|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
: South
Africa
South Africa's ANC government faces growing opposition
By Barbara Slaughter
14 November 2000
Use
this version to print
At a three-day meeting held in Pretoria last weekend, the South
African government's economic strategy received endorsement from
the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. IMF Deputy
Managing Director Eduardo Aninat said that South Africa had made
important fiscal progress. We are comfortable with the degree
of progress on the economic side, he said, adding that South
Africa had a solid banking system and could become a more sophisticated
regional centre.
South African President Thabo Mbeki told reporters, What
was said is that the direction is correct but we need to move
a little more vigorously with regard to a variety of matters.
Aninat made clear that two of the most pressing matters
in question were to reduce workers wages and carry out widespread
cuts in public expenditure.
World Bank President James Wolfensohn, also present at the
meeting in Pretoria, reassured international investors that there
is no possibility of South Africa adopting similar land policies
to President Robert Mugabe's Zanu-PF government in Zimbabwe. Investors
have been concerned about Mbeki's failure to condemn the occupation
of white-owned farms in Zimbabwe. This has been one of the factors
responsible for South Africa's currency volatility this year,
with the Rand losing almost a quarter of its value against the
dollar.
The representatives of international capital recognise the
potential for investment in South Africa, with its relatively
advanced economy and skilled working class. Their ringing endorsement
of the Mbeki government is in stark contrast to the treatment
meted out to many other African regimes, like Ethiopia, Eritrea
and Mozambique, where despite their desperate need, IMF finance
has been summarily cut off. It must indicate that Mbeki's government
has provided them with guarantees that they will implement IMF
policies to the letter.
This means aggressively implementing the austerity program
announced by President Mbeki in his State of the Union Address,
at the opening of parliament earlier this year. This outlined
further privatisation's, restructuring of the civil service, cuts
in public spending and the amendment of labor laws to remove protection
for workers.
Economists and business people within the country are also
demanding the government pushes ahead with the program. They accuse
the government of bumbling along and regard the period
since the election of the first African National Congress (ANC)
government in 1994 as wasted years, during which billions of dollars
of investment might have been attracted into the country.
Iraj Abedian, chief economist at Standard Bank, has called
on the government to take a much more active role in attracting
foreign investment. He cites the local auto industry, claiming
that a number of overseas motor investors could be persuaded to
invest in the production of auto-components and engines for overseas
markets. South African car workers have already been subjected
to attacks on their wages and working conditions. This has been
carried out in collaboration with the National Union of Metalworkers
of South Africa (NUMSA). In February this year, 1,450 Volkswagen
strikers were sacked and their rank and file leadership expelled
from the union. Mbeki denounced the strike as illegal and
unjustified.
The ANC government hosted business conferences with international
investors in Paris and Copenhagen earlier this year and is proposing
joint ventures with international conglomerates like British Aerospace,
which is to invest in the government-owned armaments firm Denel.
There are plans for the French conglomerate, Suez Lyonnaise des
Eaux, to take over Johannesburg's water and sanitation services,
resulting in significant job losses.
Growing poverty and inequality
It is anticipated that the privatisation program will raise
R150bn, but only 10 percent of this will accrue over the next
two years. The government is moving with caution because of concern
this may ignite social opposition to its policies.
The Apartheid regime was brought down six years ago by a massive
rebellion of the South African working class. Workers had great
hopes of building a better future and were misled by the socialist
rhetoric of the ANC into believing that Nelson Mandela's government
would implement policies beneficial to them. Since 1994, an elite
of black businessmen has enriched themselves under the program
of black empowerment. But according to an official
government report, the distribution of income and wealth in South
Africa is still among the most unequal in the world. The poorest
50 percent of the population receive only 11 percent of total
income, while the top 7 percent receive over 40 percent of the
total. Millions of workers live in desperate poverty. Some are
even worse off than they were under the old regime. There is a
chronic housing shortage and millions of families are denied basic
facilities promised by the ANC, like electricity, fresh running
water and adequate sewage provision.
Over half a million jobs have been destroyed since 1994 and
the rate of unemployment is almost 40 percent. A further 27,000
employees of the state railway's freight division are threatened
with the sack as the part of the government's drive for profitability.
When workers lose their jobs, they have to return to the rural
areas and their families face a life of destitution.
In addition, more than one person in eight is HIV positive,
with no access to treatment. Despite international protests, President
Mbeki has still not acknowledged the link between HIV and Aids.
The ANC government was reelected last year with a two-thirds
majority, but it is becoming increasingly unpopular. Mbeki's personal
approval rating has dropped from over 70 percent last December
to less than 50 percent today. There is a gulf developing between
the ruling elite and the working class and a growing alienation
from the parliamentary system. Less than half of all black South
Africans think that parliament is interested in what they think.
This figure was 73 percent only two years ago.
The ANC Alliance begins to fracture
This opposition amongst the broad mass of the population is
resulting in nervousness and divisions in the ruling Alliance
between the ANC, the South African Communist Party (SACP) and
the Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu). There is
even talk among sections of Cosatu and the SACP of developing
a broad movement to challenge the ANC, including the
churches, local chambers of commerce, Non-governmental Organisations
(NGOs) and others, on similar lines to the Movement for Democratic
Change in Zimbabwe. Also at least 42 ANC members from East London
and Port Elizabeth have registered as independent candidates in
the local elections on December 5though the ANC leadership
says this is because the individuals concerned did so because
they were omitted from the official party list.
There are no differences of principle between the Alliance
partners. They all claim to be carrying forward the National Democratic
Revolution (NDR), which the Stalinists of the SACP describe as
an intermediate stage between colonialism and socialism. The term
is a remnant of the ANC's Freedom Charter from anti-Apartheid
dayswhen such radical phraseology disguised the pro-capitalist
program of the ANC.
Today all wings of the Alliance support the market economy.
However, there is growing dissatisfaction in the lower ranks of
the SACP and Cosatu bureaucracy, which see the top leaders enriching
themselves in the New South Africa and feel themselves
excluded.
The SACP is a dominant political tendency in all three organisations,
with leading positions in the government. Public Enterprise Minister
Jeff Radebe is an SACP Central Committee member, Minister of Public
Service and Administration Geraldine Fraser-Molekati is SACP Deputy
Chair, head of the Government Communications and Information Service
Joel Metshltenahe was trained at the Lenin Party School in Moscow,
and Director General of the National Intelligence Service Vusi
Mavimbala was trained by the East German Stasi in the 1980s.
The situation is similar in the trade union movement. General
Secretary of Cosatu Zwelinzima Vavi is a member of the SACP, as
is the General Secretary of the Mineworkers Union, Gwede Mantushe.
Mbeki depends on the SACP and Cosatu to control the working
class, but is anxious to rid himself of what he regards as the
restrictions of the Alliance. This year he did not convene an
Alliance meeting until September 11 and is acting more and more
independently.
At the recent congress, Cosatu President Willie Madisha declared
that. despite the tactical differences that have existed
between the ANC and Cosatu, anything less than an overwhelming
victory for the ANC in the forthcoming elections will be a tragedy
for our country. But he complained, We as an Alliance
are in danger of losing our grip on the reins of state power.
The Alliance still needs to develop a decisive program to drive
the government and all organs of state before we can truly say
that we have constructed a state of national democracy.
He threatened the government with a campaign against the plans
to repeal the labor laws and said, We believe our program
will bring the government and business to their senses.
Cosatu and its affiliated unions long ago abandoned the defense
of wages and working conditions. Cosatu General Secretary Zwelinzima
Vavi supports the restructuring of some state companies, only
pleading that job losses should not be the primary goal
of the exercise.
The trade union bureaucracy is reaping profits from businesses
purchased with the R62 million collected from union members, many
of whom are earning poverty wages, as part of a campaign to
defend jobs. At the congress Madisha declared, We
are going to control, direct and manage these companies and make
them accountable.
In order to maintain some credibility with their members, the
unions have organised a protest campaign +against the government's
economic policy. This began with a program of limited strikes,
with the unions promising there would be no disruption to services.
On May 10 over a million workers supported a call for a one-day
national strike. At first the ANC opposed the action, but then
supported it. A follow-up strike is planned for next March and
then on a quarterly basis, if nothing is done about jobs.
In this way Cosatu hopes to control the class struggle and wear
down the working class. Moloantoa Molaba, spokesman for the National
Education, Health and Allied Workers Union, said the unions accepted
the need to avoid more serious strikes because the economy
is not doing well and there is a need to tighten belts, improve
productivity and profit margins for economic growth and international
competitiveness.
In response to the threat of militant action by workers, the
SACP has organized their Red October campaign, which
they describe as the first campaign to be solely led by
the SACP since the 1940s. It calls for the transformation
of the financial sector, for the right of workers to open
bank accounts and for the founding of co-operatives.
When the SACP's low-key criticism of the government was reported
in the press recently, however, they immediately issued a denial,
stating, Business Day and now the Mail and Guardian
reported that the SACP attacked and blamed the Presidency of the
ANC for problems in the Alliance. We wish to place on record that
we never blamed the ANC President for not convening the Alliance
meeting.
On privatisation the SACP Central Committee issued a fawning
statement welcoming the development of a comprehensive policy
framework on restructuring state assets and acknowledging
the exemplary way in which the Minister conducted a comprehensive
consultative process in finalising the policy framework.
See also:
Continuing
racism in South Africa: White employer drags black worker to death
[8 September 2000]
South
Africa: The ANC government and the AIDS crisis
[5 July 2000]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |