|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Bush administration moves to suppress documents on vaccines
By Joanne Laurier
10 December 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The Bush administration asked a federal claims court on November
26 to seal documents relating to hundreds of cases of autism allegedly
caused by a mercury-based preservative, thimerosal, used in childhood
vaccines.
The governments legal action comes on the heels of an
insertion into the Homeland Security bill that protects Eli Lilly,
the drug company giant that developed thimerosal, from lawsuits
involving the additive. The bill removes all liability from the
pharmaceutical industry and health officials for the injuries
and death resulting from the preservative.
The connections between the Bush administration and the pharmaceutical
company are extensive. Eli Lillys chairman and CEO, Sidney
Taurel, was recently given a seat on the presidents Advisory
Council on Homeland Security and Mitch Daniels, former president
of Lillys North American operations, is currently the White
House budget director. Former president George Bush sat on Eli
Lillys board of directors.
In asking for the documents to be sealed November 26, Department
of Justice (DOJ) lawyers asked a special master in the US Court
of Federal Claims for a protective order on behalf of Tommy G.
Thompson, the secretary of Health and Human Services, whose department
administers a government fund to compensate people injured by
vaccines. DOJ lawyers claim that the law creating the fund gives
the secretary jurisdiction over which information is released
and they argue that automatic disclosure of the documents would
take away that right. The claims are being heard by Special Master
George Hastings in a vaccine courtpart of the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVIC)that
was created in 1986, when the government fund was established.
The vaccine court was set up to speed compensation claims and
help protect vaccine makers from having to pay large punitive
awards decided by juries in state civil courts. Claims must be
filed within three years of a childs first symptoms (autism,
however, is typically not diagnosed until 18 months after the
first symptoms appear) and the program grants a maximum of $250,000
for proof of injurya sum considerably lower than the typical
award for autism in a state court. It also takes four to five
years to reach a decision under NVIC, according to Portland lawyer
Mike Williams, who represents hundreds of families in suits against
the pharmaceutical companies.
The court is currently hearing approximately 1,100 claims brought
by the families of autistic children, who claim that thimerosal
has caused autism and other neurological disorders in children.
The request by the Bush administration would prevent plaintiffs
who later go to civil court from using evidence gathered during
the required vaccine court proceedings.
There is no secret here. What the petitioners are arguing
for are enhanced rights in a subsequent civil action, complained
Justice Department attorney Vincent Matanoski to Reuters Health.
The order, which amounts to punishing of the families of injured
children, will require that plaintiffs incur the time and expense
of regenerating evidence in a civil suit.
The vaccine program is a public health programevery
child has to get inoculated, Sallie Bernard of the parental
advocacy group Safe Minds told the WSWS. Therefore the public
has the right to know every aspect of the program.
Mercury-based thimerosal was added to vaccines to safeguard
against production-related contamination. The Federal Drug Administration
began urging vaccine makers to eliminate the substance in mid-1999,
as did the Public Health Service and the American Academy of Pediatrics.
The World Health Organization still defends thimerosal, which
is currently being manufactured in vaccines sent to the underdeveloped
countries. Thimerosal helps vaccines survive dirty storage conditions
and allows for cheaper packaging in multi-dose bottles, as opposed
to single-dose vials.
In 1999 the Institute of Medicine, an associated organization
of the National Academy of Sciences, concluded that the evidence
was inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship
between thimerosal exposures from childhood vaccines and the neurodevelopmental
disorders of autism and other problems, but added, However,
data on mercury toxicity more generally suggests that the hypothesis
is biologically plausible.
In the midst of the heated response by advocacy groups and
law firms involved with the thimerosal controversy to the DOJs
attempt to seal documents, a study was published November 30 in
the British medical journal The Lancet. Its findings claimed
that infants who received vaccines containing thimerosal had levels
of mercury in their blood that were within the federal safety
limits. The study examined 33 infants from two to six months who
were injected with thimerosal-laced vaccines and 15 infants that
were administered mercury-free vaccines.
Sallie Bernard of Safe Minds commented on the report: Thirty-three
blood draws cannot do justice to a known neurotoxin. One major
shortcoming of a small sample size is the low chance of including
infants who are especially sensitive to mercurys effects,
or who may have detoxification difficulties. The blood was not
drawn at peak levels, and the samples were not randomly drawn,
but were convenience samples and therefore not representative
of all infants in terms of health status, socioeconomic status,
ethnicity and other potentially important factors. Also the amount
of the dosage used in the study was considerably less that the
typical dosage administered throughout the 1990s.
This study is an example of the fact that as yet there
has not been enough time or resources allocated to complete much-needed,
genuine investigations, stated Bernard, who expressed alarm
at the prominence The Lancet had given to the finding.
She further questioned the objectivity of the studys
author, Dr. Michael E. Pichichero of the University of Rochester,
who has extensive ties to the vaccine manufacturers. In a disclosure
statement for an article in the American Academy of Family Physicians
newsletter of April 2000, Pichichero admits to receiving research
grants and/or honoraria from Abbot Laboratories, Bristol-Myers
Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck, Pfizer Labs, Roche, among a host of
others. Pichicheros work has been cited in 21 vaccine patent
applications. Bernard pointed out that the University of Rochester
web site describes Dr. Pichichero as an immunologist, not a toxicologist.
Thimerosal came under scrutiny due to the dramatic rise in
autism throughout the 1990s. Early on in the decade several new
thimerosal-based vaccines were added to the standard childhood
schedule, leading to an augmentation of two to three times the
doses of multiple vaccines. According to the Federal Drug Administrations
(FDA) web site, prior to the recent initiatives by the agency
to reduce or eliminate thimerosal from vaccines, the maximum cumulative
exposure to mercury via routine childhood vaccinations during
the first six months of life was 187.5 micrograms. The FDA states
that an exposure to more than 62.5 micrograms within the
first three months of life significantly increases a childs
risk of developing autism. An FDA review conducted in 1998
revealed that children who had received the full complement of
childhood vaccines were potentially exposed to mercury levels
30 to 50 times the acceptable levels established by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA).
The number of children who have been affected by autism leaped
from 1 in 2,000 in 1970 to 1 in 250 in 2000. (The National Vaccine
Information Center reports clusters in areas of New Jersey and
California of 1 in 150). Concurrently, the number of children
diagnosed with learning disabilities has now reached 1 in 5.
Another Safe Minds advocate, Lyn Redwood, a nurse practitioner
whose husband is a physician, told the WSWS the story of her son
Will. He was normal until his second year of life. He then
began to regresshe lost speech, eye contact and became withdrawn
and despondent. When Will was diagnosed with autism she
began investigating her sons quantity of mercury exposure
and discovered it was 125 times the allowed level. It is her belief
that Will suffered from delayed neurotoxicity which led to the
onset of autism.
In the early 1990s, two new vaccines were added to the
vaccine protocol for the first six months of life. I believe that
caused what we see now as an epidemic of autism in children. You
can see that most clearly in California, the state with the best
tracking records, said Ms. Redwood. California recorded
an increase of 273 percent between 1987 and 1998 in the number
of children entering the California development services system
with a professional diagnosis of autism, according to the California
Department of Developmental Services.
She continued: The Homeland Security Bill has now moved
all cases to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act, which
has a three year limitation. My case was in the batch of 1,000
cases, but the statute of limitation has closed the door on us
and also the majority of parents who remain unaware of the statute.
The Houston-based law firm of Waters & Kraus filed the
first known lawsuit alleging thimerosals connection to autism.
The firm is leading a consortium of 10 firms nationwide that are
actively prosecuting cases of this nature.
The lead attorney for the consortium, Andy Waters, obtained
through Safe Minds an unreleased confidential report by scientists
of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) which states: As
for the exposure evaluated at 3 months of age, we found increasing
risks of neurological developmental disorders with
the increasing cumulative exposure to thimerosal ... within the
group of developmental disorders ... for the subgroup
called specific delays, and within this subgroup for
the specific disorder developmental speech disorder,
and for autism stuttering and attention
deficit disorder.
Mr. Waters told the WSWS: It defies coincidence between
double the vaccines and the dramatic upsurge in autism. But this
should come as no surprise, given that the government and its
allies are in control of public policy. Eli Lilly gave more money
to the Republican campaign than any other pharmaceutical company
in an industry that gave $20-40 million. The DOJ and the administration
are owned by the pharmaceutical companies. They want to seal the
files to prevent proving the case against these companies. [Attorney
General John] Ashcroft is owned by the industry and the Democrats
are waffling all over the place, so the administrations
move comes as no real surprise.
With the cases sealed, Eli Lilly will move for a dismissal
and all my cases are filed against Eli Lilly, Waters continued.
This will be a long battle against people who have all the
resources and motivation. They control the pier-reviewed medical
and scientific journals and all the research money. It will be
a long and difficult fight.
Waters added that no amount of money can give these children
back the potential that they were born with, and no amount of
money will comfort the parents that watched helplessly as their
children literally just slipped away.
See Also:
Bushs double standard:
protecting corporations, victimizing workers
[18 November 2002]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |