|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : World
Economy
Economic instability dominates South East Asia
By Joe Lopez
29 September 2000
Use
this version to print
While recent large falls in Asian stock markets have been attributed
to rising oil prices and declines on Wall Street, some analysts
are pointing to more fundamental problems that could see a repeat
of the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98.
A recent article in the Australian Financial Review,
for example, questioned optimistic predictions for economic growth
by the World Bank and the Asia Development Bank and warned that
the Asian economic recovery remains very fragile.
In circumstances eerily similar to those played out in
mid-1997, it said, South East Asia is once again emerging
as the weak link in the region's economic chain.
It noted that while the latest gross domestic product (GDP)
figures from Thailand showed that the economy grew at an annual
rate of 6.6 percent in the second quarter, domestic demand had
well and truly turned south.
The Thai government recently dropped its forecast growth for
2000 from 5.1 percent to 4.1 percent, the third such downward
revision since the beginning of the year.
In a further indication of economic problems, the Thai composite
stock exchange index has fallen by more than 40 percent since
the start of the year. According to the Deutsche Bank's chief
economist for Asia, Michael Spencer, most of the growth in Thailand
appears to be coming from government spending and exports, neither
of which is sustainable.
Thailand is not the only economy with problems. Spencer pointed
out that in the Philippines the government is confronted with
a blowout in its fiscal deficit, with the International Monetary
Fund threatening not to release the final installment of a $314
million from a loan of $1.4 billion.
For those who were on hand to see the Philippine debacle
of 1999, the situation is beginning to evoke an eerie sense of
déjà vu, he said.
The Philippines budget deficit surged to 69.78 billion pesos
in the January-August period, with predictions that it will reach
80-100 billion pesos, way beyond the government's official full
year target of 62.50 billion pesos.
Attacking the government's inaction, the head of Asia Pacific
research at Rabobank, Andrew Fung, spelt out the implications
for the Philippines financial markets if the deficit is not cut.
The market expects that the government will be trying
to rein in the deficit as we go through the remainder of the year.
But we hear nothing from the government in terms of policy reforms
or policy initiatives, whether on the revenue side or spending
side. In the absence of any news like that, the market will continue
to be very bearish on its assets.
Thailand and the Philippines have been both hard hit by rising
oil prices. They import the bulk of their oil requirements and
their currencies are weak in relation to the US dollar, the currency
in which oil prices are set.
Salomon Smith Barney's head of country research in the Philippines,
Edgardo del Rosario, commented: The prospect of rising international
crude prices does not bode well for emerging markets like the
Philippines. The Philippines imports nearly all of its crude oil
requirements, which in turn account for 47 percent of the country's
energy mix. The Philippines thus runs the risk of increasing inflationary
pressure, as well as worsening balance of payments.
According to calculations by Chase Manhattan Bank's Hong Kong-based
economist Joan Zhang, a $10 increase in the price of crude will
reduce Thailand's trade balance by around $2.4 billion. While
inflationary pressures remained benign, the expected decline in
the trade balance could add to the downward pressure on the currency
at a time when capital outflows continue to be high.
According to Nomura Asia, there has been an investment outflow
from Asia of $1.3 billion so far this year, with US investors
alone withdrawing as much as $80 million in a single week.
The World Bank's half-yearly report on East Asia, released
earlier this month, declared that the Asian economic crisis was
over. But it did point to factors that could trigger a slump,
including a slowdown in the US economy and continuing stagnation
in Japan. Many countries, it declared, are still suffering
from a triple legacy of heavy debt, skittish investors and greater
household insecurity.
If demand should suddenly collapse, companies that can
now pay their debt and are beginning to invest could quickly go
under, the report warned.
Besides Thailand and the Philippines, there are concerns over
the South Korean and Indonesian economies. The South Korean stock
market has fallen by 45 percent this year, pushed down by fears
that the massive debts in both countries are a source of financial
instability.
Earlier this month the South Korean stock market plummeted
by eight percent in one day following the announcement by Ford
that it would not purchase the debt-burdened Daewoo Motor Company.
Ford became convinced Daewoo was not worth the $6.8 billion
sale price after a close examination of its books. The South Korean
government is now looking to General Motors as a buyer with predictions
that Daewoo could go at a firesale price.
The Korean stock market index, the Kospi, hit an 18-month low
after Ford's decision. But it seems that the collapse of the deal
was not the only factor at work.
A banking analyst at ABN Amro, Scott Seo, pointed out that
Daewoo's return to the auction block had come at a bad time for
the economy. Patchy corporate governance and slowing reform
are scaring off foreign investors. Bankruptcies are anticipated
among second-tier chaebols in a few months as their bonds mature.
Investors are worried about a doomsday scenario.
The collapse of the Ford-Daewoo deal was described by Jim Simpson
of Platinum Asset Management as a symptom of Korea's mounting
economic problems.
That's a headline deal which didn't go through,
he said, but sentiment was head down before this. There's
been no real hard restructuring as a result of the Asian crisis.
It's been papered over. The currencies have been falling against
the US dollar and oil is denominated in US dollars and Korea is
at the cutting edge of that because its heavily indebted.
The South Korean government has announced it will inject a
further $45 billion into the ailing banking sector to stave off
a financial crisis, taking the total cost of publicly-funded bailouts
to $130 billion since late 1997.
In Indonesia, continued political turmoil is fuelling financial
instability, with the stock market index at a 17-month low. As
one investment banker remarked to the Financial Times:
We either like stable democracies or stable dictatorships.
It's uncertainty we don't like.
In an article entitled Indonesia slips further off investment
map the Financial Times noted that it was a truism
in financial circles that Indonesia was being judged purely
on political risk and market psychology.
If international aid is withdrawn as a consequence of the government's
failure to disarm militia groups in West Timor investor confidence
will decline still further.
Although Indonesia, as a member of the OPEC cartel, has benefited
from higher oil prices, the government is set to raise domestic
fuel prices by 12 percent next month to meet conditions set down
by the IMF for loans. Plans to lift prices earlier this year were
postponed after a wave of protests.
Contrary to the claims of recovery all the indications
are that the South East Asian economies, burdened with debt and
under constant pressure for corporate and financial restructuring,
amid stock market and currency turmoil, face a deepening economic
and political crisis.
See Also:
Japan's debt crisis hangs over
global economy
[14 July 2000]
The 1997-98
Asian economic meltdown
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |