|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Ireland
New evidence supports allegations of RUC collusion in murder
of Irish lawyer
By Mike Ingram
26 January 2000
Use
this version to print
A 17-member inquiry team headed by incoming Metropolitan Police
Commissioner Sir John Stevens has obtained new evidence supporting
allegations of collusion between the Royal Ulster Constabulary
(RUC) and Loyalist paramilitaries.
Police believe they have identified a six-man terrorist gang
that carried out the shooting of Catholic civil rights lawyer
Pat Finucane in 1989. The evidence has been sent to the Director
of Public Prosecutions naming three loyalists as the hit men with
three more acting as a backup team.
Stevens had headed a similar inquiry at the time of the killing,
which uncovered links between loyalist paramilitaries and the
British army. The findings of that inquiry were kept secret and
only came to light some years later. Stevens was called in to
start a fresh investigation last April as demands for a public
inquiry mounted.
While Stevens's efforts focus on the possibility of rogue
officers from the RUC and Army intelligence colluding with loyalist
death squads, for 10 years human rights campaigners have insisted
that the collusion goes to the very heart of the RUC itself. The
Finucane family has refused to co-operate with the Stevens team,
insisting that only an independent pubic inquiry, which excludes
the RUC from conducting any of the investigations, will bring
out the truth about this and other killings.
Police officers have obtained DNA samples from at least one
murder weapon and a Balaclava helmet worn by one of the killers.
A number of tape recordings in RUC possession have also been located.
Witness accounts and forensic material is said to support claims
that the RUC failed to prevent the killing, despite being warned
in advance by at least two informers.
Of the six men identified by the investigation, two are accused
of firing 13 shots into Pat Finucane at his family home in West
Belfast. A third man is said to have driven the getaway vehicle.
The evidence suggests that a backup team of three more men were
waiting in a car near the Finucane home, giving some indications
of the importance assigned to the operation.
Finucane was most probably targeted because he had acted as
defence counsel to a number of Republican suspects. Last year
another lawyer, Rosemary Nelson, was killed in a car bomb following
the public stance she had taken to demand an inquiry into RUC
collusion in the Finucane murder. Prior to her death, Nelson had
said that she had received death threats via her clients after
they were interrogated by the RUC.
One of the first actions of the new investigation was the arrest
of William Stobie, a self-confessed member of the Ulster Defence
Association (UDA), who was charged in the Finucane murder. At
a remand hearing, Stobie insisted that he was a registered informer
for the RUC Special Branch at the time of the Finucane murder,
and that he had phoned his police handlers twice to tell them
an unnamed "top Provie" was going to be shot.
The inquiry team is said to have found evidence supporting
Stobie's claim, including statements from previous informers and
former RUC officers. Fingerprint and DNA evidence from tapes and
papers kept by the RUC and Army, and obtained by forensic experts,
links Stobie with certain security handlers as well as loyalist
terrorists.
Stobie's claims were given added credibility when respected
Irish journalist Ed Moloney published an interview he had conducted
with Stobie at the time of the Finucane murder. Stobie explained
how, as a UDA quartermaster, he was responsible for providing
the weapons to be used in the killing. His warnings to the RUC
were ignored and no action was taken to prevent the assassination.
Moloney revealed how all of this was known to the RUC for at least
10 years.
The issue of RUC collusion in the Finucane murder refused to
go away and became intimately bound up with the Northern Ireland
"peace" process, under which policing was to be the
subject of a major review.
Commenting on the new evidence, the Independent newspaper
in Britain said that the "findings come at a highly sensitive
time for policing in Northern Ireland after the Government announced
implementation of the Patten report into the future of policing.
The handling of the Finucane case over the 10 years is cited by
critics as an illustration of why far-reaching change is necessary."
However, demands for the disbanding of the RUC have been largely
ignored by the British government in favour of cosmetic changes
such as renaming it the Police Service of Northern Ireland and
removing the crown from the RUC badge. The new evidence highlights
just how mild the proposed RUC reforms are given the force's history
in enforcing the sectarian divide.
See Also:
British government to implement reform
of Royal Ulster Constabulary
[22 January 2000]
Northern Ireland: Loyalist
paramilitaries had security intelligence files
[9 November 1999]
Ireland
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |