|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Further moves to undermine Australian public broadcaster
By Janine Harrison
24 November 2000
Use
this version to print
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), the country's
major public broadcaster, has been hit with funding cuts to its
news and current affairs division that further threaten its independence.
The cuts mark an escalation of attempts by successive governments
to silence the ABC as a source of news and analysis.
The ABC's new managing director Jonathon Shier announced the
cuts last month in his 2000-2001 budget. The ABC Board, hand-picked
by the Howard government, appointed Shier eight months ago in
order to restructure and commercialise the national broadcaster.
A man with no experience in public broadcasting, he has worked
exclusively in commercial television in Britain and Scotland for
the past 23 years, mainly selling advertising and pushing pay-TV.
Shier has made it clear that he views the ABC as a business
and is intent on developing its profitable areas. He told a recent
staff briefing that he wanted to reinvent public broadcasting
in Australia and referred to himself as a mini-media mogul
with no money.
The news and current affairs division requested $120 million
to maintain its present level, but received only $112 million
in Shier's budget. Shier attempted to play down the extent of
the reduction, claiming that it was just $3.7 millionan
estimate based on an adjusted budget figure from last year. In
real terms, however, the cut is $8 million.
Although this may appear to be a relatively small amount, it
comes on top of more than a decade of crippling cuts. Senior staff
in news and current affairs have indicated that the division is
struggling financially and that the latest reductions will have
a serious impact on the quality of programs.
ABC Radio will lose $2 million. Shortly before the new budget
was announced, a memo from the head of ABC local radio suggested
that Radio National's flagship morning and afternoon current affairs
programs, AM and PM, should focus more on lifestyle
areas and business reporting, rather than politics and economics.
PM should be reduced from 50 minutes to 20 minutes, the memo stated.
Shier has yet to announce his programming changes and staff
cuts but it is already clear that 100 jobs will be eliminated
in TV production alone, including camera operators, editors and
sound and lighting technicians. A 12-month wage freeze has been
imposed, together with restrictions on travel.
A memo circulated to staff declared that money shaved
from traditional parts of the ABC will be used to support initiatives
approved by the board. The funding taken from news and current
affairs will be transferred to the ABC's online service and digital
TV. Shier has also spent more than $6 million since July on redundancy
payments for 26 axed executives.
The ABC Charter, which requires the ABC to provide an
independent national broadcasting service, does not cover
the Internet and pay-TV. Commercialisation has already been attempted
through an unsuccessful joint venture in pay television in 1995,
and a commercially-sponsored satellite television service to Asia
that was sold to the Channel Seven Network in 1997. Both these
ventures were bitterly opposed by ABC staff members.
Founded in 1932 as the Australian Broadcasting Commission,
the ABC has come under increasing government pressure over the
past two decades. The Hawke Labor government began the process
of commercialising the ABC in 1983 when it replaced the Commission
with the Corporation, designed to run along business lines. The
ABC's reliance on commercial income has grown since thenlast
financial year it earned $140 million from non-government sources,
or 16 percent of its total revenue.
Under the Hawke and Keating Labor governments $120 million
was cut from the ABC's annual budget and a major downsizing took
place. Program production was wound back significantly, particularly
in the smaller states, and between 1987 and 1992, 1,200 jobs were
slashed. An extremely hostile relationship developed between staff
and ABC executives, who refused to keep staff informed about restructuring.
ABC transmissions were regularly disrupted by industrial action.
When the Howard government came to office in 1996 one of its
first acts was to slash a further 10 percent, or $50 million,
from the ABC's budget, despite election promises that its funding
would not be touched. A further one in five jobs were eliminated
and severe cost-cutting measures adopted.
Facing staff opposition and public alarm, the management agreed
to protect the news and current affairs division as much as possible
by absorbing the cuts in other areas, but this has become increasingly
difficult. Now that the latest cuts specifically target news and
current affairs, entire programs such as Foreign Correspondent,
The 7.30 Report and Lateline could face the axe.
Members of the Howard government have made no secret of their
enmity towards the ABC for its supposed political bias. They are
particularly anxious to suppress scrutiny of the government with
a federal election due in 2001. Former staff members claim that
they experienced political interference while working at the ABC,
and that they were censured on a number of occasions for satirical
material about Prime Minister John Howard.
In a step toward further commercialisation, Shier has commissioned
a private consultant's report recommending Disney-style merchandising
of ABC brands and the establishment of an ABC-brand credit card.
Evidence has also emerged that the merchant bank Credit Suisse
First Boston has prepared a report on privatising the ABC, but
the report was deemed too politically sensitive to be released.
A leaked cabinet-in-confidence document from Communications
Minister Richard Alston in 1996 outlined the government's position
clearly: I have previously indicated my support for an approach
where resources are targeted to fit a redefined role for the ABC
and also wish for the ability to influence future ABC functions
and activities more directly.
Formally, the ABC Act stipulates that the ABC shall not be
subject to government direction, except that the Minister can
direct the broadcasting of a particular matter that he considers
to be in the national interest. This legislative protection, however,
means little when the government can starve the ABC of funds.
In addition, the ABC Board has been stacked with members who
have close ties to the ruling Liberal and National Parties and
support the government's agenda. Most prominent among these is
the chairman Donald McDonald, who has longtime links with the
Liberal Party and is a close personal friend of Prime Minister
Howard.
Others include right-wing economics professor Judith Sloan,
a well-known free-marketeer who also serves on the economic rationalist
Productivity Commission and several corporate boards; Michael
Kroger, a merchant banker who previously headed the Liberal Party
in the state of Victoria; and former Liberal MP Ross McLean, who
is the deputy chief executive of an employers' body, the Chamber
of Commerce and Industry of Western Australia.
There has been considerable opposition to the government's
plans, both within the ABC and among ordinary people. Stopwork
meetings took place around the country the day after Shier unveiled
his budget, and staff have foreshadowed a campaign in defence
of the ABC, bringing together organisations, community groups
and individuals opposed to its destruction. Reflecting these concerns,
Eric Beecher, a publisher and former editor of the Sydney Morning
Herald, recently used one of the ABC's televised annual lectures
to launch a scathing attack on Shier and the erosion of serious
journalism by commercial forces.
Public anger is particularly strong in rural areas where the
ABC is the only source of news and information for many people,
providing local content and specialised coverage of issues affecting
those on the land. This coverage caters to a relatively small
and widely scattered audience and therefore is not commercially
viable.
The rural-based National Party was forced to condemn the cuts
in order to appease voters who have already lost many basic services.
Its Senate leader, Ron Boswell, said: We want an informed
electorate, we don't want a dumbed down electorate. The
hypocritical character of this stance was exposed when National
Party leader and Deputy Prime Minister John Anderson wrote a letter
to Shier opposing the cuts but later endorsed them by declaring
that we in the bush know that you often have to do more
with less.
Apart from the ABC and the smaller immigrant-oriented radio
and TV outlet, Special Broadcasting Services (SBS), Australia's
mass media is dominated by a handful of tycoons, notably Rupert
Murdoch, Kerry Packer and Kerry Stokes. Packer owns the top-ranking
television networkNineas well as a large stable of
news, women's and other magazines. Murdoch owns a daily national
newspaper, the Australian, plus dailies in nearly every
capital cityin some cases the only daily newspaper. Their
companies also control the pay-TV group Foxtel and Internet company
One.Tel. Stokes owns the second-ranking TV network, Seven.
The gutting of the ABC will strengthen this extraordinary media
oligopoly and serve to further stifle informed discussion and
debate.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |