|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Airline
Disasters
Safety concerns raised in aftermath of Concorde crash
By Stefan Steinberg
28 July 2000
Use
this version to print
Details are emerging concerning the crash of Air France Concorde
Flight AF 4590 on Tuesday afternoon. As the plane left the ground
at Charles de Gaulle airport near Paris for its scheduled flight
to New York, the pilot reported to the control tower that one
of the plane's four jet engines was defective. Eyewitnesses reported
that flames were already visible from one wing as the plane was
completing its takeoff.
The Concorde requires a faster takeoff speed than other commercial
jets, and despite the malfunction of one engine it was too late
for the pilot to prevent the plane taking off. With flames streaming
from one wing, the plane wheeled around as the pilot sought to
make an immediate emergency landing at an adjoining airfield.
The fire in one of the two jet engines on the left side of the
plane spread immediately, however, to the second engine, rendering
the plane unmanoeuvrable.
Laden with over 80 tons of fuel for its transatlantic flight,
the plane plunged to the ground and struck a hotel. All passengers
and crew as well as four guests at the hotel were killed. Those
near the scene likened the impact and explosion to that of an
atomic bomb.
Rescue forces were barely able to identify plane parts, let
alone the identity of passengers, most of whom were burnt beyond
recognition. The only reliable method for identifying the victims
is DNA comparisons, and police are currently collecting appropriate
samples from relatives of the deceased.
Most of the passengers who died were German tourists who were
to begin a cruise holiday when the plane landed in New York. Entire
families perished, as did a number of pensioners who had saved
over years for their holiday of a lifetime. One elderly woman
victim was due to celebrate her seventieth birthday July 27. Shock
and disbelief were the immediate reactions of many of the relatives,
who took part in memorial services held in both France and Germany
Although investigations are just under way and the jet's black
boxes have still to be examined, the accident at the Paris suburb
of Gonesse has raised a number of issues relating to air safety.
Problems with the plane had been identified a day before the tragedy.
At the end of its scheduled flight from New York to Paris the
plane's pilot noted problems with the thrust reversal unit attached
to one of the engines. Prior to takeoff Tuesday afternoon he insisted
that the unit be changed. Takeoff was delayed for over an hour
while a maintenance crew installed a unit from another Concorde.
As of now there is no direct evidence of a connection between
the replaced thruster unit and the failure of one of the engines.
But the hasty, last minute repairs recall a similar incident that
took place two weeks ago. On that occasion an airbus of the Hapag-Lloyd
fleet was forced to make an emergency landing in Vienna after
taking off with a defective engine.
Concorde has been regarded as one of the safest passenger planes,
with nearly twenty-five years of commercial service without casualties.
Nevertheless, reports emerging in the aftermath of the crash have
drawn attention to weaknesses in the construction of the plane
that may have played a role in Tuesday's crash.
Concorde's unique takeoff pattern and rapid acceleration to
supersonic speeds require enormous amounts of highly combustible
fuel. Fully loaded, the plane carries 120 tons of fuelfour
times more, per passenger, than that carried by normal commercial
jets.
The Concorde has other unique features. Normal design regulations
for commercial planes require an adequate distance separating
two engines mounted on the same wing. This is to prevent a fire
or electrical fault in one engine from spreading immediately to
the second. On the Concorde, the two engines on each side are
actually built into the wing and directly adjoin one another.
A second unique feature, enabling the plane to fly beyond the
speed of sound, is the attachment to each engine of an after-burnernormally
a feature of supersonic fighter planes. The after-burner injects
an extra dose of fuel into the turbine, enabling acceleration
to supersonic speed at the flick of a switch.
Any damage to one of the plane's engines that interfered with
the flow of fuel would have dramatic consequences for a Concorde
in flight. The particular plane which came down on Tuesday was
the oldest of the 13 Concordes which are still active.
In an article in the French newspaper Parisien, Bernard
Thouanel, an author of books on aviation, reported that an identical
catastrophe in virtually the same spot was previously prevented
only at the last minute. In April of 1988 a defect was noticed
in one of the engines of Concorde Flight AF 001 immediately after
takeoff. In order to prevent an explosion, the pilot shut down
the engine and then, so as to enable the plane to make an emergency
landing, jettisoned 55 tons of fuel. In that case the plane was
able to land safely and without casualties.
However, in 1973 six crew members and ten bystanders died when
the prototype Russian supersonic plane Tupolev TU 114 crashed
on a demonstration flight at the Le Bourget air show.
Tuesday's crash also raises concerns for the hundreds of thousands
of people who live in the immediate vicinity of the airfield.
The region to the west of Charles de Gaulle Airport is inhabited
by over 400,000 people. The vast majority of planes fly over this
area following takeoff.
Following partial privatisation (62 percent of Air France is
owned by the French state, the rest is in private hands) and in
the face of a series of strikes by airport personal, Air France
Chairman Jean-Cyril Spinetta recently introduced an extensive
cost reduction programme. As a result, Europe's third biggest
airline was able to record its best ever revenues and profits
for the year 1999/2000.
Despite Tuesday's tragedy, both Air France and British Airways
are under considerable pressure to return to business as
usual. British Airways announced on Wednesday that it would
be continuing its regular Concorde flights.
See Also:
Concorde--its history and tragedy
[28 July 2000]
Airline
Disasters
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |