|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America : US
Elections
Voting rights denied to 3.9 million Americans due to criminal
convictions
By Kate Randall
8 November 2000
Use
this version to print
As the US elections were under way November 7, an estimated
3.9 million Americans, or one in fifty adults, were denied the
right to vote due to felony and other criminal convictions. In
many cases these individuals have been permanently stripped of
their voting rights. Of these 3.9 million people, 1.4 million
have already completed their sentences and another 1.4 million
are on probation or parole.
This disenfranchisement of voting rights disproportionately
affects African American men. Thirteen percent, or 1.4 million,
of black adult males are denied the right to vote based on criminal
convictions. This amounts to more than one-third of the total
disenfranchised voters. In 10 states more than one in five adult
black men are denied the right to vote on this basis; in seven
states, one-quarter of black men are disenfranchised. Southern
and western states comprise the bulk of states with the most restrictive
and punitive disenfranchisement laws.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) reports that no other Western country
denies as many peopleeither in absolute or proportional
termsthe right to vote because of felony convictions. The
US also has the largest documented prison population2 millionof
any country, and this burgeoning rate of incarceration provides
the basis for states to deny voting rights to growing numbers
of citizens.
A recent HRW report predicts that, given the current rates
of incarceration, in those states with the most restrictive voting
laws 40 percent of African American men are likely to be permanently
disenfranchised during their lifetimes.
Disenfranchisement laws in the United States are a vestige
of medieval times in Europe, when criminal offenders were banished
from the community and suffered civil death. Such
individuals were deprived of property rights and could even be
subject to injury or death without consequence. In England, ex-offenders
could be stripped of their property, denied the right to bequeath
or inherit property, and barred from bringing suit or performing
other legal functions. English colonists brought many of these
conceptions with them to North America.
The Fifteenth Amendment to the US Constitution, enacted in
1870 following the Civil War and the Emancipation Proclamation
that declared slaves free men, declared: The right of citizens
of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by
the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or
previous condition of servitude.
However, in the late nineteenth century, southern states adopted
restrictive voting rights in an effort to deny the franchise to
blacks and find a way around the Fifteenth Amendment. While laws
excluding ex-offenders had been on the books in these states all
along, between 1890 and 1910 southern state legislatures sought
to tailor them to increase their effect on blacks.
As with many other laws in the United States, legislation denying
voting rights to convicted felons and other offenders varies widely
from state to state. Until recently, four statesMaine, Massachusetts,
Utah and Vermontallowed convicted felons, including those
still incarcerated, to vote. In 1998, 80 percent of the Utah electorate
voted to deny prisoners the right to vote. An amendment to the
Massachusetts constitution was on the ballot in the current election
to strip inmates of their voting rights.
In 14 states, all in the South and West, ex-offenders who have
fully served their sentences are still denied the right to vote.
In 10 of these statesAlabama, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky,
Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, Virginia and Wyomingthese
individuals are disenfranchised for life.
In a number of states, ex-offenders can be denied the right
to vote for minor crimes or even for crimes for which they served
no prison time. In Mississippi, Sanford McLaughlin lost his right
to vote permanently after pleading guilty to the misdemeanor of
passing a bad $150 check. In California, Abran Ramirez was permanently
disenfranchised after serving a three-month sentence for robbery
and successfully completing 10 years of parole.
While in many states ex-offenders can technically regain their
right to vote following completion of their sentences or parole,
this possibility is more often than not illusory. In eight states
a pardon or order from the governor is required to regain voting
rights; in two states ex-offenders need approval from the state
parole or pardons board.
According to Human Rights Watch: Released ex-felons are
not routinely informed about the steps necessary to regain the
vote and often believeincorrectlythat they can never
vote again. Moreover, even if they seek to have the vote restored,
few have the financial and political resources needed to succeed.
In Mississippi, for example, in order to regain voting rights
an ex-convict must either secure an executive order from the governor
or get a state legislator to introduce a bill on his or her behalf.
Two-thirds of each house of the state legislature must then vote
for it, and the governor then sign it. In practice, such protracted
and costly mechanisms are reserved for the wealthiest and most
influential ex-felons.
Attorney Andrew Shapiro, who has studied criminal disenfranchisement,
commented: An eighteen-year-old first-time offender who
trades a guilty plea for a lenient non-prison sentence (as almost
all first-timers do, whether or not they are guilty) may unwittingly
sacrifice forever his right to vote.
In the late eighteenth century in the newly independent United
States, suffrage was denied to women, slaves, illiterates, and
people without property. In the first national elections of the
twenty-first century, 3.9 million adults, or approximately 2 percent
of eligible voters, are being punitively and arbitrarily denied
this democratic right.
See Also:
US
Elections
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |