|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
Anti-globalisation demonstrations in Copenhagen
By our reporters
24 December 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
On Saturday, December 14, one day after the end of the latest
European Union summit in Copenhagen, a number of demonstrations
took place in the Danish capital.
Under the slogan Our world is not for salePeople
before profit, several thousand demonstrators from all over
Europe assembled in Copenhagen. The demonstrators were predominantly
young and came mainly from Sweden, Norway, Germany as well as
Denmark.
The international demonstrations had been called by an alliance
calling itself Another Europe is possible! and the
protests were directed above all against the threat of a US-led
war against Iraq. Other themes taken up by demonstrators were
the attacks being mounted against the welfare state throughout
Europe as well as the process of growing militarism in the European
Union and the repressive policies of the EU with regard to immigrants
and refugees.
The demonstrations last Saturday were part of a range of activities
which included an alternative European summit organised by nongovernmental
agencies united in the NGO Forum, which took place December 13-15.
The alternative summit included numerous lectures, discussions
and further demonstrations.
It is not easy to discern any political basis for the alternative
summit because the organisers had issued no joint document nor
made any attempt to formulate one. Many of the appeals and handouts
distributed were limited to very general formulations, such as
the demand for an open, collective and democratic Europe
in a humane world economic order (leaflet issued by the
Young DemocratsYoung Left).
A statement by the Attac anti-globalisation movement in Denmark
began with the words: Encouraged and pleased by the renewed
momentum of the European Social Forum in Florence, where 60,000
took part in discussion over ways of developing resistance to
war and neo-liberalism the protests in Copenhagen are principally
directed against the economic and social consequences of EU plans
for eastward expansion. Especially in the sphere of agriculture
it is necessary to anticipate substantial social problems.
The statement continued: Our request is more democracy and
social development in opposition to the attempts to develop
Europe as an economic and military superpower.
At the same time, there were distinctly nationalist tones to
be heard in the course of the alternative summit. For example,
the Indian agricultural scientist and author, Vandana Shiva, was
enthusiastically received at a conference devoted to the theme
of privatisation, multinational concerns, social welfare
and democracy. She explained that privatisation was principally
driven by the greed of multinational companies who seek to use
their monopoly position to maximise profits.
She emphasised that the starting point for resistance to privatisation
must be local. As example she cited the struggle against environmental
pollution which, she declared, could only be overcome on a local
basis. This was the only way in which a global solution could
be possibly implemented. She claimed such a strategy would enable
defenders of the environment to find an ally in local governments
whose own powers are also being undermined by the process of globalisation.
Tomasz Terlecki from the Polish-based institution Bankwatch,
an organisation for the supervision of the activities of international
finance organisations in eastern Europe, went a step further.
He began his lecture by recollecting the time when a state of
war was announced by the Polish government in 1981, and then made
a parallel to today when the communists governing
Poland were attempting to bring Poland into the EUa process
which he and many other groups rejected.
The biggest problem for the European Union, he maintained,
was the fact that governments were not doing enough to resolve
environmental problems.
All of the groups involved in the NGO forum had called for
non-violent protests and cooperation with the police, but individual
anarchist groups organised their own demonstration on Saturday
to protest against the attacks being made on democratic rights
and the EU police-state. For its part the NGO forum
organised a demonstration with the slogan Peoples
Meeting.
In the run-up to the EU summit in Copenhagen, European governments
had attempted to criminalise the planned protests, utilizing repressive
measures to prevent them from taken place.
A few days before the summit the Schengen Accord, which guarantees
freedom of movement in the European Union, was suspended. Such
suspensions have become routine in the recent period as European
governments seek to prevent multi-national demonstrations aimed
against their policies.
One week prior to the conference the governments of Gerhard
Schröder (German Social Democratic Party -SPD), and
the right-wing liberal Anders Fogh Rasmussen (Venstre) in Denmark
tightened up border controls. According to press reports, 60 percent
of the entire Danish police force was involved at one time or
another in security measures in connection with the summit.
A series of arrests were made, including those of six persons
attempting to travel to Copenhagen who were apprehended by German
police at the border crossing point of Puttgarden. The arrests
were justified by police on the basis that the group had already
come to the attention of the authorities for their unruly
behaviour at other demonstrations. Their presence in Copenhagen
therefore represented a considerable danger to the interests of
the German Republic, they claimed. In the meantime it has become
clear, however, that none of the six apprehended has any criminal
prosecution record. An additional six-strong delegation of Italian
protesters was arrested by Danish police.
Anarchist and autonome (anarchist) groups reported that their
computer providers had been searched and web sites closed down
or sabotaged. Emails had been intercepted and newspapers confiscated
in addition to journalists being either arrested or prevented
from carrying out their work.
Response to the WSWS
Reporters for the World Socialist Web Site distributed
several thousand leaflets in Copenhagen, set up a large bookstall,
sold literature and discussed a socialist alternative to war and
the destruction of the welfare state with many demonstrators and
participants at the counter-summit. Many demonstrators were already
familiar with the work of the WSWS web site and were pleased to
speak to our reporters.
One demonstrator was Håkan Håkansson, a joiner
who currently lives in Sweden, but who has also lived and worked
in Denmark. When asked why he had attended the international demonstrations
in Copenhagen, he replied: I want to protest against war
and militarism, in particular against the sabre-rattling on the
part of the US against Iraq and the violent Israeli policies in
Palestine; also against international exploitation and the attacks
being made on the welfare state.
When asked what he saw as the cause of this development, he
replied: The money, power and control of rich countries.
I am on the side of the poor. I am only a joiner, I do not have
millions in my bank account. The poor must stick together. If
Israel is being suppressed by the Palestinians then I would be
on the side of Israel, but this is simply not the case.
WSWS: What do you think can be done about the developments
you are protesting?
Håkan Håkansson: Protest, protest and then
more protest. We must demonstrate collective solidarity and unite.
It is also important to read. Everyone should read about the roots
and background of developments and distribute books about it.
We should do everything we can to put a stop to those madmen in
power who are intent on destroying the world. I think it is a
never-ending task. Thats how I see it, anyway.
WSWS: What do you think about the political developments
in Denmark, where a right-wing coalition won the last elections?
Håkan Håkansson: I have mostly lived in Sweden,
but I believe things were relatively good for the Danes, in other
words, there was a developed welfare state similar to that of
Sweden. Now everything is being taken away from institutions,
local authorities and the poorpiece by piece. The measures
are not carried out in a fanatical fashion, but systematically.
In that respect the new right-wing government is not so different
from previous social democratic governments.
WSWS: You mean that the cuts and attacks had already begun
under the social democrats?
Håkan Håkansson: Yes, since the end of the
1980s. They started the cuts and thereby laid the basis for the
right wing to become ever-more stronger.
The WSWS also spoke with Tobias Pflüger, the speaker of
the Information Office against Militarism (IMI) based in Tübingen,
Germany. Pflüger was one of the speakers at the counter-summit.
When asked about a realistic strategy against the danger of a
war with Iraq, he answered: We need the strongest possible
movement against war, which is both very broad but also based
on clarity. I am encouraged about the possibilities for such a
movement on a European level.
He went on to say that in his opinion one could not expect
any resistance from European governments, including the German
administration: The German government was in favour of such
a war from the beginning and only introduced its abstinence on
the issue of war for a few months to ensure an electoral victory.
It was clear, however, from the very beginning that they would
participate, although stopping short of dropping bombs. We have
to continually seek to build a broad grassroots anti-war movement
which can also function in terms of content. Pflüger
said he regularly reads the WSWS.
See Also:
EU summit in Copenhagen: Eastward expansion
intensifies social antagonisms in European Union
[13 December 2002]
Europe: Thousands protest plans for US-led
war against Iraq
[6 December 2002]
Prague NATO summit: internal tensions
near the breaking point
[4 December 2002]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |