|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
The Pennsylvania mine rescue and the human cost of coal
By Paul Sherman and Bill Vann
3 August 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The rescue last week of nine coal miners trapped underground
for 77 hours in a flooded mine shaft brought cheers of joy from
people not only in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, but throughout
the US. Millions had anxiously followed the successful race to
reach the miners.
This tireless effort to save human life struck a deep chord
nationwide. The display of solidarity and cooperation among the
rescuers, the trapped Quecreek miners and the Somerset communityin
a common social effort driven by human concerns rather than the
drive for private profitcontrasted sharply with the prevailing
news of the day, dominated by revelations of criminality and greed
within the US corporate elite.
Predictably, the media shaped the saga of the rescued miners
according to time-worn journalistic methods, massaging it into
a good news story, while working to turn the miners
themselves into momentary celebrities. For all the attention paid
by the major broadcast and print outlets, however, virtually no
one in the national media has bothered to seriously examine the
background of this accident and the dangers that miners like these
face every day they go underground.
To probe the conditions underlying this near fatal accident
would present a very different picture from that of the rescue
effort. As opposed to the mobilization of advanced technology
and engineering expertise seen in the effort to bring the nine
miners out alive, considerable sections of the mining industry,
including the Quecreek mine, seek to realize a profit by relying
on primitive methods and unsafe practices. The result has been
an increase in the number of coal mining deaths in the US for
three consecutive years, with the death toll reaching 42 in 2001.
The erosion of safety conditions and rise in mine fatalities
are the result of a relentless offensive against coal miners and
the working class as a whole over the course of more than two
decades.
Located some 60 miles east of Pittsburgh, with a population
of 80,000, Somerset County has undergone a social transformation
as a result of these attacks. Often described as a rural and farming
community, Somerset is, in fact, heavily working class, and its
history is bound up with the development of coal mining, which
has dominated the region for more than 100 years.
In 1979, one in every four workers in the county was a coal
miner. There were 84 mines employing 6,237 miners. Many others
worked in related industries that supplied or provided transportation
for the mines.
By 1984, the number of mines had fallen to 55 and the number
of coal miners to 1,945. By 1992 there were only 41 working mines
employing 1,001 miners, and by 1998 the total had declined to
just 803 miners working in 31 mines. A virtually identical decline
took place in the surrounding counties of Indiana, Cambria, and
Westmoreland, while in Pennsylvania as a whole, the number of
miners declined from over 60,000 in 1979 to less then 17,000 today.
The destruction of mining jobs was largely the result of conscious
decisions taken by the coal operators and the government in the
wake of the 1977-78 national miners strike, which saw unionized
miners humiliate the government of then-President Jimmy Carter
by defying a Taft-Hartley injunction. In response, there was a
concerted drive to shift coal production to non-union facilities,
first in the Western strip-mining areas and then in formerly unionized
mining districts.
The United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) responded to this
assault on jobs by seeking to prove to the coal operators that
the union could be a trusted partner in making the mining industry
competitive in the global market. In a series of contract concessions,
the union leadership agreed to cuts in wages, job losses and changes
in work rules that jeopardized miners safety.
In West Virginia and Kentucky, the drive to expand non-union
mining provoked a series of strikes during the 1980s and early
1990s in which the coal bosses, backed by the government, returned
to the use of scabs and violent attacks, including murder, against
the miners. The UMWA leadership isolated these struggles, and
most of them were defeated.
In Pennsylvania, the UMWA leadership did nothing to oppose
the destruction of jobs and signaled its willingness to collaborate
with the coal operators when it allowed Consolidated Coal, one
of the nations top ten mining companies, to open the non-union
Bailey mine in Green county in 1981. A second non-union mine,
Enlow Fork, opened in the same county in 1990.
The union gave its blessing to these operations by working
out a deal with Consol calling for laid-off union miners to be
given a certain percentage of job openings at the non-union facilities.
In addition, the UMWA was allowed to receive dues deductions from
these miners paychecks, even though they were no longer
covered by a union contract.
For those miners still working, real wages declined. According
to figures collected by the Pennsylvania Department of Labor,
Somerset miners earnings fell 15 percent between 1984 and
1992, while in neighboring Cambria County they plummeted by a
staggering 37 percent. By 1998, earnings had dropped another 8
percent in Somerset. Since earnings take into account overtime
and bonuses, hourly wages probably fell even further. The fall
in earnings reflected both the concessionary contracts of the
UMWA and the far greater proportion of workers employed in non-union
mines.
The destruction of jobs and the lowering of earnings affected
the whole community. In the 1980s unemployment soared, reaching
a high of 21.7 percent in Somerset County in 1983, with similar
figures in Cambria and Indiana. From 1980 to 1989, average household
income declined by 12.1 percent in Somerset, 14.1 percent in Indiana,
13.7 percent in Westmoreland, and 18.8 percent in Cambria. The
number of people living in poverty increased and the proportion
of young children living in poverty reached 20 percent.
During the stock-market-fueled boom of the 1990s, job growth
in the region was largely due to hiring by low-wage employers.
No longer do steel mills and mining companies top the list of
the largest employers in the area. Today the biggest employers
are retailers like Wal-Mart and Revco, and Seven Springs, a ski
and golf resort. Many of these jobs are low-wage, part-time, and
seasonal.
In those mines that continue to operate, the deterioration
of working conditions has proven even more dramatic than the fall
in wages or decline in jobs. With the closing of the larger, unionized
mines, a number of small non-union mines have sprung up, targeting
pockets of coal that the larger mines found unprofitable. These
mines, once dismissed contemptuously as dog holes
by union miners, are among the most dangerous.
Quecreek, the site of last weeks accident, is one such
mine. With a low capital budget, it can raise or lower production
as quickly as the market requires. Quecreek began mining operations
in 2001 with fewer than 20 workers. By the middle of the year,
it had grown to about 35 miners, who dug approximately 15,000
tons of coal a month. This year the workforce increased to 69
miners and was producing 50,000 tons a month until last weeks
accident.
To keep capital investment down, the company uses the older,
but still common practice of room and pillar mining,
in which large chambers of coal are removed, but pillars of coal
are left standing to hold up the roof.
While the wages of miners have fallen, the pay is still higher
than that offered by other employers in the community. At the
same time, miners are constantly under the threat of layoff if
a seam runs out or the price of coal falls.
This puts enormous pressure on miners to go along with whatever
the operators demand, so as not to lose their jobs. For younger
workers, scarce mining jobs may be the only chance to scratch
out a tolerable living for themselves and their families. For
the older workers, who have only known mining, the loss of the
job would be a catastrophe. Fear of being fired for not being
a team player intimidates many from raising safety
concerns.
It has now been confirmed that Quecreek did not conduct either
of the two standard procedures that would have detected the underground
water that flooded the shafts and trapped the nine miners. Either
a two-dimensional seismographic study of the area or the practice
of drilling probing holds would have safely alerted the miners
that they were working only four feet from the flooded abandoned
mine. Nor did the Pennsylvania department for mine safety require
either procedure in approving the companys request to operate
so close to abandoned mines.
Meanwhile, the Bush administration is working closely with
the mine operators to gut what little protection current safety
regulations provide. It has proposed an additional six percent
cut in the budget of the Mine Safety and Health Administration,
most of it to come from the agencys coal enforcement division.
It has also issued a policy change that reduces the number of
times coal operators must test for dust levels inside a mine.
The effect will be to allow operators to flout rules on dust contamination,
resulting in more accidents and more miners stricken with black
lung disease.
To ensure the subordination of safety concerns to corporate
interests, the Bush administration is continuing to pack mine
safety agencies with industry hacks. Most recently it nominated
Stan Suboleski, an executive from Massey Energy, which has one
of the worst records for mine injuries and deaths, to serve on
the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Committee. Last year,
David Lauriski, former general manager of the Utah-based Energy
West Mining Co., was tapped to head the federal Mine Safety and
Health Administration, where he has promoted policies favoring
the mine operators.
Most of the rescued Quecreek miners have said they will not
go back underground. They are well aware that the flooding of
their mine was not a freak accident, but indicative of how dangerous
mining has become as a result of the drive by the employers and
the government to boost profits.
See Also:
Nine US miners rescued after
three-day ordeal
[29 July 2002]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |