|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
Fragile peace in Ethiopia-Eritrea war
By David Rowan and Chris Talbot
6 July 2000
Use
this version to print
Representatives from Ethiopia and Eritrea are taking part in
further peace talks in Washington this week. A partial peace agreement
was signed in Algiers on June 18 and both sides appear to have
observed a cease-fire since that date.
The peace plan worked out by the Organisation of African Unity
(OAU) and the United Nations calls for the deployment of a UN
force under the aegis of the OAU. This is to occupy a 25 kilometre
(15 mile) wide buffer zone along the Eritrean side of the border
until UN cartographers can demarcate the disputed frontier between
the countries.
The war fought between the two countries since May 1998 is
ostensibly over where the territory of Eritrea, a former province
of Ethiopia, begins. It stands as the biggest war on African soil
since the beginning of the twentieth century, involving over half
a million troops fighting in protracted trench warfare. Whilst
both countries are among the poorest in the world, the regimes
in Addis Ababa (Ethiopia) and Asmara (Eritrea) have spent millions
on high-tech military hardware. At least 100,000 people have died
in the fighting and over 750,000 Eritreans were displaced in the
last period.
Under the OAU/UN agreement, Addis Ababa has largely won the
demands it made after its military successes in May, when it penetrated
far into Eritrea. Ethiopian troops will have to withdraw from
Eritrean territory two weeks after the deployment of the UN force,
but will remain in occupation until then. Disputed land under
Ethiopian control before May 1998 will continue to be policed
by Ethiopian troops. Ethiopian Foreign Minister Seyoum Mesfin
called the agreement a "political victory for Ethiopia".
The signing of the accord was followed by secret talks to discuss
the size and implementation of the UN mission that is to police
the 1,000 kilometre (600 mile) border between the two countries.
In attendance were US envoy Anthony Lake, a three-member UN team
sent by Secretary General Koffi Annan and representatives from
the European Union and the OAU.
Throughout the talks Eritrean and Ethiopian representatives
refused to meet face to face and tensions between the two countries
remain high, with both governments whipping up nationalist sentiments
and accusing the other of war crimes. Some analysts predict a
resumption of fighting before a UN force can be implemented.
The Washington Post referred to the "deep frustration"
felt by the Clinton administration, which had viewed "the
two countries as part of a regional strategic bulwark against
the influence of neighboring Sudan". It pointed out that
Anthony Lake had shuttled back and forth between the two countries
for more than a year.
Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki accused the West of "mute
indifference" to the conflict and of supporting Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa is equally suspicious of Western governments, only
accepting the UN force if it was under the aegis of the OAU. An
Ethiopian government spokesman stated they would not accept the
participation of "certain countries" in the UN operation
that are considered biased towards Eritrea economically and militarily.
Economic rivalry between the two countries has been exacerbated
by Western trade with Eritrea, which lies on the coast, at the
expense of landlocked Ethiopia.
Notwithstanding the responsibility the regimes in Ethiopia
and Eritrea share for the war and the suffering it has brought
to the people of the region, the disaster in the Horn of Africa
is primarily the responsibility of the Western powers. They were
happy to mute criticisms of these regimesnow described by
Western commentators as "senseless"when they were
regarded as a bulwark against Sudan. Both regimes emerged out
of national movements, which had received Western military backing
when they fought as allies against the pro-Soviet Ethiopian regime
of Mengistu Haile-Mariam in the 1980s. Just before the war began,
President Clinton praised both Meles Zenawi in Ethiopia and Isaias
Afwerki in Eritrea as part of an "African renaissance".
Throughout the 1990s both regimes abandoned the socialist rhetoric
they had used as guerrilla fighters and sought Western investment
on the basis of implementing free market economics. Despite the
poverty of the region and the huge problem of periodic droughts,
the support they received has been minimal. Addis Ababa and Asmara
responded by building up their armies and blaming each other,
diverting attention from the growing economic crisis and debt.
As soon as the war began many Western countries, including Britain
and Germany, used it as an excuse to cut their aid budgets further.
Drought is once again seriously afflicting the region. The
UN Children's Fund (UNICEF) has issued a warning that it threatens
the lives of up to 13 million people in the area. UNICEF's chief
Carol Bellamy said it posed a "humanitarian crisis on an
enormous scale", which could prove as serious as the famine
of the 1980s. Eritrea was particularly affected because the war
had stopped food crops being planted. Bellamy appealed for urgent
financial support.
Only days before the UNICEF appeal, the UN released a report
from a high-level task force on the Horn of Africa. The report
states that with overseas aid currently so lowofficial figures
put it at just $15 per person per yeara new approach was
needed to end the vicious cycle of famine and drought. Western
governments would like nothing more than to abandon any responsibility
for the people of the region, who the report says should "move
towards greater self-reliance" and take "responsibility"
for themselves.
See Also:
Peace efforts fail to halt
Ethiopia-Eritrea war
[13 June 2000]
Historical
and social issues behind the Eritrean-Ethiopian border war
[11 June 1998]
Ethiopia-Eritrea
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |