|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America : US
Elections
Elements of a conspiracy
How Bush's man at Fox News worked to shape the outcome of
the US election
By Kate Randall
17 November 2000
Use
this version to print
In the early morning hours of November 8, Fox News Channel
declared that the pivotal state of Florida had gone for George
W. Bush. At 2:16 a.m. Fox announced that the Texas governor had
won the state, thus securing the 271 electoral votes needed to
win the presidential election. The other television networks followed
suit in a matter of minutes. The call was subsequently withdrawn,
and to date the Florida outcome remains undecided.
The individual responsible for recommending that Fox call Florida
for Bush was John Ellis, who led the network's decision desk.
Ellis was not a disinterested party in the presidential election,
but the first cousin of the Republican candidate and his brother,
Florida Governor Jeb Bush.
Details emerging since Election Day concerning Ellis's role
in the network's decision to call Florida for Bush raise serious
questions as to whether his actions and Fox News's complicity
constituted not only a violation of the democratic rights of the
electorate, but a criminal conspiracy.
Ellis makes no bones about his Republican leanings and his
partisan support for Bush. And according to his own account of
his election night activities, contained in an article in the
current issue of the New Yorker magazine, he was in constant
communication with his cousins George W. and Jeb Bush.
Shortly after 6 p.m. two waves of exit polls from the Voter
News Service (a consortium set up by the major TV networks and
Associated Press) showed the Florida vote going for Democratic
candidate Al Gore. John Ellis received a call from the Bush campaign
in Austin and told them the bad news. At 7:52 p.m. the major networks,
including Fox, called Florida for Gore.
Just after 8 p.m. Jeb Bush phoned Ellis and asked him, Are
you sure?, to which Ellis responded, We're looking
at a screen full of Gore. It was at this point that the
Bush campaignaided by information to which they were privy
via their family connection at Foxwent into overdrive to
reverse what appeared to be a Democratic victory.
The Bush team called a press conference at the governor's mansion
in Austin and told the media that, in their opinion, the vote
was too close to call in Pennsylvania and Florida. The convening
of such a meeting with the press was highly unusual and broke
with previous election night precedent, according to which candidates
refrain from talking to the press until one of them concedes and
the other makes a victory speech.
The actions of the Bush campaign constituted a bald-faced attempt
to co-opt a servile media into stampeding public opinion in its
favor. The TV networks broadcast the interview even as large numbers
of voters were still heading to the polls.
The Bush protest appeared to achieve the desired effect. According
to Ellis's account, Voter News Service reports showed a reversal
in Florida between 8:00 and 9:00 p.m. in Bush's favor. Attributing
their previous projection for the Democrats to bad data
in one Florida county, between 9:00 and 9:30 all of the networks
retracted their call for Gore and called the race too close
to call.
What happened several hours later was even more suspicious.
Newsweek reports that in the hours after midnight Bush's
margin in Florida began to dwindle. A lead of 200,000 shrank to
100,000 and then to only 60,000. But remarkably, despite this
diminishing lead, at 2:16 a.m. Fox News made the callon
the direction of John Ellisfor Bush. Karl Rowe, Bush's chief
strategist, reportedly commented, It's just Fox, an
apparent reference to Fox's unabashed slant toward the Republicans.
But within a matter of minutes all of the networks had jumped
on the bandwagon, declaring Bush the winner.
In his interview with the New Yorker magazine, Ellis
recounted his 2 a.m. conversation with George W and Jeb Bush:
It was just the three of us guys handing the phone back
and forthme with the numbers, one of them a governor, the
other the president-elect. Now that was cool. In
other words, the Republican candidate, and the governor of the
state where the outcome of the race would be determined, had a
direct linethrough their cousinto a media outlet that
would broadcast their victory nationwide.
The extraordinary sequence of events that followed is by now
well known. In response to the call by the networks Al Gore telephoned
Bush to concede the election. But as Gore was on his way to deliver
his concession speech, the vice president's advisors urged him
to turn back, telling him Bush's lead had dropped to only several
thousand votes. Gore phoned Bush rescinding his concession.
Despite the media manipulation, the jubilation in the Bush
camp would be short-lived. By 3 a.m. the networks would again
reverse their call, putting Florida back in the undecided category.
But the Bush campaign continues to refer to this sordid episode
of media manipulationspearheaded by their man at Fox Newsas
one of their many victories in the presidential race.
According to Mark Fabiani, Gore's communications director, To
have a network like Fox call it and everybody follow suit was
a tremendously damaging thing. It took literally 24 to 48 hours
to convince people that Gore had won the popular vote.
After Ellis's role was revealed in the press, right-wing media
mogul Rupert Murdoch, chairman of News Corp, which owns Fox News,
came to his defense. He said that on election night every
journalist at every channel was trying to get in touch with every
candidate, trying to swap information. That's their job.
John Moody, vice president of editorial news at the Fox channel,
commented, I don't believe you should punish people for
who they are related to, as long as they don't misuse either the
relationship or their ability to get information.
The media as a whole has been reluctant to make much of John
Ellis's election night activities. Numerous calls by the World
Socialist Web Site to the television networks elicited no
comment. Consistent with their role in obscuring the machinations
of the Republican rightfirst in the effort to drive Clinton
from office, and now in the effort to obtain Florida's electoral
votes and the presidency by means of fraudthey choose to
look the other way.
However an examination of the communication between the Bush
cousins on election nightparticularly when viewed in light
of the subsequent drive by the Republicans to ride roughshod over
voters' rights and stampede their way to the White Houseexposes
something much more sinister than a mere swapping of information.
A glaring anomaly has never been explained. Why did Fox call
Florida for Bush at a point when the Texas governor's lead was
plummeting so rapidly that before Gore could even reach the location
of his concession speech, it had all but evaporated? One plausible
scenario is the following: Ellis might have called the election
for Bush at 2:16 a.m. not because the poll data from the Voter
News Service showed him winning but, on the contrary, because
it raised the specter of Bush losing the election.
Did Ellis, fearing that the networks might move Florida back
into the Gore column, decide to make a preemptive strike in the
hope of stampeding the other networks and conning Gore into making
a premature concession? Did the Bush campaign have a hand in Ellis's
call?
The strange and unexplained coincidence of a disappearing margin
for Bush and Fox's unilateral call, combined with the secret communications
between Ellis and the Bush camp, provide sufficient grounds for
an investigation into the possibility of an illegal conspiracy
to steal the election.
See Also:
George
W. Bush's three principles: lies, fraud and theft
[16 November 2000]
On-the-spot
report from Florida
Palm Beach becomes battleground in US election crisis
16 November 2000
US
Elections
[WSWS Full Coverage[
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |