|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
First tentative talks between India and Pakistan in two years
By Sarath Kumara
9 June 2001
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email
For the first time in more than two years, talks have been
scheduled in July between India and Pakistan. While no formal
agenda has been announced, the main item of discussion will undoubtedly
be the long-running conflict between the two countries over the
status of Kashmir.
The Indian government announced in late May that it had made
an invitation to the Pakistani military ruler, General Pervez
Musharraf, to visit to India for direct talks on bilateral
issues. The decision was taken at a meeting of the high-level
Indian Cabinet Committee on Security chaired by Prime Minister
Atal Behari Vajpayee and attended by top defence and security
ministers.
In a letter to Musharraf, Vajpayee appealed for mutual goodwill.
Our common enemy is poverty, he wrote. For the
welfare of our peoples, there is no recourse but a pursuit of
the path of reconciliation. The words, however, were belied
by the fact that the same ministerial meeting called an end to
a unilateral Indian ceasefire in the province of Jammu and Kashmir
in place since last December.
Musharraf wrote to Vajpayee accepting the invitation with
great pleasure, saying that Pakistan has always sought
to establish tension-free and cooperative relations with India.
At the same time, however, the Pakistani Foreign Minister Abdul
Sattar told a press conference that by ending the ceasefire the
Indian government had given the Indian forces a carte blanche
to continue state terrorism against the Kashmiri people.
The meeting will be the first since February 1999 when Vajpayee
went to Lahore to meet prime minister Nawaz Sharif. Any prospect
for further talks collapsed when later in the same year Pakistani-backed
separatist guerrillas crossed over into Indian-held Jammu and
Kashmir and seized strategic high points in the Kargil area. Bitter
fighting with Indian troops left more than 1,000 combatants dead
on both sides.
Under pressure from the US administration, Sharif withdrew
support from the separatists forcing their withdrawal from the
area. Sharif's backdown was one of the reasons for his ouster
by Musharraf and the army in October 1999. Since then the Indian
government has repeatedly ruled out any negotiations with Pakistan
unless it stops cross border terrorism by the Pakistan-based
groups.
During the six-month ceasefire, some of the Kashmiri separatist
groups had called for tri-partite talks involving India, Pakistan
and their own leaders but India categorically ruled out the possibility.
Others such as Lashkar-e-Taiba denounced the Indian ceasefire
as a ruse and continued their attacks on Indian security forces.
India's ceasefire, which coincided with the usual lull in fighting
during winter, was calculated to appease the demands of the major
powers, the US in particular, for steps towards a negotiated solution
to the decades-long conflict. Pakistan responded by indicating
that it would avoid clashes along the Line of Control that separates
Jammu and Kashmir from Pakistani-held areas of Kashmir.
Both Pakistan and India are under pressure to negotiate from
the US and Europe, which regard the rivalry over Kashmir by the
subcontinent's two nuclear-armed powers as a dangerously destabilising
factor in the region. Since the Kargil fighting, Washington has
markedly shifted away from its Cold War ally, Pakistan, in favour
of closer economic and strategic ties with New Delhi.
In making his invitation to Musharraf, Vajpayee no doubt calculates
that growing US support for India will put his government in a
strong bargaining position to extract concessions from Islamabad,
including the reining in of separatist groups that operate from
Pakistani-controlled territory.
The Indian security forces maintain a huge military presence
in Jammu and Kashmir and routinely utilise repressive measures
against separatist guerrillas and anyone thought to sympathise
with their demands. According to police, more than 120 people
including guerrillas, Indian soldiers and civilians have died
since the end of the ceasefire on May 23. An Asia Times
report indicates that seven young Kashmiri detainees either died
or sustained serious injuries while detained in police custody
in May.
At least 30,000 people have died in the conflict since 1989.
Dr Naseer Ahmad Shah told the Kashmir.co.uk website that
people definitely want a change, they are tired of uncertainty
they want peace. The article noted that an estimated 100,000
children have been orphaned by the crisis. Many have been traumatised
by their experience. Others are forced to work as child labourers
in order to survive.
US signals a proactive stance
The US and Europe have welcomed India's invitation to Musharraf.
In his first major statement on South Asia before the Senate Appropriations
Committee on May 25, US Secretary of State Colin Powell stated
that the Bush administration intended to take a more proactive
stance on Kashmir, encouraging both India and Pakistan to find
a peaceful and just solution.
While India has previously ruled out an international intervention
in the Kashmir dispute, its closer relations with Washington may
compel New Delhi to accept greater US involvement.
The US State Department held a high-level strategy conference
on Kashmir in early May. Organised by its Bureau of Intelligence
and Research, the meeting called to thrash out US tactics was
presided over by former US ambassador to India Frank Weisner and
was attended by US officials and diplomats.
In early May, President Bush also invited Musharraf to visit
the US for discussions on political, economic and security
issues pertaining to the South Asian region. The timing
of the tripin July, in the same month as the India-Pakistan
talksindicates that the US intends to use the opportunity
to exert pressure on Musharraf.
Pakistan is not in a strong position. Not only is it increasingly
isolated internationally but its economy is in a shambles. The
country has seen a huge 74 percent decline in foreign direct investment
since June 2000. Pakistani Finance Minister Shaukat Aziz bluntly
told a recent economic conference: A lot of political and
geo-politics issues impact on economics. A peaceful environment
will help the economy grow.
Kashmiri separatist groups have been divided over the India-Pakistan
talks. The militant Pakistani-based Hizbul-Mujahedeen has hailed
the decision to hold negotiations as a breakthrough
in resolving the conflict. The All Parties Hurriyat Conference,
an umbrella organisation of separatist groups, has also tentatively
welcomed India's initiative. Both groups, however, have insisted
that they must be involved in discussions if there is to be any
solution.
A number of Islamic fundamentalist groups have denounced the
talks. Lashkar-e-Taiba, which carried out many of the attacks
during the ceasefire, rejected the Indian offer as an attempt
to weaken Jihad (holy war) in occupied Kashmir. The group
also warned Musharraf not to fall into the trap of soft
diplomacyan indication of the sharp pressures on the
Pakistani junta from Islamic extremists not to make any concessions
to India.
Vajpayee faces opposition from his own Hindu chauvinist Bharathiya
Janatha Party (BJP) and other Hindu communalist organisations.
Shiv Sena, Rastriya Swayamsevak Sang (RSS) and Vishva Hindu Parshad
(VHP), all of which have connections to the government, vehemently
criticised the prime minister for declaring the ceasefire in the
first place and oppose any compromise on Kashmir.
On May 29, a group of Hindu extremist protesters gathered in
New Delhi with an effigy of Musharraf with a noose around his
head, demanding he be arrested and hanged as the murderer...the
moment he comes to India. On the same day, Foreign Minister
Jaswant Singh signalled that India would be taking a tough stance
in any negotiations, telling a press conference that Kashmir
remains an integral part of India.
Any negotiations in July will remain highly tentative. Having
stirred up communal sentiment for decades, neither India nor Pakistan
can afford to make any overt concessions during the meeting.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |