|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Dozens of companies bid to run Philadelphia public schools
By Tom Bishop
1 March 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The decision by the state of Pennsylvania to take over Philadelphias
public schools last December has been followed by a frenzy of
competitive bidding by private firms seeking to cash in on the
reorganization of the nations sixth largest school district.
Dozens of companies have applied to serve as consultants and provide
services, while dozens more have applied to run as many as 100
of the lowest performing of the citys 264 schools.
What began as the state takeover of the school district is
quickly leading to its wholesale privatization. The bids to participate
in this privatization are in response to a request for qualifications
put out by the so-called School Reform Commission (SRC), which
was appointed in January to implement the takeover announced by
Republican Governor Mark Schweiker and the citys Democratic
mayor, John Street, on December 21.
Thirty-one companies met the SRCs January 26 deadline,
commencing the bidding war. There can be little doubt that the
companies selected will provide a bare minimum at a maximum profit
for a range of services, including consultant contracts to provide
staff training; technology; school environment improvements, involving
safety and discipline; food service; and procurement.
On February 15, the SRC announced the list had been narrowed
to 20 companies, including five educational management companies,
local universities, several financial and consulting firms, and
a non-profit educational organization. As has been true throughout
the takeover process, the criteria for selection have not been
disclosed. Commission spokeswoman Carey Dearnley would only say
that companies will be selected because of their fit with
the commissions agenda and the financial benefit to the
district.
In addition, 22, as yet unidentified, companies have applied
to manage the 100 failed schools, in partnership with
community groups beginning in the 2002-2003 school
year. So far, six groups have been named as potential partners
with these companies. The leadership of these groups includes
two Democratic state legislators, one former Democratic legislator
who was hired last month by the SRC as a legal consultant, a civil
rights advocate, a minister, a former education company executive,
a record producer and other businessmen.
Meanwhile the School Reform Commission announced on February
20 that it would postpone any action on new charter schools until
November. The decision was announced with no discussion or explanation,
but was likely driven by financial considerations. The opening
of 39 charter schools since 1997, with the enthusiastic support
of former Governor Tom Ridge and most state legislators, has cost
the district $100 million per year, including half of the $200
million deficit in this years $1.6 billion budget.
Last year, private-school students enrolled in charters cost
the district $25.5 million while the district received $1.6 million
from the state in compensation. The previous school board had
pleaded unsuccessfully with state officials about this draining
of funds from public schools. Now that many of the public schools
are to be privatized under the control of the most cut-rate outfits,
even independent charter schools seem a luxury the state and profit-seeking
companies cannot afford.
Pennsylvania Governor Mark Schweiker continues to promote Edison,
Inc., the largest education management company in the US, as the
only private company with which the SRC should contract. Edison
started the takeover process last fall when it conducted a $2.7
million study for former Governor Ridge, which recommended privatization
of the districts central administration and 60 of its schools.
Edison CEO Chris Whittle said recently the company has between
30 and 40 staffers preparing to take over Philadelphia schools,
and expects to spend $2 million by June 30 in preparation. Edison
wants the contract for all 22 management services in the school
district, such as teacher and principal recruitment and reorganization
of the districts central office. It also wants to take over
management of at least 45 of the schools. It has the inside track
despite Edisons weak financial prospects and continuing
reports of poor academic performance in its schools.
On February 13, a report by Bloomberg News charged that Edison
had boosted its revenues by $96 million a year, a quarter of its
stated earnings, by counting as revenue money it had never received.
The report detailed how in several instances Edison counted as
revenue money that school districts actually paid as teachers
salaries. Adam Field, Edisons chief financial officer, in
a response that would do an Enron accountant proud, commented
that since teachers are eligible for stock options from Edison
and are overseen and controlled by Edison they are considered
joint employees of Edison and their district. Field
said the company was following generally accepted accounting procedures.
Recently, contracts with Edison have been cancelled in Wichita,
Kansas; York, Pennsylvania; Trenton, New Jersey; San Francisco
and in the state of Georgia. Gerald Bracey, a longtime critic
of school privatization, in a recent report prepared for the Education
Policy Research Unit of Arizona State University, contends that
Edisons research methods are suspect. While they paint
a glowing picture of themselves in their annual reports,
Bracey said, all of the studies that have looked at the
achievement of Edison schools objectively find that Edison schools
dont do any better than regular public schools and often
do worse.
What the takeover and impending privatization will mean for
schools was shown in one of the first policy decisions by the
SRC. Seizing upon problems evident in the already decaying school
system, a state legislative committee held seven public hearings
in Philadelphia in December where they conducted more than 250
interviews with students, parents and teachers concerning the
issue of school violence. The hearings were held after the November
13 beating of a student at George Washington High School by five
other students. He suffered a fractured skull and required brain
surgery.
In its report, the committee stated that among Philadelphias
210,000 students there were 3,119-recorded incidents of violence,
weapons possession, and disruption requiring police intervention
in the 1999-2000 school year. There were 924 assaults on students
and 1,124 on staff reported that year; more than 400 firearms
and 336 knives were confiscated. The social climate in the schools
has deteriorated in the last decade due to increasing poverty
among its primarily working class students. These problems have
been exacerbated by welfare reform, which has led
to children spending many hours unsupervised by an adult, and
an education crisis brought on by a combination of years of under-funding
and an inordinate emphasis on standardized test score results.
In response to the committee report, on February 13 the SCR
announced the first of several proposed task forces, which the
reform committee says will be expected to act in rapid-response
fashion in the next few weeks to implement the recommendations
of the state committee report. The report recommended streamlining
the process by which a student can be expelled from the public
schools. It also recommended increasing the length of the limit
on suspensions from five to ten days. The task force will meet
with federal officials to seek support in changing federal laws
that impede discipline, especially in the cases of special-education
students. The task force will also recommend expanding GED programs
in juvenile jails and doubling the size of an alternative school
for troublemaking students from the current 1,200.
The report also recommends keeping students in disciplinary
schools longer, rather than returning them to their neighborhood
school. The job training and qualifications of school police officers
will be increased, requiring them to have two years of law-enforcement
experience and a degree in criminal justice. It also recommended
the removal of employees in the districts disciplinary office
who are not willing to take a zero-tolerance stance
on student discipline.
The SRC has given no indication that it plans to address the
issues of oversized classrooms and lack of counseling and social
service support that have led to the deterioration of education
in the citys public schools.
See Also:
Members named to commission
to manage Philadelphia schools takeover
[24 January 2002]
US Education
Issues
[WSWS Full Coverage]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |