|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Conference of US right-wingers hears call to execute John
Walker
Let liberals know they can be killed too, says
TV commentator
By Patrick Martin
27 February 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The largest US gathering of right-wing political activists
cheered the remarks of Ann Coulter, a columnist and television
commentator, who called for the execution of John Walker Lindh
as a political measure to intimidate liberals.
When contemplating college liberals, you really regret
once again that John Walker is not getting the death penalty,
Coulter said in an address to the Conservative Political Action
Conference (CPAC). We need to execute people like John Walker
in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize
that they can be killed too. Otherwise they will turn out to be
outright traitors.
Coulter was unapologetic afterwards, claiming that her statement
was a huge hit with the audience. About 3,500 people
attended the four-day CPAC conference, the annual gathering of
far-right elements in the Republican Party, which was held January
30-February 2 in Arlington, Virginia. Representatives and supporters
of some 70 organizations and publications participated. (It was
at the 1994 CPAC conference that the Paula Jones sexual harassment
case was publicly launched against the Clinton White House, at
a press conference organized by a group of right-wing activists.)
Coulters comments, and the audience reaction, are an
expression of one of the most important realities in American
political lifethe emergence within the political establishment
of a significant fascist layer, cultivated and promoted by sections
of corporate America and the media, which now plays a dominant
role in the Republican Party and wields enormous influence within
the Bush administration.
Coulter is one of the most ignorant representatives of this
layer, which espouses a toxic combination of Christian fundamentalism,
American chauvinism and militarism. A former Justice Department
and Senate aide, she became a syndicated right-wing columnist
and television pundit during the Clinton administration.
Her focus was on scandal-mongering rather than policy, as she
worked closely with the group of right-wing lawyers who used the
Paula Jones case to engineer Clintons impeachment. Coulter
herself wrote an anti-Clinton screed, High Crimes and Misdemeanors,
which raised her profile in ultra-right circles. In her book she
compared Clinton to a serial killer.
In the wake of the September 11 terror attacks, Coulter declared
in her column in National Review Online, referring to Muslims,
We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and
convert them to Christianity. This evoked considerable press
commentary and protest, and National Review refused to
run a follow-up column in which she advocated taking special police
measures against swarthy males.
Ultimately the right-wing magazine dismissed her as a contributing
editor, not because her political views are uncommon in those
circles, but because her racist diatribes cut across the Bush
administrations efforts to win support from Pakistan and
various Middle East client states for the US war in Afghanistan.
With President Bush declaring that the United States was not at
war with Islam, it was embarrassing to have a fervent supporter
of the Bush administration declaring that war with Islam was precisely
what was required.
Since then Coulter has continued to assert that the war
on terrorism requires the Christianizing of the Middle East.
In a television appearance in December she declared that future
terrorist attacks against the West can never be fully eradicated
until the American ideal of freedom and equality of all people
is adopted in these countries. And that freedom ultimately derives
from a Christian world view.
Such rantings were no barrier to Coulters invitation
as a featured speaker at CPAC. A press release for the event described
her as one of a group of great authors who have
made themselves available to our conference attendees.
Nor did her presence give any pause to the numerous Bush administration
officials who attended and spoke, including National Security
Adviser Condoleeza Rice and Secretary of Health and Human Services
Tommy Thompson.
There has been little press attention to the matter in the
three weeks since the end of the CPAC meeting, although one can
imagine the furor that would have erupted if a prominent liberal
had hailed the execution of Timothy McVeigh as an object lesson
for conservatives. No Democratic Party spokesman has denounced
Coulters comments or demanded that the Bush administration
distance itself from her identification of liberalism and treason.
Nor has any Bush administration or Republican Party spokesman
raised any objection to her remarks.
On the contrary, similar comments have been made both by administration
spokesmen and by other representatives of the far-right political
milieu. Attorney General John Ashcroft, in testimony before Congress,
declared that anyone criticizing the sweeping anti-democratic
provisions of the USA Patriot Act was guilty of aiding terrorism.
Pat Robertson, founder of the Christian Coalition, only last
week declared on his television program, the 700 Club, that Islam
was violent and aggressive. Islam is not a peaceful religion
that wants to coexist, Robertson said. They want to
coexist until they can control, dominate and then, if need be,
destroy.
Coulters comments about John Walker Lindh underscore
the political motives behind the prosecution of the California
youth who converted to Islam and went to Afghanistan to fight
for the Taliban. It hearkens back to the methods of the McCarthy
witch-hunts and the trial and execution of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.
The two Communist Party members were sent to the electric chair
in order to terrorize all left-wing opposition to American capitalism.
It is not the cowardly and corrupted representatives of official
liberalism, in the Democratic Party leadership and the media,
who are the principal targets of this right-wing venom. What Coulter,
Ashcroft and company fear is that, given the growing disparities
of wealth and income in America and the unpopularity of the Bush
administrations social policies and attacks on democratic
rights, wide layers of working people will be attracted to a critique
of American capitalism based on socialist and democratic principles.
See Also:
The Bush administration and
John Walker Lindh: who are the real conspirators?
[25 January 2002]
US anthrax attackers aimed
to assassinate Democratic leaders
Media silent on military links
[23 January 2002]
Ashcroft defends Bushs
war against the Constitution
Tells Senate hearing that critics aid terrorists
[12 December 2001]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |