|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: The
Philippines
US prepares further military exercises in the Philippines
By John Roberts
27 December 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
When 1,300 US troops started arriving on Basilan Island in
the southern Philippines in February, both Washington and Manila
were at pains to declare that their presence was part of a limited
training operation designed to enhance the capability of Filipino
forces to defeat Abu Sayyafa group of armed Islamic separatists.
It was obvious at the time that this was a transparent ruse
aimed at sidestepping local political opposition and a constitutional
prohibition preventing foreign troops operating on Philippines
territory. The Bush administrations immediate aim was to
free two American hostagesa missionary couple, Martin and
Grace Burnhamin order to register a victory in its war
on terrorism.
The hostage rescue mission resulted in a shambles. Martin Burnham
was killed along with a Filipino hostage. But the longer-term
strategic aim behind the deployment of forces remained unaffected.
This was what the US media referred to as the second front of
the global war on terror, in effect the reestablishment
of a de facto permanent US military presence in the Philippines.
The last of the US troops were supposed to leave the Philippines
on July 31. Instead, almost a year after the first units arrived,
more than 200 US troops are still in southern Mindanao working
on civic action and support projects. Under the pretext
of helping the impoverished local population, the engineers have
been upgrading roads, ports and other infrastructure to provide
better access for the military.
Now US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has ordered the US
Pacific Command and Joint Chiefs of Staff to plan a further training
exercise for next year, modeled on the Basilan operation. Under
the plan being discussed in Manila and Washington, 150 to 175
US Special Forces troops would join the 275 soldiers and marines
still in the Philippines. Once again the exercise
would take place in an area of active operationson Jolo
in southern Mindanao where the army has been hunting the Abu Sayyafand
US soldiers would be allowed to fire in self-defence
when accompanying Filipino soldiers.
The latest plan, reported in the New York Times in early
December, differs from one announced in mid-November to train
two light rapid reaction companies and four light infantry battalions.
According to the New York Times, the revised exercise will
shift hundreds of troops scheduled for classroom or routine
training in the northern Philippines to a combat zone in the south.
Unlike the earlier Basilan operation, the new exercise will not
be limited to six months but, according to a US official ,
will range over much of next year.
There are indications, however, that the US and the Philippines
are already considering more far reaching military collaboration.
On December 3, Associated Press reported that Washington has drawn
up a proposal for the US military to play a key role in
organising, training and arming a new Philippines strike
force to deal with crises in the Philippines as well as being
available for UN operations and any regional and international
military response to crisis.
While a Filipino general claimed that the strike force was
still in a conceptualisation stage, it suggests, at
the very least, that the Pentagon has ambitious proposals for
working with the Philippine armed forces, inside and outside the
country. According to Associated Press, the creation of the new
military unit is linked not only to a deepening US involvement
in fighting Muslim separatists in the south but also Marxist
insurgents elsewhere in the country. In August, Washington announced
that the Communist Party of the Philippines and its New Peoples
Army had been placed on the US list of terrorist organisations.
Last month President Arroyo ignored opposition protests and
signed the long-mooted Military Logistics and Support Agreement
(MLSA) that allows the US to use Philippines facilities as a supply
centre for its military operations in the region. The two sides
circumvented Philippines law and the parliament by declaring the
MLSA to be a purely administrative agreement which did not require
legislative approval or scrutiny.
Both Filipino and US officials have bent over backwards to
downplay the significance of the MLSA. US Ambassador Frank Ricciardone
referred to it as a fairly boring... low level agreement.
Foreign Secretary Blas Ople labeled the MLSA as nothing
but administrative and accounting procedures. However, the
arrangement is far from routine.
The MLSA allows the US to store ammunition, food, water and
fuel and provides US forces with access to support services such
as billeting, communications and medical services. The agreement
calls for reciprocal logistic support between the
militaries of the two countries for approved activity,
including combined exercises and training, operations and
other deployments. When asked, Philippine military spokesmen
refused to elaborate on the meaning of other deployments.
Taken as a whole, the Bush administration has, in the space
of just 12 months, substantially bolstered the position of the
US military in the Philippines. For the last decade, following
the closure of the huge Clark Airfield and Subic Bay naval bases
in 1992, the US only had a limited military involvement. Now it
has established a de facto permanent military presence, with a
provision to rapidly expand the Philippines into a major supply
base.
The Bush administrations global war on terrorism
has provided a convenient pretext to advance long-held US ambitions
to bolster its position in the Philippines and throughout South
East Asia where the US has substantial strategic and economic
interests. The Philippines is strategically located to form part
of the US militarys logistics for operations in Central
Asia and the Middle East, particularly as Washington prepares
for the invasion of Iraq. Moreover, the country could provide
a convenient base of operations if the US decides to increase
pressure on China, which Bush has branded as a strategic competitor.
In the face of significant opposition in the Philippines to
the return of the US military, Washington has had to proceed cautiously.
But the Bush administration has found a willing ally in President
Arroyo, who wants a close relationship with Washington to secure
US economic assistance and to bolster her standing domestically
and in the region. The war against terrorism has also
provided Arroyo with a convenient excuse to enact a battery of
anti-democratic measures against the growing resistance to the
impact of her governments program of privatisation and economic
restructuring.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |