|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : World
Economy
Asian "recovery" on shaky foundations
By Joe Lopez
3 July 2000
Use
this version to print
Most economic policy bodies and think tanks have concluded
that the Asian economies have recovered from the crisis of 1997-98
and can look forward to stronger growth in the coming period.
The Pacific Economic Cooperation Council, for example, has predicted
that growth in the region will expand from the 3.9 percent recorded
in 1999 to 4.9 percent this year.
However optimism over the region's economic future has been
called into question by a number of recent comments by economic
analysts who maintain that the recovery rests on shaky foundations,
dependent to a great extent on continuing US economic growth and
exports to the US market.
In a recent report, cited in a Wall Street Journal article,
entitled If America Sneezes .., Bill Belchere, the
Asian economic analyst for Merill Lynch warned that Asia's
healing process appears to be losing momentum. The Asian
recovery was dangerously dependent on growth in the US economy
and the volatile technology sector in particular.
According to the WSJ: A drop [in US demand] could
expose deep structural problems, including the heavy debt lingering
in the region more than two years after the financial crisis.
Or in Belchere's words: If the tide rolls out, we may
find that much of the wreckage is still there.
UBS Warburg economist Arup Raha, quoted in the same report,
said that the words recovery and robust
could be replaced by double dip. The recovery
in South East Asia has been singular in nature in that it relies
on exports. Right now, this is the danger, Raha said.
Pointing to the dependence on the US market, the WSJ
commented: The big fear is weaker exports. South East Asia's
recovery has been powered largely by US consumers, who are buying
everything from Indonesian-made sneakers and Thai silk to Philippine-assembled
Intel chips. The US is the largest buyer of South East Asian goods,
more than 20 percent of exports from Thailand and Malaysia and
nearly 30 percent from the Philippines. The ripple effect is even
greater. Much of the trade within South East Asia is in parts
and materials used to make goods that are later sold to the US.
Adding these goods in process' to the consumer
spending that flows from US trade, analysts estimate the impact
on regional economies could be multiplied by several times.
The stability of Asian stock markets is also of concern. An
article published in the Australian last month, entitled
Asia Still on the Brink, pointed to significant falls
in Asian bourses over the past two months.
For those who heeded the chorus of go international'
advice from the investment advisersand went into funds with
Asian exposurestheir hair will already be standing up on
end.
Just look at the Nikkei: from 20,883 in mid April to
16,008 six weeks later. Or the Hang Seng: 18,301 in late March,
13,722 in late May, before its latest bounce. South Korea's main
index down from 915 to 655 ... was another. The picture in Singapore,
Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines is no better.
The article cited comments by Ord Minnet chief economist Frank
Shostak who maintains that recent claims of an Asian recovery
are superficial. According to Shostak, the bounce
in the Asian region is nothing more than a response to rapid increases
in money supply which, when reversed, will leave all the underlying
problems in the region just as they were two years earlier.
Governments have injected large amounts of money into their
economies over the past two years but this process cannot go on
indefinitely. According to Shostak: They're scared of pumping
too much money because they'll create price inflation. The Asian
recovery is a phony one, there is no substance behind it.
The underlying instability of the East Asian economies and
their dependence on the continued rise of Wall Street was also
the subject of a report published in the Far Eastern Economic
Review in late April. Written in the aftermath of the plunge
of the NASDAQ index on April 14, the article warned that financial
contagion in once again infecting Asia's markets.
On April 17 an estimated $US200 billion was wiped off
the value of Asian stocks as index after index around the region
followed the NASDAQ benchmark into free fall. While the April
17 sell off may have been a simple knee jerk reaction, the fear
that prompted Asian investors to unload their stock holdings in
response to the slide in US equities has a rational base. The
relationship works like this: Plunging stock prices erode the
wealth recently accumulated by US households. Facing a decline
in the value of their assets, consumers tend to spend less, reducing
the demand for the manufactured goods that have long been a mainstay
of Asian exports to the United States. US corporate demand for
Asian goods is also likely to suffer. Rising capital costs implied
by falling stock prices could force companies to curtail investments
in information technology.
The FEER article cited comments by Fred Wu, head of
economic research at the Development Bank of Singapore, who pointed
out that of $328 billion worth of electronic goods exported by
Asian countries last year, $117.5 billion or 36 percent went to
the US. Wu estimated that reduced US demand for Asian exports
could knock as much as two percentage points off the economic
growth rates of countries around Asia.
With continuing economic stagnation in Japanthe world's
second largest economyand US economic growth dependent on
continuing inflows of foreign investment to fuel the unstable
Wall Street bubble, the Asian economic recovery could
be rather short-lived.
See Also:
Bank report points to financial
storms
[10 June 2000]
Economic stagnation set to
continue in Japan
[3 June 2000]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |