|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Bush administration widens reach of federal death penalty
By Kate Randall
23 June 2001
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The week before the execution of Oklahoma City bomber Timothy
McVeigh, Attorney General John Ashcroft issued new guidelines
for US attorneys that make it easier to bring capital prosecutions
in states which do not have the death penalty.
Presently, 12 states and the District of Columbia do not practice
capital punishment. None of the 18 men now on federal death row
come from these states, and over the last decade very few capital
cases were prosecuted in states without the death penalty.
For more than 200 years in the US, federal prosecution which
could result in a death sentence was allowable for a limited range
of offenses, including espionage, murder on federal property,
murder in the course of a bank robbery, interstate kidnapping
and presidential assassination.
The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 extended the reach of the federal
death penalty, allowing it in cases involving drug-related murders.
Juan Raul Garza, who was executed on June 19, was tried under
this law. Three other men presently on federal death row were
prosecuted under the 1998 act.
In 1994 Congress passed the Federal Death Penalty Act, which
greatly expanded the number of crimes for which a defendant could
be executed. These included killing in the course of another serious
offense, a prior criminal history of serious violent offenses,
homicide involving planning and premeditation, multiple killings,
or endangering the lives of others during the commission of a
crime. Non-homicide offenses, such as treason and espionage, are
also included. Fifteen men currently on death row received their
death sentences as a consequence of this act, passed under the
Clinton administration.
Federal law says that when state and federal governments both
have jurisdiction to prosecute a crime, the federal government
should only take those cases where substantial federal interest
is involved. Under former Attorney General Janet Reno very few
federal capital cases were prosecuted in states that banned the
death penalty.
Under Ashcrofts new guidelines, US attorneys are instructed
to consider whether the appropriate punishment upon conviction
for an offense is available in the state. In other words, if a
defendant cannot receive a death sentence under state laws, the
federal government can seek jurisdiction to prosecute a crime
as a capital case.
These new guidelines seek to circumvent state laws that have
outlawed capital punishment, in some cases since the nineteenth
century. David I. Bruck of the Federal Death Penalty Resource
Counsel Project called the federal move the nationalization
of the death penalty.
Until the executions of Timothy McVeigh and Juan Garza this
month, there had been no federal executions since 1963. By contrast,
since the US Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1977,
the 38 states that practice capital punishment have put more than
700 people to death. The number of federal prisoners currently
facing death sentences18is also very small compared
to the more than 3,700 condemned inmates on state death rows.
Recent polls show that opposition to capital punishment in
the American population is growing, with support for the practice
down to as low as 50 percent according to several new studies.
The Bush administration, however, is moving to accelerate the
process. With the resumption of federal executions this month,
the government has opened up a new arena for the death penalty
which had been off limits for 38 years.
See Also:
Execution Day in America
[13 June 2001]
Second US federal execution set for Tuesday
morning
[19 June 2001]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |