|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Income report highlights vast inequality in the US
By Debra Watson
9 November 2001
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Recent Census Bureau reports on household income in the US
show that last year, despite an unprecedented 10-year economic
expansion, income inequality was at a post-World War II high.
Last year nearly half the total income49.7 percentwent
to the top 20 percent of households and just 3.6 percent to the
bottom 20 percent. The richest 5 percent of US householdsthose
making over $145,500raked in 21.9 percent of all income,
well above the 17.5 percent share recorded in 1967.
Such grotesque levels of inequality are characteristic of a
country torn by class divisions. It belies the picture presented
by the media and political establishment of a united America,
a theme most forcefully asserted in relation to the war on Afghanistan.
Moreover, the Census Bureau report is based on data collected
in the year 2000. Since then millions of workers joined the ranks
of the unemployed or suffered other losses of income due to the
economic recession.
The gap in household income and in individual earnings is far
greater today than at any time since the late 1960s. Since 1968,
the Gini Indexwhich measures inequalityhas risen from
.399 to .460. (The index ranges from 0which would mean all
families had the same incometo 1.000, if the entire nations
income was concentrated in the hands of one family.) The largest
jump in the index took place between 1980 and 2000, beginning
with the corporate offensive against the working class initiated
by the Reagan administration and culminating in the massive stock
market rise during the Clinton years.
Since 1990 only the top fifth of households have seen their
share of the national income rise, while the bottom four-fifths
suffered declines in their share. Last year the top 5 percent
of households earned eight times more than a family of four at
the poverty line of $17,463. Although most households saw an increase
in income during recent years, the majority were only modest gains.
Median income grew by 8.1 percent between 1989 and 2000. By contrast,
between 1959 and 1969, when increases in income were more evenly
distributed, the median household income rose 24 percent.
Real inequality is actually even higher than the Census Bureau
figures indicate. Critics point out the bureaus statistics
underestimate the share of national income going to the richest
Americans by excluding all incomes over $999,999. This means the
multimillion-dollar salaries of corporate executives are not factored
in when calculating income disparity in America. Moreover, capital
gains, which generated billions for the rich during the stock
market boom, are also not included.
According to the Congressional Budget Office, if tax returns
that capture this hidden income are used as an alternative measure,
the income of the wealthiest one-fifth of the US population grew
20.6 percent between 1993 and 1997 alone. This is more than twice
the 9.2 percent increase reported by the Census Bureau.
From 1993 to 2000 median earnings for men working full-time
year-round rose 4.4 percent and for women about 7 percent, according
to the Census Bureau. From 1999 to 2000, however, median income$42,148
per householdremained flat. Median earnings for full-time
year-round male workers actually fell for the first time in four
years, by a full percentage point.
The Census reports also show that last year more than one in
every ten people in the US lived below the official poverty line.
The poverty rate made a slow decline from over 15 percent in the
1980s to 11 percent in 2000, the lowest level since 1973. Nevertheless
there were 31.1 million people living in poverty last year, 8
million more than in 1973. Moreover, if the modest decline in
the official poverty rate was all that was possible during the
longest economic expansion in US history, what will become of
the tens of millions of at-risk families as the economy worsens?
Already nearly half44.5 percentof all poor families
had at least one full-time worker in 2000, up from 36 percent
in 1993.
Every measure of economic well-being shows that the working
class has not only failed to benefit from the stock market and
profits boom of the 1990s, but in many ways is actually worse
off. In none of the previous postwar recessions did US workers
face mass layoffs with their families in such a precarious financial
condition. In the past many workers could count on government
benefits as well as employer-sponsored support in industries such
as auto or steel to offset the impact of unemployment. Today it
is estimated less than 40 percent of the jobless will qualify
for the woefully inadequate unemployment benefits provided by
the government on a temporary basis.
The steady growth in the number of low-paid and part-time or
temporary workers over the past 20 years has contributed to a
situation where thousands of those laid off face immediate financial
ruin. Among this group are large numbers of the poor, mostly women
with children, who were pushed off welfare to work in low-paying
jobs. Many resorted to taking tenuous work situations that are
particularly vulnerable to layoffs. One estimate says only one
in five laid-off welfare leavers would qualify for
unemployment compensation. The limited protections of a social
safety net built up during the 1960s and 1970s have been gutted
by the 1996 welfare reform and by two decades of state and federal
budget cuts.
The latest Census Bureau figures further underscore the enormous
transfer of wealthfrom the working class to the wealthy
elitethat has taken place in America with the backing of
both political parties.
See Also:
Millions of unemployed finding US safety
net in shreds
[7 November 2001]
CEO pay soars as US stocks
plummet
[24 September 2001]
Ending welfare as we
know it spells poverty for millions of Americas working
poor
[31 August 2001]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |