|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: France
New French prime minister outlines anti-working class program
By Alex Lefebvre
11 July 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
In his first major policy statement July 3, French Prime Minister
Jean-Pierre Raffarin outlined the program of austerity measures
and repression that his administration intends to implement. The
right-wing regime, with a majority in the National Assembly and
backed by President Jacques Chirac, is preparing a massive reduction
in social spending, an expansion of the military and an increase
in the power of the state.
Using vague and bombastic language, Raffarin called for a new
humanism, which would rest on four pillars:
the attentive state, the shared Republic,
a creative France, and humanized globalization.
The new government is not simply relying on such phrases. It
is making preparations for an all-out confrontation with the working
class. Raffarin has asked the heads of public servicesabove
all, in public transportation, whose workers were particularly
combative during the strike movement of 1995to prepare mechanisms
to ensure the continuity of services in the case of strikes.
Raffarins four pillars need to be decoded.
Making the French state more attentive means strengthening
the role of the police and the military. Lamenting the dispersion
of the state, Raffarin declared his intention to restore
Republican authority by creating 13,500 new jobs in the
police forces and making the administration of justice more serene,
by increasing its personnel by 10,100. He also proposes to reform
the 1945 ordinance that bans the imprisonment of minors, to make
young delinquents face their responsibilities. Raffarin
promised as well to increase the military budget so as to modernize
its equipment and improve the conditions of the military.
The shared Republic is a code phrase for cutting
spending and shrinking the role of the state in the economy. Raffarin
suggested eliminating 900,000 public sector workers jobs
between 2001 and 2016 through attritionthus cutting 40 percent
of a workforce of roughly 2.3 million. He wants to avoid an
overly quick increase in costs of health insurance by limiting
the state regulation and creating the necessary flexibility
to assure the performance of hospitals (presumably
a reference to the increase in health workers salaries,
which the conservative newspaper Le Figaro considers exorbitant).
He declared that health care would be financed according to the
principles of clear roles and everyone assuming
their responsibilities. The average person will presumably
pay more for health care.
Raffarin also proposed a dramatic reshaping of the pension
system by June 2003. While the financial press complains bitterly
of the number of workers who do not work beyond the ages of 50
or 55, Raffarin wants those who wish to prolong their working
life beyond [the age of 60 to be able] to do so, simultaneously
announcingwith a straight facethat the right to retire
at the age of 60 ... will not be jeopardized. Similarly,
while he recommends greater equality between Frenchmen,
he states that everyone must have the opportunity to complete
his pensionwhich will inevitably favor more prosperous
social layers.
Raffarin, whose political origins are in regional administration,
made decentralization a centerpiece of his speech. Presented as
a way of making government closer to citizens by transferring
decision-making power to regional governments, its principal aim
is a constitutional reform authoriz[ing] local experimentation
which would, according to President Chirac, allow smaller areas
to serve as guinea pigs for full-scale reforms.
Creative France is a code phrase for massive reduction
in taxation and decreasing employers outlays, supposedly
to stimulate the creation of small businesses and, hence, jobs.
Raffarin thus proposed to decrease payroll taxes, to reduce income
taxes by 5 percent, and to maintain his policy of not giving the
minimum wage (SMIC) the traditional raise given by each incoming
administration. It is clear, however, that these proposals do
not principally aim to create jobs, but simply to lighten employers
fiscal burdens. Raffarin wants increased flexibility
in the law setting the workweek at 35 hours, so as to not frustrate
the desires of certain employees to work longer hoursand
if workers work longer hours, companies will obviously need fewer
of them.
Raffarin did not openly suggest the privatization of the national
electricity and natural gas companies (Electricité de France
[EDF] and Gaz de France [GDF]). However, he spoke of two
large companies with international reputations in the energy
sector whose juridical form will be modified to allow for
a progressive opening-up of their capital, i.e., which will
be privatized. Le Figaro immediately identified the companies
Raffarin had in mind.
To drive home his vision of unbridled capitalism, Raffarin
added that generally, the state does best to refrain from
competing with private enterprise, except when strategic interests
are at stake.
Humanized globalization occupied only a few minutes
of the 90-minute speech. Raffarin proclaimed the importance of
Franco-German relations inside Europe (relations sorely strained
by the proposed reform of the Common Agricultural Policy supported
by Germany, which Raffarin explicitly opposed elsewhere in his
speech), the importance of creating a European identity
(without explaining what a united Europe would do) and the necessity
to intervene in any discussion of globalizations human
dimension, an object which he did not define.
French political circles confront the working
class
To understand Raffarins approach, and his nervousness,
one must recall the last time a right-wing French government tried
to impose drastic cuts in social spending. In November-December
1995 the so-called Juppé Plan (named for then Prime Minister
Alain Juppé) provoked a near general strike in the public
sector. Millions of workers walked out and demonstrated against
the government.
The right-wing regime, despite an overwhelming parliamentary
majority, proved to be isolated and generally despised. Several
weeks into the strike, pollsters found that more than 60 percent
of the population still supported the strikers. The CGT and FO,
the Stalinists of the French Communist Party (PCF) and the far
left radicals managed to prevent the mass movement from
bringing down the government, but the strikes left the regime
badly shaken. Juppé, now the head of the Union for a Presidential
Majority (UMPthe current ruling party), remains extremely
unpopular to this day.
François Hollande, interim leader of the Socialist Party
(PS), responded to Raffarins speech by warning the new government
of the potential consequences of its actions. Noting the decreased
protection for low-wage workers, he asserted, You
will need a lot of dexterity to ... convince the country to give
up its social gains. The PS leadership agrees on the need
for austerity and reform of the pension scheme and
other social programs. They are concerned, however, that a frontal
assault will provoke another mass eruption.
An article in Figaro Magazine (a weekly supplement to
the newspaper) put the question bluntly in an article entitled
Is France still governable? The article explained
that the government must convince public opinion: An impossible
challenge? The one on which Alain Juppé stumbled in 1995?
Not necessarily. Its author claimed that public opinion
is not the street (a few thousand demonstrators, two or
three tractors) ... or the unions.
This provocative language, as well as the announcement that
the new government was openly making strike-breaking preparations,
provides a glimpse of the real state of class relations in France.
The official left responded to the plans for strike-breaking
with a few miserable phrases. Jean-Christophe Cambadélis
of the PS called them a posthumous revenge for 1995, a way
to punish the public sector workers who took to the streets against
Juppé. Cambadélis went on to suggest changing
the PS from a party of elected representatives into
a party of combat, which he nevertheless wants to
see led by hardened apologists for capitalism such as Hollande,
Laurent Fabius and Jack Lang.
In the meantime, a social confrontation is brewing. The vague
and confusing language of Raffarins speech did not calm
the electorates doubtsthe approval ratings of Chirac
and Raffarin fell by 3 percent and 2 percent to 47 percent and
56 percent respectively during the first week of July. Wide layers
of the population are mistrustful of a majority party and an administration
stained by corruption scandals.
The government and big business are incurring increasing hostility
from wide layers of the population. The casualization of labor
is continuing, with 75 percent of French companies using temporary
workers in 2002, compared to 56 percent in 1999, and 62 percent
of firms calculating working hours on a yearly basis compared
to 22 percent in 1999. Undocumented immigrants have begun to occupy
churches to escape police, fearing the offensive against them
proclaimed by Raffarin in his speech. The refusal to increase
the minimum wage angered low-wage and minimum-wage workers (smicards),
like the bakery cashier who, when interviewed by Le Parisien,
said: Its nauseating, all these politicians who promise
us a better life, when its exactly the opposite thats
going on.
See Also:
France: The war over the minimum wage
never took place
[4 July 2002]
Record abstention in second
round of election
French right-wing parties consolidate large parliamentary majority
[18 June 2002]
Right wing wins solid majority
in French legislative election
Record abstention reflects popular disaffection
[11 June 2002]
French President Chirac appoints
new government with right-wing agenda
[17 May 2002]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |