|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific : Papua
New Guinea
Eye-witnesses confirm that police killed Papua New Guinea
students
By Will Marshall
15 October 2001
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
A government-appointed inquiry into the killing of four demonstrators
during student-led anti-privatisation protests in June has heard
overwhelming evidence, including eye-witness accounts, confirming
that police shot the protesters.
Public outrage over the shootings in the capital, Port Moresby,
forced the government of Prime Minister Mekere Morauta to establish
a commission of inquiry headed by former High Court judge Sir
Robert Kynnerseley Woods. The five-week inquiry concluded at the
end of September but its report has not yet been released.
Associate professor of law, Dr Luluaki testified that on the
night of June 25, police initially shot away from students after
chasing them to the University of Papua New Guinea (UPNG) but
changed their line of fire the next morning. About 6.30between
6.30 and 7 oclockI saw students being fired at and
I could actually see dust or soil being turfed up on the side
of the campus...
I saw one student being actually shot. When I saw that,
I yelled at the policemen, See what you have done to my
students now. You have shot them. They are now dead. What are
you going to do? You have shot my students. And one of those
policemen turned around and pointed his gun at me.
Tony Sua, a final year student, witnessed the shooting of fellow
student Steven Kil: One of them (the police), gave a signal
and simultaneously opened fire on us. These shots brought most
of the students down and Steven is not an exclusion. Before I
stepped back for cover, I could glance a gun fired. At that very
moment, I fell over with blood all over my right hand and the
chest. As far as I can recall, I called for help but everyone
was caring for his own life in the midst of teargas. Steven laid
motionless on the lawn.
Other eye-witnesses gave detailed accounts of the police shootings,
including several academics, a local resident, a worker for Telikomthe
national phone companyand a passerby who was shot in the
leg by police.
Police claimed that they shot in the air but Gibert Kerekere,
a phone worker who visited the scene several days later, said:
We stopped on the way and started checking out some of the
trees on the hillside where the students were shot. We noticed
a number of them had visible marks of bullets penetrating them
from various angles.
This evidence corroborated a report broadcast before the inquiry
by Australian Broadcasting Corporation journalist Richard Dinnen,
who noted: The grass here is littered with spent bullets.
The walls and windows are riddled with bullet holes.
The shootings occurred after Morautas government flew
in police mobile squads, renowned for their brutality, from Mt
Hagen and Rabaul to break up a six-day sit-in protest against
the governments wholesale privatisation of public services
and other Structural Adjustment Program measures dictated by the
World Bank and International Monetary Fund.
The student-led demonstrators blockaded government offices
and effectively shut down most of the capital, with no bus services
operating. Thousands of jobless youth and workers from the shantytowns
surrounding Port Moresby joined the protest, despite Morautas
attempt to discredit the students by denouncing them as the stooges
of unnamed opposition politicians. It was the second major challenge
within months to the World Bank-IMF program, following a two-week
army mutiny in March, triggered by a plan to slash the size of
the armed forces.
The mobile squads used a combination of tear-gas, beatings
and shooting into the air to disperse the peaceful crowd at the
government offices and then chased students back to the university,
killing four people and wounding 24 in the ensuing confrontations
in and near the campus.
Government cover-up
Despite the incontrovertible evidence, there is every indication
that the inquiry will whitewash the police killings and blame
the students for the deaths. According to the police version of
events, students fought among themselves, killing each other.
The National newspaper reported that Sarea Soi, the
counsel assisting the government and police, concluded: There
is no direct evidence of police shooting the deceased and the
victims. The injuries sustained by the demonstrators, if we are
to believe them, are in our view against the weight of the evidence.
A number of police officers also claimed that they acted in
self-defence, confronted by students armed with rocks, petrol
bombs and several guns. No other witnesses confirmed this. The
only physical evidence presented by police was a plastic bottle
with a wick and some petrol in it.
Laman Kapinias, a police officer from Mount Hagen, was asked:
How far away were the students from you and your fellow
policemen when they began throwing petrol bombs, sticks and stones?
Incredibly, he claimed that the students had been only five metres
away. Another policeman claimed he had been shot at three times.
But no police were shot, burnt or seriously injured at the campus.
By contrast, several students produced medical certificates showing
that they were injured by shotgun pellets.
These contradictions in the police evidence went largely unchallenged.
Instead, the inquiry concluded with the counsel assisting the
commission criticising the police, not for the shootings but for
failing to enforce the law more vigorously against the protesters.
Molean Kilepak condemned police for not arresting demonstrators
for harassment, intimidation and threatening behaviour. There
appeared to be no action or any attempt made against demonstrators
to protect or prevent incidents of breaches of constitutional
rights, he declared.
The final submission made by the counsel assisting an inquiry
is normally a good indication of the final findings. After five
weeks of hearings and the gathering of hundreds of pages of transcripts
of evidence and submissions, Woods announced that he would hand
his report to Morauta on October 2, allowing just four days to
review the evidence and write his report.
Morauta appears to have every confidence that the inquiry will
exonerate the police and his government. At the UPNG Alumni Association
Fundraising Dinner, held before inquiry ended, he renewed his
allegations that the protests were politically orchestrated. Some
of those concocting this poison teach and study at UPNG. They
are perverting the purpose of our university. The protest leaders
had one aim, and one aim onlyto force me to resign.
The government has not announced when the inquiry report will
be released and the media has dropped all references to it. It
seems that Morauta is waiting for an opportune moment to reveal
the findings, knowing that they may spark further unrest.
All the fundamental issues that gave rise to both the student-led
protest and the military mutiny remain. Because of popular opposition
and declining investor interest, the privatisation program has
fallen far behind schedule, but Morauta recently expressed confidence
that the PNG Banking Corporation would be sold off by the end
of the year. Under intense pressure from the World Bank and IMF,
the government is continuing to impose their policies.
An IMF review completed at the end of September praised Morautas
government for the remarkable achievement of implementing
a comprehensive program of economic adjustment and structural
reform in the face of a very difficult political and
economic environment. At the same time, IMF deputy managing
director Eduardo Aninat warned that the economy was in a weak
state and the IMFs program had proceeded at a slower
pace than anticipated.
See Also:
Papua New Guinea government
under siege after police kill three protesters
[29 June 2001]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |