|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America : The
Brutal Society
After the execution of Gary Graham: the world looks at America
and America looks at itself
By David Walsh
24 June 2000
Use
this version to print
The June 22 execution of Gary Graham, sanctioned by Texas Governor
and Republican presidential candidate-to-be George W. Bush, has
cast a penetrating light on American society and helped lay bare
its contradictions. Although hardly the first state murder carried
out in the US, there was something particularly shocking and horrifying
about the event. This quality was clearly felt around the world.
Graham was put to death Thursday night, but the entire society
was on trial. His final statements amounted to an enduring curse
against the existing social order. One has the sense that this
desperate voice from the death chamber gurney will haunt those
who organized and carried out the execution for years to come.
By any standards of civilized society Graham's death was a
barbaric act. Everything about the caseGraham's social background
and his age (seventeen) at the time of his arrest, the lack of
physical evidence linking him to the crime, his identification
by only one witness, his criminally incompetent legal counsel
and travesty of a trial, his nearly two decades on death rowreeks
of injustice and state-organized brutality.
Great numbers of people in the United States and around the
world have reacted to the execution with horror. There is a widespread
feeling that something terrible has happened. This perception
is healthy and humane, but it can only lead to a change in the
situation if difficult political questions are confronted: Why
does American society carry out crimes like this? How is this
barbarism to be explained, and combated?
There are currently some two million people in prison and more
than 3,500 people on death row in the US. The state of Texas has
executed 23 people in 2000 alone; Bush has presided over the execution
of 134 individuals in his five years in office. No other countries
in the economically advanced regions of the globe have comparable
figures; for the most part, they don't have figures on executions
at allcapital punishment is banned in Western Europe.
A society that resorts to incarcerating and executing its citizens
in such numbers thereby admits that it is incapable of solving
its social problems. Why, in the final analysis, do the vast majority
find themselves on death row? Because they are poor and semi-literate,
or victims of one kind of abuse or another, or mentally ill, or
all of these. Because, in short, society has given them little
or no chance in life. The American ruling elite and its two political
parties have no answers for the poverty and misery in which millions
are forced to live.
The existence of these conditions provides the key to understanding
what seems on the surface a great paradoxthat the grim cavalcade
of punishment and death has coincided with what is officially
described as the most prolonged economic expansion in US history.
Analysis reveals that the stock market and profit boom have benefited
a relatively small portion of the population, primarily the top
10 percent.
The creation of a flexible, low-wage economy, in
which workers are constantly prey to insecurity, has not improved
the conditions of the vast majority. On the contrary, absolute
poverty has tightened its grip on the most oppressed and tens
of millions more struggle to make ends meet.
The executives of major corporations in the US make more than
400 times the pay of an average worker. Such a level of social
inequality can never be voluntarily or democratically accepted
by the population, even in the absence of conscious political
opposition. It must be policed. One of the inevitable consequences
of the social chasm between the rich and everyone else is the
meting out of severe punishment to those unlucky enough to be
on the wrong side of the law.
Official violence is hardly a new or incidental feature of
American life. This is the land, after all, of the police truncheon,
the third degree, the strikebreaker, the vigilante,
the political witch-hunt and the judicial frame-up. One only has
to mention a few names to evoke this legacy of cruelty and repression:
the Molly Maguires, Joe Hill, Sacco and Vanzetti, the Rosenbergs.
A variety of historical and ideological factors can be cited to
explain the particular brutality of the American ruling eliteits
origins in the extermination of the native population, its shortsighted
and pragmatic frontier mentality, the absence of social-democratic
buffers, and so forth.
In the end, however, the present violence of the system
can only be explained by the present state of American
society. The US is the most powerful capitalist economy on earth.
Yet behind the veneer of prosperity and beneath increasingly threadbare
democratic forms, it harbors the fiercest and most bitter class
conflict. This exists objectively. That the working population
is largely unconscious of this conflict, or at least of its implications,
does nothing to lessen it.
The denouement of the Gary Graham case, as it unfolded Thursday
night, sharply exposed this social conflict. More than that, Graham's
last hours became a significant episode within the struggle of
opposed classes. Graham did not go quietly to his death. He resisted,
refusing even to eat his last meal on a table provided
by his killers. He went to his death proclaiming his innocence
and denouncing his murderers.
Who is Gary Graham? In 1981 he was a thief and a thug, responsible
for a series of armed robberies and a rape. His poverty-stricken
background prepared him for that, as similar backgrounds have
prepared thousands of others. But his years in prison changed
him, radicalized him.
Graham left this world with a certain nobility. People like
him are victims of the social meat grinder. There is no society
on earth that wastes human potential more than America. Graham
committed violent crimes, but how can that be weighed against
the 19 years of torment, waiting to be slaughtered, inflicted
in a premeditated fashion by official society? What can be said
in defense of a system that mobilizes a Cell Extraction
Team to drag a man from his cell, straps him to a table
and injects carefully-prepared poisons into his bloodstream? The
Graham killing exposed the gruesomeness of what goes on every
week in the US, in one state or another. The entire society, with
its pretenses to democracy, pays a heavy price for this sort of
crime.
The response by the political and media establishment has been
nervous and defensive, from the ashen-faced reporters who witnessed
the execution to a frightened-looking Bush. They don't know what
to make of the event and the widespread revulsion.
These are people who believe their own press clippings. Mesmerized
by their stock portfolios, they truly believe that opposition
to their policies, including radical opposition, is a thing of
the past.
They were taken aback by Thursday's events, which did not go
at all as planned. An event intended to further brutalize the
population largely turned into its opposite: the starting-point
for sensitizing masses of people and waking them from their political
and even moral torpor.
The Graham execution and its reverberations will have a radicalizing
effect on the American people. Already the presence of hundreds
of demonstrators outside the Huntsville facilityas well
as rallies in Austin, Texas; San Francisco and Northampton, Massachusettspoints
to a growth of social protest. This will increase.
This state murder will help clarify the real state of affairs
in America. Young people in particular will be increasingly horrified
by a society that glorifies billionaires and puts the poor and
oppressed to death by half a dozen equally cruel methods. The
campaign to defend Mumia Abu-Jamal, another intended victim of
state murder, will gain new strength from the popular response
to the Graham case.
The assembly line of executions will deepen the hostility felt
for both political parties, united in their support for the death
penalty. Vice President Al Gore and California's Democratic right-wing
governor Gray Davis, for example, took the opportunity of Graham's
death to restate their belief in capital punishment.
Periods of social radicalization have often announced themselves
in the US by the growth of opposition to frame-ups and capital
punishment. This is historically bound up with the growth of labor
militancy in the early part of the twentieth century. In the late
1950s the case of Caryl Chessman, finally executed in 1960 after
12 years on death row, became a focal point of social protest
and heralded the radicalism of the following decade. Conversely,
the growth in support for the death penalty in the mid- and late
1970s indicated a right-wing turn by sections of the middle class
and working class.
For much of the world's population Graham's death will only
heighten the belief that the US represents a threat to democratic
rights and perhaps to human life in general. The general reaction
in the European press has been shock and dismay. The US is seen
as a bully, or worse. The credibility of American democracy, with
its claims to represent a model for every country on earth, is
increasingly a mockery. More and more, the US is seen as a pariah
state.
There are signs of growing unease in the political establishment
about the consequences of the death penalty policy. There are
those who worry that the official bloodlust will alienate the
population and undermine faith in the system as a whole. The narrowness
of the Supreme Court vote to reject Graham's appeal, a 5-4 margin,
has to be seen in this light.
In the end, the decisive issue is what large numbers of workers,
students and intellectuals make of Graham's execution. There will
be those who consider it terrible, but an aberration. Others will
shake their heads, hoping such a thing will never happen againalthough
they know better. Some will try to ignore it and go about their
business. But this execution is not an accident. It is deeply
rooted in the social relations and political structures of American
capitalism.
The death penalty will not be overcome by appeals to established
institutions or to the Democratic or Republican parties, nor can
it be overcome if it is addressed as an issue apart from all others.
It must be fought on a new basis, as part of the development in
the working class of an independent political movement based on
a truly democratic, and therefore socialist, program.
See Also:
In cold blood: the state murder of Gary
Graham
[23 June 2000]
The Brutal
Society: Death penalty and police brutality
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |