|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
: Nigeria
Communal violence in Nigeria
By Barry Mason
19 September 2001
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Communal violence has broken out in the northern Nigerian city
of Jos in the Plateau region. It is a city of four million people,
125 miles from the capital Abuja. The fighting began on September
7 between youth belonging to the Christian Berom tribe and Muslim
Hausa youth.
Nigerian president Olusegun Obasanjo called out the army on
September 8 and a dusk to dawn curfew was imposed. On September
9, police sealed the borders of Plateau state, prohibiting travel
to and from the region. In spite of the curfew and the army and
police presence, clashes between the rival groups have continued.
The violence is reported to have escalated again following last
weeks terrorist attacks in New York and Washington.
Press reports state that more than 500 people having been killed
in a week of confrontations; however, officials are reluctant
to confirm such a figure. On Monday September 10, Phillip Macham,
a Red Cross official, said 165 bodies have been deposited
at various hospitals in Jos, he added that 900 people had
been injured.
Eyewitnesses report seeing bodies in the streets, some apparently
killed in clashes with the military. Roadblocks have been set
up and drivers killed if they happen to be from the wrong ethnic
group. Mobs armed with machetes have also been responsible for
deaths.
According to one version, the immediate spark was reported
to be an incident in which a woman tried to cross through a street
barrier where Muslim men had gathered to pray. An alternative
explanation being given is that Muslim youth torched a church.
Communal tensions in the city have been growing since the appointment
of a Muslim politician, Alhaji Mohammed Muktar, to a low-level
government post as chairman of a state poverty alleviation committee.
The other contender for the post was a Christian.
Muktars appointment exacerbated rivalry between the Berom,
the dominant group and the Jasawa, a Hausa group, who have recently
moved into the area and are vying for political influence.
In the last year, Christians leaving the majority Muslim state
of Kaduna have come into Jos to escape the prospect of living
under Islamic Sharia law, adding to the tension.
Under military rule in Nigeria communal divisions were suppressed,
but since the move to civilian rule in 1999 they have increasingly
come to the surface.
Communal violence has become the means by which the political
elites in the different regions attempt to build up a power base
for themselves and attempt to undercut a nationwide response among
Nigerias working people and poor masses to government-backed
IMF measures that have caused widespread impoverishment.
Nigeria contains a complex mixture of ethnic, linguistic and
religious groups. British colonialism fomented these divisions
to maintain its rule. In the northern area, the mainly Muslim
Hausa and Fulani peoples were the recruiting ground for the military
elite, a situation that continues to this day. Twelve of the northern
states have now defied the federal constitution and introduced
strict Islamic Sharia law. Punishments inflicted include the severing
of hands for theft, public whipping for adultery and stoning to
death for rape and murder. Protests from minority Christians resulted
in clashes in Kaduna state last year, leaving 2,000 dead.
In the mainly Christian south there has also been a growth
of tribalist groupings. The Oodua Peoples Congress, based
in Lagos and the south west, promotes the separation of the Yoruba
tribal grouping. It is said to have been responsible for the deaths
of about 1,000 people in ethnic violence against Muslim northerners.
There have also been a number of ethnic clashes in the highly
populated oil producing Delta region. In total, nearly 7,000 people
have died in communal conflicts since 1999.
In a country that is gripped by double-digit inflation, the
latest round of economic austerity measures will fuel more communal
tensions, as the 36 regional state governments compete for resources.
For its part, the central government is pressing ahead with an
IMF structural adjustment programme, forcing through privatisations
and further destroying the social conditions of the population.
A recent IMF report called on Nigeria to maintain the momentum
of its privatisation programme. It criticised the government for
giving way to pressure, particularly the massive protests
last year, when strikes took place over the level of the official
minimum wage. In response to pressure from workers, the government
was forced to substantially increase public service wages in May
2000. After widespread protests it also withdrew its decision
to remove the petroleum subsidy and deregulate the downstream
petroleum sectors.
The IMF condemned the sharp increase in government spending,
which rose to 43 percent of GDP in 2000, and the plans to further
increase it to 53 percent of GDP in the 2001 budget. The regime
in Abuja has been able to fund these increases in public spending
because of the rise in oil prices in 2000, but the IMF warned
that this would not be possible in subsequent years. It criticised
Nigerias plans to reduce poverty as too ambitious and called
for a sharp reduction in spending by state and local governments
and for vigorous efforts to reduce the wage bill.
The IMF and the World Bank are demanding the more rapid privatisation
of public enterprises, which account for 50 percent of total GDP,
57 percent of investment, and two-thirds of employment. They are
calling for the state-owned power industry to be sold off immediately
and for the government to give up any attempt to increase capacity,
despite the frequent power cuts that are plaguing the country.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |