|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Australian court sentences Iranian seaman on "people
smuggling" charges
By Margaret Rees
5 June 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
Further examples of the brutal treatment meted out to asylum
seekers by Australian authorities were revealed in a magistrates
court case last week in Melbourne. The hearing involved Hossein
Iran, a 44-year-old seaman from the Iran Mazandaran, who
was charged with breaches of section 233 of the Migration Actthe
laws used to prosecute those involved in the black-market transportation
of refugees and asylum seekers.
Irans crime, according to Australian immigration authorities,
was that he assisted three of his countrymen to stowaway to Australia
two years ago. The three menhis cousin Bahram Peyrou and
two brothers, Nasser and Nader Sayadi-Estahbanatiwere wanted
by Iranian security forces. In a humanitarian act that put his
own life at risk, Iran helped the men board the ship and hid them
in his cabin until it reached Australia.
Australian immigration officials intercepted the stowaways
after they jumped ship at Portland in southwestern Victoria on
September 11, 2000. Fearing that Iranian authorities would persecute
him when the ship returned to its home port, Iran decided soon
after arriving to give himself up to Australian officials. While
all four men applied for refugee status, they were treated as
criminals and incarcerated in detention centres, including Iran,
who was charged with people smuggling.
Last week Magistrate Noreen Toohey found Hossein Iran guilty
as charged and imposed a four-month suspended jail sentence. She
ruled that Irans actions constituted a serious breach of
the Migration Act, and stated that a notion of general deterrence
was an element in the punishment.
While Hossein will appeal the jail sentence, he was immediately
returned to the Maribyrnong Detention Centre to await the outcome
of his asylum application appeal to the Refugee Review Tribunal.
He has already spent 22 months in detention, some of it in solitary
confinement. None of this was taken into account by the magistrate
when handing down the sentence.
Taped interviews with the defendant by Department of Immigration
and Multicultural Affairs (DIMA) officials were played as evidence,
revealing the contemptuous attitude of government officials toward
asylum seekers claims. Janet Creaner, the DIMA official
investigating Irans case, blankly refused the seamans
repeated request for a lawyer in Portland and told him to look
for one in the phone book. Her tone became increasingly provocative
and she sarcastically denigrated his claim to have saved his friends
lives. What did you do, put a bandage round their legs?
she scoffed.
Three senior DIMA officials attended the court proceedings
to check on the progress of the prosecution case, indicating its
importance as a legal precedent and as part of the increasingly
intimidatory atmosphere being fomented by the Howard government.
Remarks by prosecuting counsel Berge Tchikirian demonstrated
the lengths to which the government is prepared to go to stop
asylum seekers entering Australia. Tchikirian suggested that even
if Amnesty International organised a shipload of refugees from
a war-torn country and brought it to Australia, this would be
considered a criminal action under section 233.
According to Tchikirian, it made no difference whether or not
Hossein Iran was aware of Australian law, He knew,
the prosecutor said, they didnt have visas to enter
Australia or any other country for that matter. He argued
that once the defendant became aware (mid Indian Ocean) that the
ships destination was Australia, he should have given up
the stowaways to the ships captain. After all, the
captain is a Pakistani national, not an Iranian, he joked.
Magistrate Toohey accepted a statement from Hossein Iran made
under duress on the Iran Mazandaran in Portland and in
front of the ships captain and chief officer. This was despite
the fact that Iran pleaded several times with Australian officials
to be taken ashore because he was in fear of his life. Following
interrogation, the ships radio officer typed up a statement
for Hossein to sign.
Australian attorney Steven Harper, acting for the Islamic Republic
of Iran shipping line, was present during the Portland interview
and produced a copy of the seamans statement in court. The
original has been forwarded to the ship ownersthe Iranian
government. When asked at the magistrates court why an independent
interpreter was not provided during the ship interrogation, Harper
claimed that the defendant spoke good English, even though the
seaman has virtually no understanding of legal language.
Defence barrister Lex Lasry QC unsuccessfully attempted to
prevent this document being used in the trial because in it, the
seaman claimed that the three stowaways left Iran simply for improved
economic prospects. When he was taken ashore, Hossein Iran crossed
out those sections of the statement before he would sign it. Lasry
explained the circumstance in which the statement was being made
and said the defendant was attempting to protect the stowaways
families, still in Iran, from reprisals.
These dangers were highlighted by the testimony of two of the
stowaways, Bahram Peyrou and Nader Sayadi-Estahbanati, who explained
they were wanted by Iranian security forces because of their role
in a protest of 40,000 workers in the oil city of Abadan in July
2000.
Peyrou, a former construction worker still awaiting the results
of his refugee application and currently detained at Maribyrnong,
told the court he saw a friends teenage son killed when
the government militia opened fire on the Abadan demonstration.
Twenty people died and hundreds were wounded.
As a political organiser for the Fedaian of Iran (Majority),
Peyrou knew he was a marked man and escaped the city, later to
meet up with the Sayadi-Estahbanati brothers. When the three fugitives
accidentally met Hossein Iran at Bandar Abbas, they persuaded
him to help them escape.
Nader Sayadi-Estahbanati, a motor mechanic, broke down, weeping
uncontrollably in the witness stand. His application for asylum
in Australia was recently rejected and he has tried to kill himself
twice in the past few months, plunging his fist into a live television
set and then slashing his wrists. He has been heavily sedated
to try to prevent him making further suicide attempts.
After the hearing was temporarily adjourned, he recovered his
composure and continued giving evidence. Under questioning by
Lasry, he told the court, I wanted nothing more than to
stay in Iran with my wife and child, but they wanted me to leave
and save my life. I saved my life, but I lost my spirit.
Sayadi-Estahbanati said that two of his brothers were involved
in organising the Abadan protest and that security forces had
raided his home in an attempt to arrest him.
Last year Naders brother Nasser Sayadi-Estahbanati, deeply
depressed by over 12 months in detention, decided to discontinue
his refugee status application and accept deportation to Iran.
While Iranian authorities claim he simply disappeared, his family
believes that security forces seized him at Tehran airport on
his return and that he has been murdered.
This is now likely to be the fate of Nader who, immediately
after giving testimony, was flown by DIMA officials to Perth,
3,000 km away, to coincide with the arrival of the Iran Mazandaran,
on one of its trips to Australia. On May 29, a struggling Nasser
was forcibly placed on the ship to be deported back to Iran.
Lawyers in both Melbourne and Perth attempted unsuccessfully
to obtain injunctions to prevent Sayadi-Estahbanatis deportation.
Lasry also sought an application in the Victorian Supreme Court
before Justice Beach to have Nader Sayadi-Estahbanati brought
ashore from the ship as a key witness in Hossein Irans appeal
against his four-month jail sentence. Beach refused to grant an
injunction and merely indicated that Lasry should ask federal
Attorney General Daryl Williams to intervene.
When the legal bids failed, representatives from the International
Transport Workers Union boarded the ship as it docked briefly
at the port of Esperance in Western Australia to load grain on
June 1. But the ships captain, after ringing the Iranian
embassy in Canberra, refused transport union officials access
to Sayadi-Estahbanati.
The deportation is designed to intimidate the 333 Iranians
currently being held in Australian detention centres. The Iranian
government, which has executed hundreds of political opponents,
insists that they must sign voluntary deportation agreements.
Despite the fact that Sayadi-Estahbanati refused to sign, the
Howard government has claimed the right to deport him by placing
him in the same ship on which he entered the country.
A spokesman for Immigration Minister Phillip Ruddock told the
media that Sayadi-Estahbanati had given evidence in the original
court case and did not need to do so again. The law says
the man must be removed, and he is being removed. There is no
reason why he should be kept in Australia, the official
said.
A spokesman for the Australian Council of Trade Unions later
told Agence France Presse that the captain handed a letter
to immigration officials in Esperance stating that Sayadi-Estahbanati
was on a hunger strike and was so weak that he was only expected
to live four to six days. Amnesty International and other human
rights organisations have said that if Sayadi-Estahbanati is returned
to Iran the authorities will execute him.
See Also:
Australian government cuts deal with
Kabul to repatriate Afghan asylum seekers
[3 June 2002]
Australian government defends
its brutal treatment of refugees
[9 May 2002]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |