|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Korea
US-backed groups push North Korean asylum bids in China
By James Conachy
24 June 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
In the past three months, at least 10 groups of North Koreans
have been secreted through northern China to make high-profile
bids for political asylum at embassies and diplomatic missions
in Beijing and Shenyang. The largest group was in March, when
25 North Koreans rushed into the Spanish embassy. This month 26
people have made it into South Korean or Canadian facilities and
were allowed to leave China on Sunday. The most recent incident
was on June 13. A teenager successfully entered the South Korean
consulate, while his father was seized by Chinese security guards.
The background to these asylum attempts lies in the repression
and worsening humanitarian catastrophe gripping North Korea. As
many as 300,000 people are believed to have fled across the border
into northern China since 1995. North Korea has been in the throes
of food and energy shortages for more than a decadesince
it lost the markets and subsidies provided during the Cold War
by the Soviet Union. Despite evidence that natural disasters and
a lack of fuel and fertilizer had utterly devastated the Norths
agricultural production, the major powers delayed the provision
of food and other aid until the Pyongyang regime agreed to a series
of political concessions. While estimates vary, as many as two
million people may have died from starvation in the 1990s before
large-scale UN relief operations went into effect.
Conditions in North Korea have been steadily relapsing back
toward a state of famine in the 18 months since the Bush administration
was installed in Washington. From 1998 to 2001, under the so-called
sunshine policy, South and North Korea took steps,
tentatively backed by the Clinton White House and Japan, to end
the Cold War military stand-off on the Korean peninsula and open
up the North for investment and transport links. Bushs inauguration
was followed by the withdrawal of US and Japanese support for
the proposed deal with the North. Military tensions steadily built
up last year, climaxing this January when Bush condemned North
Korea as part of the axis of evil and accused its
government of starving its people.
The accusation of starving the North Korean people
can be most accurately leveled against the American and Japanese
governments. The hardline US and Japanese stance against Pyongyang
has disrupted the international relief operations that were underway.
This year the US is providing just half the amount of grain it
provided in 2001. Japan, which donated 600,000 tons of food in
2000, provided nothing at all last year and has given nothing
again this year.
Following the lead of the major powers, other countries have
dramatically scaled back aid for the North. An appeal by the UN
World Food Program (WFP) for $250 million in donations had raised
just $25 million by April. Last year, the WFP was providing nutrition
to as many as six million of North Koreas 23 million people.
This year, it has been forced to issue warnings that it might
run out of relief by the end of July.
While the White House has not openly called for a regime-change
in North Korea, as it has in Iraq, that is clearly the objective
of its policy. It is seeking to aggravate the social crisis in
the North to the point where the regime either disintegrates or
is forced into a settlement that enhances US dominance in East
Asia. In particular, the Bush administration is determined to
prevent any settlement on the peninsula that could lead to demands
for the withdrawal of its military presence in the region and
thereby weaken its ability to maintain pressure on China, which
it has declared to be a strategic competitor.
Within this context, it is worth examining what is behind the
string of asylum bids by North Koreans in China. They have not
been the acts of isolated individuals, but are being organised
and financed by a network of American and South Korean Christian
fundamentalist groups. These groups have close connections to
the rightwing of the Republican party and conservative US associations,
who, in turn, have close links to those in the upper echelons
of the Bush administration, the Pentagon and the CIA pushing for
a tougher stance against both Pyongyang and Beijing.
The most publicised Christian fundamentalist group involved
in the asylum bids is Exodus 21, which is based in Los Angeles
and South Korea. A number of rightwing Christian web sites in
the US openly and actively discuss support and fundraising for
North Korean refugees.
The head of Exodus 21, Korean-American pastor Douglas Shin,
recently told the Washington Post: I just want the
dictatorships of China and North Korea to let my people go, just
like Moses told the Pharaoh. Shin advocates stopping aid
to North Korea in order to hasten its collapse and absorption
by South Korea. As an example of his thinking, he speculated in
an interview in May 2001 about a unified, pro-US Korea undertaking
a physical expansion and taking over Chinas
north-eastern Manchurian provinces.
The legwork of smuggling North Koreans through China appears
to being done by South Korean Christians, with the American organisations
mainly providing money. Both the North Korean refugees and the
South Korean activists attempt to blend in with the two million
ethnic Korean Chinese living in the regions of China that border
the Korean peninsula. In May this year, the Korea Times
published a report stating that as many as 100 South Korean Christian
missionaries had been arrested inside China while
attempting to organise asylum bids.
The main international spokesman for the asylum bids since
they began in March has been Norbert Vollertsen, a German doctor
and Christian fundamentalist who worked in North Korea from mid-1999
to December 2000 on behalf of the aid agency Doctors Without Borders.
Calls for an East German-style collapse
Vollertsen told journalists following the incident at the Spanish
embassy in March that the aim of getting the refugees out of North
Korea was to duplicate the events in East Germany during 1989.
He declared: We will create a flood of refugees to embassies
and it will lead to the collapse of North Korea. This is the way
it happened in 1989. First there were a few dozen defectors, then
hundreds and then thousands. After several mass asylum bids,
Czechoslovakia and Hungary opened their borders and allowed tens
of thousands of East Germans to go to West Germany.
The fundamentalist groups are also pursuing other avenues for
moving North Koreans out of China to South Korea. On June 12,
four North Koreans applied for asylum in the South Korean port
of Incheon after successfully stowing-away aboard a Chinese ferry
from the port of Dalian. There are rumours that a far larger incident
is being prepared to coincide with the media focus on the region
due to the current World Cup Soccer finals in South Korea and
Japan. Vollertsen boasted to the Japanese Sankei Shimbun
on May 22 that he was raising the funds for an asylum bid by over
1,000 North Koreans, who intended to sail from China in small
boats to Incheon.
According to Vollertsen, he is motivated only by concern for
the Korean people. He claims that during his time in North Korea
he saw evidence that much of the starvation was being directly
caused by the Pyongyang regime in order to punish discontent and
keep control over the population. Within months of leaving North
Korea, however, he had appeared in Washington as the guest of
rightwing associations such as the Defense Forum Foundation (DFF)
and the National Endowment for Democracy. The DFF board includes
former defense and foreign policy officials of the Reagan administration
and ex-military officers.
In March and May 2001, Vollertsen testified before the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee. His unsubstantiated allegations assisted
in providing a justification for the Bush administrations
curtailment of relations with Pyongyang. He has made four other
trips to the US since, during which he has been feted by Republican
congressmen such as Ed Royce from California and Chris Smith from
New Jersey, who are principal advocates of the Bush White Houses
hardline stance against both North Korea and China.
In August last year, Royce moved a resolution in the US Congress
demanding Beijing stop categorising North Koreans as economic
migrants, allow the mass entry of North Koreans into China and
allow international agencies to establish refugee camps on the
China-North Korea border. As well as Smith, among the eight congressmen
who co-sponsored the resolution was Dana Rohrabacher, one of the
most prominent congressional members of the Blue Teama
network that views US conflict with China as inevitable as Beijing
develops greater economic and political clout.
Alleged concern for the plight of North Korean refugees also
figures prominently in the documents of the so-called US
Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, which was formed
last October and is nothing more than a front for the Republican
rightwing and an ideologue for Bushs policies. It is made
up of figures like Reagan aide Fred Ikle, former Democat congressman
Stephen Solarz; former Reagan administration assistant national
security advisor Richard Allen; Carl Gershman of the National
Endowment for Democracy; and Suzanne Scholte of the DFF.
While failing to detail these US political connections, the
New York Times and other major American newspapers have
now published a number of stories demonising North Korea over
the refugee issue. Reminiscent of the wildly exaggerated stories
circulating about Serb atrocities on Albanians before the NATO
attack in 1999, the New York Times published a series of
gruesome allegations on June 10 that the Pyongyang regime is carrying
out the systematic murder of babies in its prisons. North Korea
has denounced the charge as a whopping lie.
Within a climate of anti-North Korea hype, the Republican rightwing
reintroduced another resolution on June 11 demanding China open
its borders to North Korean refugees and international refugee
agencies. Supported by the Democrats and passed 406 for, and none
against, the resolution calls for Bush to make the human rights
of refugees a US demand on North Korea.
The issue is also directed against China, which has been an
ally of North Korea. Beijing is already displaying alarm at the
fact North Korean refugees have been used to justify the first
demands since the 1949 Revolution to allow an international bodythe
UN High Commission for Refugeesto operate inside its borders.
Reports indicate it has initiated large-scale police sweeps to
round up and deport North Koreans.
A picture emerges which, at the very least, suggests the asylum
bids may be intended to assist the Bush administration justify
the next stage of increasing pressure on the Pyongyang regime,
and indirectly also on Beijing. A US special envoymost likely
Jack Pritchardis scheduled to travel to North Korea this
week for the Bush administrations first official talks with
the regime. Alongside threats over Pyongyangs alleged possession
of weapons of mass destruction, the refugee question
is likely to be raised.
See Also:
Asylum incident fuels anti-China
rhetoric in Japan
[27 May 2002]
War danger grows on Korean
peninsula
[27 March 2002]
Bush visit to Japan cements
closer ties against China
[1 March 2002]
Bush's "evil axis"
speech destabilises the Korean peninsula
[15 February 2002]
US steps up pressure
on North Korea
[30 November 2001]
The Nobel Peace Prize
and Korea's Kim Dae-jung
[3 November 2000]
The Korean summit:
no recipe for peace and prosperity
[27 July 2000]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |