ON THE
WSWS
Donate
to
the WSWS!
News Feed
Contact
the
WSWS
Editorial
Board
New
Today
News
& Analysis
Workers
Struggles
Arts
Review
History
Science
Polemics
Philosophy
Correspondence
Archive
About
WSWS
About
the ICFI
Help
Books
Online
OTHER
LANGUAGES
German
French
Italian
Russian
Polish
Czech
Serbo-Croatian
Spanish
Portuguese
Turkish
Sinhala-
Tamil
Indonesian
LEAFLETS
Download
in
PDF format
|
|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
Train bombing signals new UNITA offensive in Angola
By Chris Talbot
23 August 2001
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The latest reports put the number killed when a train was blown
up in Angola last week at 252. UNITA, the notoriously brutal organisation
led by Jonas Savimbi that has been fighting a civil war with the
Angolan government since 1975, claimed responsibility for the
attack.
The train hit a mine between the towns of Zenza and Dondo,
150 kilometres south-east of the Angolan capital, Luanda. The
train was carrying fuel that exploded and fire spread to the neighbouring
carriages. Of about 500 people that were on board, 165 were injured.
A UNITA spokesman claimed that the train was a legitimate target,
as it was carrying arms and military supplies and had a large
military and police escort. However, survivors told the press
that there were only a small number of soldiers guarding the train.
Military escorts are standard procedure on transport in Angola.
Reports state that UNITA militia gunned down civilians fleeing
from the train.
The train attack is the biggest operation mounted by UNITA
since it was routed by the forces of the MPLA government in 1999.
According to BBC news reports, UNITA has managed to regroup since
then, using guerrilla tactics to hit at areas throughout the country,
including the coastal regions where the government is well established.
Recent reports include the killing of 80 people in an attack on
the town of Caxito, east of Luanda, the abduction of 60 children
from an orphanage, as well as attacks on the towns of Uige, Cacuso
east of Malange and Menongue in southern Cuando Cubango province.
UNITA forces move into towns long enough to seize weapons,
food and clothing then pull out before the Angolan army can respond.
In the central highlands region, the centre of UNITAs operations
in the 1990s, while it no longer controls the towns, UNITA continues
to raid villages and loot crops. Although there are supposed to
be UN sanctions in place, UNITA is estimated to still be earning
$100 million a year from the sale of diamonds from its mining
operations and can purchase weapons to compliment the arms it
seizes in guerrilla operations.
Control over the areas UNITA captured in the 1970s and 1980s
was maintained by kidnapping children and young people, with males
forcibly recruited into its army and girls being enslaved as wives.
Some women were publicly burnt as witches and discipline was enforced
by torture, imprisonment in deep pits and killings. Another characteristic
of Savimbis methods is that all potential rivals, and anyone
challenging his authority, are systematically murdered. As a result
of the war with UNITA, normal economic life in much of Angola
has all but disintegrated. Since 1975, an estimated 500,000 people
have been killed and 100,000 mutilated, mainly by mines that have
been laid in many areas of the countryside. Four million people
out of a population of 12 million remain displaced from their
homes and are forced to rely on international food aid.
After the collapse of the 1994-98 peace process, the MPLA government,
equipped with a 90,000-strong army and billions of dollars worth
of arms bought with its oil wealth (Angola is second only to Nigeria
in West Africas oil production), moved to finish off UNITA.
In 1999, UNITAs main southern base at Jamba was destroyed
and its forces were finally driven out of their main bases in
the central highlands. However, the Angolan government is now
apparently retreating from the position it held two years ago
that UNITA could be defeated militarily. In May this year, Angolan
President José Eduardo Dos Santos called for a route
to peace and for a dialogue with UNITA.
After the failure to secure a peace agreement with UNITA in
the 1990s, as the Economist magazine recently put it: the
UN not only cast UNITA in the role of villain but completely ostracised
it. The Angolan government, as the lesser of two evils, was supported
in its stated refusal ever to negotiate with Mr Savimbi...
The fact that two years later UNITA has been able to revive
its forces clearly demands an explanation. A brief consideration
of the history of the civil war shows how this vile organisation
has survived for the last 26 years, and sheds some light on its
present fortunes.
The MPLA came to power in 1975, after the collapse of the fascist
regime in Portugal and the collapse of Portuguese colonies in
Africa, including Angola. By 1976 the MPLA, with backing from
Cuban troops but also with widespread support in the population
for its struggle against Portuguese colonialism, had virtually
wiped out UNITAs forces. But UNITA was rebuilt by the South
African apartheid regime, supported by the United States. In 1979,
UNITAs headquartersthe size of a small townwas
paid for and built from scratch in Jamba, in the far southeast
of Angola, and Savimbi was based there for the next 13 years.
South African troops not only trained UNITA forces, but also carried
out invasions and sabotage with their own troops. During the Cold
War, millions of dollars from the CIA and South Africa went on
supporting UNITA against an MPLA government that was regarded
as communist because it received limited support from
Cuba and the Soviet Union.
Despite UNITAs brutal methods becoming well known, US
support continued into the 1990s. As journalist Victoria Brittain
explains in her book Death of Dignity (Pluto Press,
1998), the move of the Western powers away from supporting the
apartheid regime in South Africa in the late 1980s did not mean
abandoning UNITA.
The South Africans left Angola in 1988, and by the end of that
year a deal was brokered by the US for Cuban troops to pull out
in exchange for South Africa granting independence to Namibia.
Without South African support UNITA would have collapsed. In 1989,
under the Bush administration, US financial support to UNITA increased
to a record high of $50 million. From a special centre at Kamina
in Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo), US planes made
as many as three flights a day to UNITAs bases shipping
huge amounts of military equipment and support.
In 1991, with the war at a stalemate, the Western powers brought
Savimbi and Dos Santos to Portugal to sign the Bicesse Accord,
under which both sides agreed to disarm and demobilise their armies.
Multi-party elections would then take place monitored by the UN.
Following the pattern of the collapse of Stalinist regimes in
Eastern Europe, the US administration apparently believed that
the MPLA would lose all support and that their favourite, Savimbi,
would easily win the elections. But despite Savimbis public
relations machine and vote rigging in the eighth of the country
run by UNITA, the MPLA won the 1992elections.
Under constant pressure from the US, the UN team supervising
the elections and the provisions of the Bicesse agreement ignored
the fact that whilst the MPLA had demobilised their forces, UNITA
had only demobilised a tiny proportion of its troops and kept
hold of all its armaments. Within two weeks of the election, UNITA
had seized a third of the country. Whilst in public the US administration
said it was taking an even-handed approach, criticising
both sides for opposing national reconciliation, it continued
to back UNITA, which was taking over all the main towns and cities
of Angola, even attempting to seize the capital Luanda. Within
three months, UNITA had driven the government forces out of two
thirds of the country, the result of an obviously well planned
operation.
The MPLA had to rely on volunteers to try and repel the attempted
coup. It was not until June 1993 that the Clinton administration
lifted its arms embargo on the MPLA government, and even then,
with more than 1,000 people a day dying in the war, the UN postponed
taking sanctions against UNITA. It took until the autumn of 1993
before the MPLA built up a new army and began to push UNITA back,
and another year before the MPLA could drive UNITA out of Angolas
second city Huambo. US officials in Luanda even tried to persuade
the MPLA to leave Savimbi in charge of the city and agree to a
cease-fire.
Under pressure from the US and the UN, the MPLA government
accepted the Lusaka Accords in 1994. In spite of all that had
happened, UNITA were again treated as equalswhose
forces would be incorporated into a new national army, UNITA leaders
joining the government and Savimbi given a leading role, possibly
as vice-president. UN-brokered peace negotiations then continued
for a further four years, with Savimbi repeatedly ignoring the
Accords, continuing the war in the countryside and devastating
the whole country.
The role of the MPLA in the tragedy that has overtaken Angola
should not be passed over in silence. In the 1970s and 80s the
leaders of this organisation claimed to be Marxists.
Their programme was, in fact, bourgeois nationalist. They advocated
limited nationalisations, especially of the oil industry, as part
of an effort to build up a national economy that had a measure
of protection from Western imperialism by relying on support from
the Soviet Union. When the USSR collapsed, however, the MPLA rapidly
followed the leaders of Mozambique, Zimbabwe and the exiled ANC
leaders from South Africa in fully embracing the capitalist market,
as well as IMF and World Bank programmes. Desperate to win acceptance
from the US and Western powers, they accepted the Bicesse and
then the Lusaka Agreements, even though they were aware of UNITAs
continued operations.
The MPLA has proved unable to mobilise support amongst the
mass of the people, which would be needed to deal a decisive blow
to UNITA. Over the last period, despite the privations suffered
by the Angolan population, the MPLA elite has grown wealthy on
the spoils siphoned off the oil revenues. Numerous reports from
aid agencies document the refusal of the government to spend any
significant amount of its revenues on food and heath-care for
the population. A recent report from UNICEF pointed out that 30
percent of Angolan children die before they reach the age of five,
less than half even receive basic education and polio is on the
increase.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |