|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America : US
Economy
DaimlerChrysler to cut thousands of jobs in North America
By Larry Roberts and Jerry White
28 November 2000
Use
this version to print
Auto analysts say DaimlerChrysler must eliminate between 20,000
and 40,000 jobs at its North American Chrysler division and permanently
close at least one of its 13 plants in the US and Canada because
of huge financial losses. Over the last several weeks the very
future of the Chrysler unit has been called into question after
third-quarter losses of more than half a billion dollars, projections
of even higher losses in the fourth quarter and into 2001 and
a precipitous fall in the company's share value.
DaimlerChrysler Chairman Juergen Schrempp told employees last
week that Chrysler had only 14 percent of the US market, but it
was staffed as if it had a 20 percent share. According to analysts
at Deutsche Bank (a major owner of DaimlerChrysler), that means
the company must eliminate 38,000 salaried and hourly workers,
or a third of Chrysler's 129,000 employees.
The discussion of mass layoffs followed an emergency meeting
in Stuttgart, Germany where management fired several leading executives
at the Chrysler division, including unit president James Holden,
who was replaced by longtime Mercedes Benz executive Dieter Zetsche.
Within days the company announced that four plants would be idled
during Thanksgiving week and the next because of large inventories
of unsold cars. The temporary layoffs affect some 17,000 workers.
Schrempp, who laid off more than 40,000 employees after taking
over Daimler Benz in 1995, picked Zetsche because of his reputation
for slashing jobs to cut costs. In September, Zetsche directed
the layoff of 20 percent of the US workforce at DaimlerChrysler's
truck division, Freightliner, eliminating 3,800 jobs after orders
fell. In a recent letter to Chrysler employees Zetsche said the
division faced far-reaching structural problems that
required painful, but necessary actions.
Senior DaimlerChrysler executives have begun discussions with
representatives from the United Auto Workers union to reopen the
four-year contract covering 76,000 workers in the US in order
to clear the way for the layoffs and carry through other cost-reducing
measures. Management wants more flexible contract
terms, particularly involving those provisions that guarantee
laid-off workers 95 percent of their pay and prohibit the closure
or sale of plants during the duration of the contract, which expires
in 2003.
UAW officials have issued no public response, but UAW President
Stephen Yokich, who sits on the company's supervisory board, reportedly
gave his approval before management fired Holden and announced
the temporary layoffs. DaimlerChrysler management first conferred
with officials from the UAW and the German trade unions, which
also have seats on the company's board of directors. Erich Klemm,
deputy chairman of the supervisory council, said both unions were
pleased with the cost-cutting proposals.
The factories temporarily idled include: the Jefferson North
plant in Detroit, which produces the Jeep Grand Cherokee; the
Toledo, Ohio plant, which produces the Jeep Cherokee and Jeep
Wrangler; the Bramalea plant in Brampton, Ontario, a Canadian
plant that produces the Chrysler Concorde, Dodge/Chrysler Intrepid,
Chrysler 300M and Chrysler LHS models; and the Belvidere, Illinois,
plant, which produces the Dodge Neon subcompact car.
Auto analysts expect more plant closures will be announced
because of high inventories of cars, mini-vans, light trucks and
Jeep SUV's (sport utility vehicles). Auto dealers have cut back
their orders of new vehicles, creating a projected imbalance of
94,000 more vehicles produced than ordered.
Chrysler's huge losses in the third quarter were attributed
to its efforts to cut rising inventory levels by offering cash
rebates, in some cases as high as $4,000 per vehicle, as an incentive
to customers. Due to the competition from other automakers, particularly
in the glutted market for the highly profitable SUVs, the company
was unable to raise prices to cover their losses.
The crisis facing Chrysler is widely recognized as the product
of the slowdown of the US economy. Over the past several months
the auto industry has been impacted by the Federal Reserve Board's
efforts to slow the economy by raising interest rates, the higher
costs of car loans, as well as higher gasoline prices. In addition
to Chrysler, General Motors announced temporarily layoffs at four
plants in Janesville, Wisconsin; Shreveport, Lousiana; Wentzville,
Missouri and St. Therese, Quebec, affecting 10,000 workers. Ford
Motor Co. announced temporary layoffs affecting 3,600 workers
in Kansas City, Missouri and Avon Lake, Ohio.
Since January 1999 DaimlerChrysler's stock value has plunged
57 percent from its high point of $108 per share. During the last
year the value of the stock dropped 45 percent, closing at an
all-time low of $40.10 on November 21, a loss of $68 billion of
market value since January 1999. The collapse of the company's
share value led to speculation that the Chrysler division might
be sold off, and disclaimers from other auto companiesincluding
from Nissanthat they had any intention of buying it.
When the German automaker merged with Chrysler in May 1998,
the American company was considered highly competitive because
of its abilitywith the willing assistance of the UAWto
slash jobs, boost productivity and maintain high returns for investors
since its near brush with bankruptcy in 1980-81. Chrysler shrank
from 160,000 workers in the early 1980s to 79,000 at the time
of the merger.
One major factor contributing to the company's decline, no
doubt, is the high degree of parasitism practiced by the American
auto executives and big investors. Top Chrysler officials made
tens of millions of dollars in buyouts and other bonuses before
leaving the company, with little regard given to the long-term
health of the business or its employees. Because of golden
parachute clauses, which provided especially generous stock
options in the event of a takeover or merger, former Chrysler
CEO Robert Eaton netted $62.9 million personally, while Vice Chairman
Robert A. Lutz made $24.2 million.
More fundamentally, the recent events at DamilerChrysler are
part of a global restructuring of the auto industry, which is
being driven by a crisis of overcapacity. It is estimated that
there presently exist 80 assembly plants in excess of the number
needed to satisfy world market demand. In other words, even if
the entire US auto industry were to be removed from the equation,
there would still be a glut on international markets.
Since the merger of the German and American auto companies
there have been a series of mergers and consolidations aimed at
eliminating excess capacity and gaining competitive advantage
over global corporate rivals. This has led to a worldwide assault
on auto workers' jobs, as well as business failures, including
the bankruptcy announcement earlier this month by Daewoo Motors
of South Korea.
US workers can expect no lead from the UAW, which has demonstrated
its unwillingness and inability to defend jobs. In the early 1980s,
when Chrysler faced bankruptcy, the UAW collaborated in the wave
of concessions for auto workers. In exchange for a position on
the company's board of directors, the UAW accepted the shutdown
of dozens of plants, the layoff of tens of thousands of workers
and sweeping cuts in wages and benefits. The union bureaucracy
has dedicated itself to labor-management partnership
and the defense of the profit system. At the same time the UAW
has promoted chauvinism against workers in Japan, Germany, Mexico
and elsewhere for stealing American jobs.
If the UAW bureaucrats have refrained to this point from anti-German
rhetoric its only because they have been assured by DaimlerChrysler
management that their income and privileges will be preserved
in return for cooperation in imposing a new round of mass layoffs,
plant closings and concessions on auto workers.
A serious fight to defend the jobs of workers in the US is
only possible on the basis of a common struggle by American and
German auto workers against the multinational corporations. This
struggle must take as its starting point the need to protect the
jobs and livelihoods of all workers, not the profits of wealthy
investors and corporate executives.
See Also:
UAW contract with DaimlerChrysler
paves way for further downsizing in US auto industry
[18 September 1999]
Global changes
in auto industry underlie struggle over jobs
[16 June 1998]
The merger
between Chrysler and Daimler-Benz: what it means for workers
[8 May 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |