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |