|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
"The Ghost of Christmas Past"
Report shows health gap between Britain's rich and poor still
as marked as in Dickens' day
By Keith Lee
29 January 2001
Use
this version to print
A paper published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) just
before the Christmas holiday shows that the health gap between
rich and poor is as wide today as it was in Charles Dickens' time.
The authors of The Ghost of Christmas Past: health effects
of poverty in London in 1896 and 1991argue their study shows
that the passage of 100 years has had almost no impact on
the patterns of inequality in inner London and on the relationship
between people's socio-economic position and their relative chance
of dying.
The paper begins with a quote from Dickens' book A Christmas
Carol, written 150 years ago, describing Scrooge's journey
with the Spirit of Christmas Yet to Come:
"They [left the busy scene] and went into an obscure part
of town where Scrooge had never penetrated before, although he
recognised its situation and its bad repute. The ways were foul
and narrow: the shops and houses wretched: the people half-naked,
drunken, slipshod and ugly. Alleys and archways like so many cesspools
disgorged their offences of smell and dirt, and life upon the
struggling streets and the whole quarter reeked with crime, with
filth and misery".
The study compares the extent to which patterns of mortality
in London at the end of the 20th century can be predicted from
late 19th century patterns of poverty in the capital.
The authors take their starting point from the groundbreaking
social survey conducted by Charles Booth in 1886, which he then
massively expanded over the following years. Booth, a wealthy
English ship owner and social reformer, published his survey in
17 volumes as the Life and Labour of the People of London
between 1889 and 1903.
Booth spent a great deal of his own money on the project and
his findings were produced with the aid of a series of poverty
maps, giving a street-by-street picture of deprivation in
the capital. His survey showed that more than 31 percent of London's
population lived in poverty, and he became a staunch advocate
of state support for the needy and the introduction of an old
age pension.
The BMJ paper matches Booth's poverty maps to modern-day records
based on the 1991 census, and in doing so is able to compare patterns
of social deprivation.
"For many causes of death in London, measures of deprivation
made around 1896 and 1991 both contributed strongly to predicting
the current spatial distribution. Contemporary mortality from
diseases which are known to be related to deprivation in early
life (stomach cancer, stroke, lung cancer) is predicted more strongly
by the distribution of poverty in 1896 than that in 1991.
The authors looked at one streetProvidence Place, in
Islington, North Londonto see if conditions had altered
much over the course of a century. They noted that although the
number of people living there had fallen, and that an open drain
had been covered over, the social position of Providence
Place in the geographical ranking of London streets remains much
the same.
The status of many London districts has changed little since
Dickens' day: Millionaires' Row can still be found
in the wealthy suburbs of Hampstead and the East End remains largely
synonymous with poverty and poor housing. The gentrification
of some London boroughs only means that the pool of affordable
housing for those on average or low incomes has become even smaller.
The study concluded that it remained a fundamental social fact
that people living in poverty-stricken neighbourhoods would die
earlier than those living in rich areas. This fact was "so
robust that a century of change... has failed to disrupt it."
Danny Dorling, one of the paper's authors and Professor of
Quantitative Human Geography at Leeds University told the press,
"The most remarkable thing is how 100 years of social policy
have failed to narrow the gap between rich and poor. All the 1906
Liberal government of Lloyd George and the 1945 Labour government
achieved were to prevent it getting wider."
This research paper is only the latest to highlight the growth
in social inequality and its link to poor health and mortality.
In 1999, Dorling and others undertook a comprehensive study entitled
the Widening Gap, looking at the period 1981-96. Their
findings revealed an even greater mortality gap based on social
class than had previously been reported.
Dorling and his fellow researchers have been critical of the
Labour government's claims to be reducing health inequalities.
In a letter to the BMJ following Labour criticism of their 1999
study, Dorling and his co-workers said, "We suggest that
on current evidence the government is doing little to reduce inequalities
in material standards of living.
Their letter concluded, If the government's commitment
to reducing inequalities is to be fulfilled a more concerted effort
to reduce poverty and income inequalities is needed. The government
has reluctantly agreed to increase the national minimum wage but
by less than the increase in average earnings and hence the income
gap will continue to grow. Benefits and pensions need also to
be increased so that people who cannot work can share in the increased
wealth and prosperity that most people in Britain are enjoying.
One of the most vulnerable groups to suffer poor health and
above average mortality rates is the homeless. Labour's establishment
of a rough-sleepers unit headed by a so-called Homelessness
Tsar was supposed to herald an improvement in the conditions
of those forced to sleep on the streets. Launching its winter
appeal for the homeless, the charity Crisis said of the 800 people
who had slept in their shelters, 134 had gone 12 months without
medical treatment. They confirmed that the homeless were much
more likely to suffer from ailments such as tuberculosis, heart
problems and diabetes. When the charity said that there were still
not enough beds to house all the homeless, the government accused
it of scare mongering.
The BMJ paper concludes, The key message of A Christmas
Carol that redistribution of wealth reduces inequalities
in mortalityis as relevant today as when it was written
150 years ago; the fact that inequalities in health persist and
match the 19th century pattern of inequalities in wealth so well,
suggests that the message has yet to be heeded.
New Labour has shown itself to have very deaf ears on this
issue. Indeed, its policies are actively increasing the gap between
the rich and poor, a fact that is confirmed in the latest release
of the government's own Social Trends statistics,
which showed income differences had widened under Labour.
When he came to power, Prime Minister Tony Blair pledged that
his government would "think the unthinkable". He has
been true to his promise. Labour has pursued with a vengeance
the same free market policies started by Thatcher and continued
under the Major Conservative government. Despite its call to end
child poverty "within a generation," Labour has attacked
so-called expensive welfare provisions. The latest Social Trends
figures show that 25 percent of all children in Britain today
live in low-income households.
* * *
The BMJ paper The Ghost of Christmas Past: health effects
of poverty in London in 1896 and 1991 can be viewed at http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7276/1547
Two useful sites about Charles Booth:
http://booth.lse.ac.uk/
http://mubs.mdx.ac.uk/Staff/Personal_pages/Ifan1/Booth/
See Also:
London's Hackney Council to impose £58m
cuts package
[16 January 2001]
New survey shows widespread
deprivation in Britain
[27 September 2000]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |