|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: East
Timor
US approved 1975 Indonesian invasion of East Timor
By Frank Gaglioti
19 December 2001
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Previously secret documents published by the National Security
Archive at George Washington University prove that the United
States government gave the green light for the 1975 Indonesian
invasion of East Timor, which resulted in the deaths of some 200,000
Timorese people over the ensuing quarter century.
At the Archives request, the Gerald R. Ford Presidential
Library released two key declassified documents revealing the
role of President Ford and his Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.
The Archive posted them on its web site on December 6, accompanied
by five previously unpublished State Department documents.
The documents expose the official silence and outright lies
advanced over the past 26 years to deny that Ford and Kissinger
were involved in, and ultimately responsible for, the atrocities
carried out by the Indonesian military dictatorship.
It had been known previously that Ford and Kissinger held a
discussion with General Suharto in Jakarta on the day before Indonesias
full-scale invasion on December 7, 1975. But the precise content
of the meeting has never been revealed. It was always obvious
that Ford and Kissinger must have sanctioned the invasion, yet
Kissinger explicitly denied this.
By the time that Ford and Kissinger visited Jakarta, the Indonesian
military had already made several incursions into East Timor,
the most notorious being in the border town of Balibo on October
16, 1975. Five Australian-based journalists in Balibo had been
killed by the Indonesian military in an effort to prevent wide
reportage of the attack.
According to a briefing note accompanying the documents, written
by William Burr and Michael L. Evans from the National Security
Archive, the final invasion, code-named operation Komodo, was
originally scheduled for early December 1975, but was apparently
delayed until after Ford and Kissingers visit.
The released documents, dating from July 1975 to June 1976,
reveal a series of exchanges between Ford, Suharto and Kissinger
and a number of internal US discussions concerning East Timor,
following the 1974 collapse of the Caetano dictatorship in Portugal,
the colonial ruler of the half island for four centuries.
They show that as early as July 1975, Ford had given Suharto
a clear enough signal that if the Indonesian regime annexed the
territory, Washington would stand by its ally, its most valued
in South East Asia. The subsequent documents confirm this secret
understanding, which became increasingly explicit.
Revealing documents
Document 1, dated July 5 1975, is the record of a discussion
between Ford and Suharto held at Camp David in the United States.
The two leaders met just two months after the final US defeat
in Vietnam, discussing their joint interests in suppressing political
and ideological ferment in South East Asia. Suharto sought increased
US military and intelligence assistance. He also bluntly declared
that there was no alternative to incorporating East Timor, and
labelled the Timorese political groups calling for independence
as Communist-influenced.
Apparently encouraged by his meeting with Ford, Suharto returned
home to make his first public statement declaring that an independent
East Timor was not viable.
Document 2, dated August 12 1975, outlines a discussion held
by Kissinger and some of his senior staff. A coup had been reported
in East Timor but it was unclear whether the pro-Portuguese Democratic
Union of Timorese or the pro-independence Fretilin had taken control.
Kissinger commented: It is quite clear that the Indonesians
are going to take over the island sooner or later.
Documents 3 and 3a, from November 1975, are memoranda that
Kissinger prepared for Ford. After outlining the full extent of
the Indonesian manoeuvres to take control of East Timor, Kissinger
clearly anticipated an Indonesian invasion, and alerted Ford to
a potential problemthe use of US-supplied weaponry (US law
required such arms to be used only for self-defence).
A merger with Indonesia is probably the best solution
for the colony if the inhabitants agree, he advised. Indonesian
use of US-supplied weapons in an overt occupation of the territory,
however, would contravene US law. We have quietly pointed this
out to the GOI (Government of Indonesia), and it appears to have
been a restraining factor.
Document 4, dated December 6, is perhaps the most revealing.
It is the official transcript of the discussion in Jakarta between
Ford, Suharto and Kissinger on the day before the full invasion.
It clearly records Suharto requesting, and receiving, Ford and
Kissingers agreement to the takeover.
Suharto: We want your understanding if we deem it necessary
to take rapid or drastic action.
Ford: We will understand and will not press you on the
issue. We understand the problems you have and the intentions
you have.
Kissinger: You appreciate that the use of US made arms
could create problems. ... It depends on how we construe it, whether
it is in self defense or is (it) a foreign operation. It is important
that whatever you do succeeds quickly. We would be able to influence
the reaction in America if whatever happens happens after we return.
Kissingers remarks make it clear that he and Ford were
not opposed to the use of US arms. Their only concern was that
the attack be delayed until after they had left Indonesia and
that it be carried through as quickly and effectively as possible.
They undertook to manipulate public opinion in the US.
Document 5, dated December 5 and 6, provides a schedule of
Kissingers two days in Indonesia. He met Indonesian Foreign
Minister Adam Malik, yet no record of that meeting has been found.
After the invasion, the Ford administration ostensibly delayed
new arms sales to Indonesia, pending a six-month State Department
review. In their briefing note, Burr and Evans document how military
equipment already in the pipeline continued to flow to Suharto
during the review, and the US made four new offers of military
equipment.
At a meeting on December 18, 1975 Kissinger chastised his staff
for writing a memo recommending that arms sales to Indonesia be
cut off. Kissinger was angry that word might leak out that Kissinger
overruled his pristine bureaucrats and violated the law.
Document 6 is a transcript of a June 17, 1976 staff meeting
between Kissinger and his State Department bureau chiefs. The
meeting recommended against sending a representative to accompany
an Indonesian parliamentary delegation to East Timor. Philip Habib,
under secretary of state for political affairs, commented that
theres no need to take this action ...Weve resumed,
as you know, all of our normal relations with them; and there
isnt any problem involved.
Cynically, Kissinger responded: Not very willingly. Illegally
and beautifully. Kissinger did not elaborate, at least according
to the transcript, but the context made his meaning plain. While
Suhartos use of American weaponry caused some temporary
political problems, the administration had overcome them illegally
and beautifully. As Burr and Evans note, Kissingers
remark was an apparent reference to the continuing arms
sales, his deception of Congress, or possibly to Indonesias
bloody invasion and occupation.
The Indonesian invasion
An estimated 20,000 Indonesian troops were deployed in East
Timor in the first month of the invasion alone. Casualty estimates
vary, but 60,000 to 100,000 Timorese were probably killed within
12 months. By 1980, some estimates put the number who died from
military action, starvation or disease as high as 230,000.
In January 1976, an unnamed US State Department official told
the Australian newspaper that in terms of the bilateral
relations between the US and Indonesia, we are more or less condoning
the incursion into East Timor ... The United States wants to keep
its relations with Indonesia close and friendly. We regard Indonesia
as a friendly, non-aligned nationa nation we do a lot of
business with.
For two decades, however, Kissinger and Ford maintained a complete
public silence on their role. It is not mentioned in their memoirs.
When finally forced to answer a question at a 1995 press conference
in New York, Kissinger lied brazenly. Timor was never discussed
with us when we were in Indonesia, he claimed. He then qualified
this comment by stating that he learned about the invasion plans
at the airport as the presidential party was about to leave. He
made a similar statement in a March 1999 radio interview.
East Timor was not an isolated chapter in US policy. In 1965-66,
at the onset of the Vietnam War and fearing the development of
social revolution in South East Asia, the US government and the
CIA backed and help organise Suhartos bloody coup. Up to
one million workers and peasants were murdered within months.
US ambassador Marshall Green and the CIA supplied the death lists
of top Communist Party members and supporters.
Suhartos repressive regime became one of Washingtons
most vital strategic and political assets. Apart from being a
highly lucrative source of oil, gas, rubber and other raw materials,
and sitting astride the shipping lanes between the Indian and
Pacific Oceans, Indonesia was regarded as a bulwark against political
unrest among the Asian masses. In 1975, its critical importance
was heightened by the US defeat in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia.
The documents show Kissinger making only one passing reference
to the Australian government, another regional ally, but their
contents shed further light on the part played by the Whitlam
Labor government. In two summit meetings with Suharto in 1974
and 1975, Prime Minister Gough Whitlam made it crystal clear that
his government would turn a blind eye to any invasion of East
Timor. It is inconceivable that he would have done so without
knowing Washingtons stance and acting accordingly.
Neither Ford nor Kissinger has issued a statement on the latest
documents. The mass media has barely mentioned the revelations.
Brief reports appeared without comment in the Washington Post
and several Australian newspapers. Prominent liberal newspapers
such as the New York Times have written nothing. None of
the media have called for Ford or Kissinger to be indicted for
war crimes.
To raise the issue would undermine the ideological basis of
the current Bush administrations so-called war against
terrorism. The White House and Pentagon claim to be motivated
by concerns for the security, liberty and democracy of ordinary
people in America and internationally. The Timor documents demonstrate
that US governments pursue their strategic and commercial interests
with brutal indifference to the fate of the masses of people,
whether in Timor, Afghanistan or anywhere else.
The East Timorese leadership, totally dependent on aid and
investment from the Western powers, including the US and Australia,
is also keen to bury the past. Xanana Gusmao, who is touted in
the media as the territorys future president, rejected suggestions
that he should ask for a US apology. East Timor, in the
situation it faces, must be engaged in looking towards the future,
not to the past, he stated. He insisted that the US had
played an important role in East Timor. Gusmao was
on his way to a so-called donors conference in Oslo where
the major powers were to determine what aid, if any, they would
give East Timor.
See Also:
Documents reveal that
Australia urged Indonesia to invade East Timor in 1975
[18 September 2001]
The Western powers
and East Timor: A history of manoeuvre and intrigue
[1 October 1999]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |