|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
Huge losses for Haiders Freedom Party in Austrian elections
An analysis of the vote
By Ulrich Rippert
27 November 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The huge loss of votes by the Austrian Freedom Party (FP),
led by right-wing populist Jörg Haider, was applauded in
European capitals Monday. Haider finished ( Financial
Times) and petty bourgeois tames the arsonist
( Süddeutsche Zeitung) were typical headlines, as
it became clear that Haiders FP had lost two-thirds of its
vote in last Sundays prematurely called Austrian general
elections. From a level of 26.9 percent three years ago, the FP
plunged to 10.1 percent Sunday.
Haiders immediate response was to offer his resignation
as minister president of the Austrian state of Kärnten and
declare his intention of retiring completely from politics. In
Klagenfurt, the capital of Kärnten, he told the press, I
have had enough of politics. Just a few hours later, however,
he declared he had changed his mind and would remain in office.
The main party to profit from the heavy losses of the FP was
the conservative Austrian Peoples Party (ÖVP) led by the
current Austrian chancellor, Wolfgang Schüssel. The ÖVP
received 42.3 percent of the vote, an increase of 15.3 percent.
This is the biggest increase in votes by a party in post-war Austria
and was the greatest election victory for the ÖVP in 36 years.
For the first time since 1966 the ÖVP received a larger
percentage of the vote than the social democrats and now has the
biggest representation in the Austrian parliament.
Contrary to forecasts of polls prior to the vote, which indicated
a neck to neck race, the Austrian Social Democratic Party (SPÖ)
was only able to make a minimal improvement in its votejust
3.8 percentand with a total of 36.9 percent trailed clearly
behind the Peoples Party. The Austrian Green Party also expected
to do better. It won barely 9 percent, an increase of 1.6 percent.
The Liberal Forum (LIF) also lost votes, dropping 2.7 percent,
and received less than 1 percent of the vote. Electoral participation
was 80.5 percent, slightly higher than in the last elections three
years ago.
An examination of electoral voting patterns makes clear that
the major shift took place amongst supporters of the governing
parties. From a total of 765,000 former FP voters, 602,000 switched
their vote to the FP partner in government, the Peoples Party.
Only 11 percent of former FP voters switched to the SPÖ.
This figure is significant because in the elections three years
ago many workers voted for Haider in protest at the anti-welfare
policies of the SPÖ. Haider subsequently used this support
to pretentiously and somewhat prematurely proclaim himself the
new workers leader in Austria.
Now many of the former SPÖ supporters have voted for Wolfgang
Schüssel rather than return to the camp of social democracy.
Two conclusions can be drawn from this. Firstly, that Haiders
rise and surprising electoral gains three years ago, which enabled
the FP to overtake the ÖVP and become Austrias second
biggest party, was principally based on a protest vote rather
than reflecting of a deep-seated right-wing sentiment amongst
voters. Secondly, it makes clear that the social democrats are
incapable of regaining their former voters because they have nothing
to offer which could be regarded as an alternative to the right-wing
and conservative policies of the ÖVP.
The decline of the FP was particularly pronounced in the industrial
areas of large cities. Three years ago the FP became the strongest
party in the Austrian capital of Vienna, with Haider referring
to Vienna as a bastion for freedom. In this latest
election the FP lost ground not only to the SPÖ (44.4 percent,
gaining 6.5 percent) and the Peoples Party (30.1 percent, gaining
13.1), but also the Greens (14.8 percent, gaining 4.5 percent).
In workers districts of Vienna the SPÖ was able to win
above-average results, while in more middle class areas the Green
Party benefited. In the student district of Vienna Neubau the
Greens received the largest percentage of all parties. The situation
was similar in other big cities. Three years ago the FP was the
strongest party in five capital cities of Austrian states. It
has now lost this dominating position. Even in Klagenfurt the
party lost 17.5 percent, winning a total of 21.7 percent. In countryside
electoral districts votes lost by the FP were almost invariably
switched to the Peoples Party, while in the cities the social
democrats gained above-average results. According to an analysis
of the election by the Austrian paper Standard, the
bigger the city, the larger the wins for the SPÖ.
The SPÖ refrained from undertaking any sort of mobilisation
of the working class in the election. Instead, it offered its
services as partner to Austrian business organisations as a force
more able to implement unpopular budget cuts and measures aimed
against the Austrian welfare state than the right-wing conservative
coalition of Wolfgang Schüssel.
In his aggressive election campaign Chancellor Schüssel
also took advantage of the dramatic plunge in popularity of the
Germany coalition government, which was re-elected for a further
term in office in September. The ÖVP put up posters featuring
the picture of German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder and warning
of chaos should a government similar to the SPD-Green Party coalition
be elected in Austria. The poor showing of the SPÖ is also
therefore a consequence of the complete lack of orientation, combined
with readiness to attack social gains, which has characterised
the German government for the past two months.
Media commentaries and election experts have been quick to
locate the main component for the dramatic loss in votes of the
FP in the destructive role and the drive towards
self-destruction of Jörg Haider, who sabotaged the
work of the government, including his own party. Such estimations
are too superficial, however. The decline of the FP has deeper
roots.
Since Haider acquired control of the Freedom Party in the mid-1980s
and masterminded its right-wing populist course, the party has
been beset by a fundamental contradiction. Based on social demagogy,
the party attempts to win the support of protest voters by promising
benefits for disillusioned and despairing social layers. At the
same time, in its economic and social policies, the party defends
the interests of business organisationsa neo-liberal programme
combining tax cuts for the rich with budget cuts at the expense
of less privileged layers.
Participation in government by the Freedom Party three years
ago intensified this conflict. Haider himself refrained from taking
up a post in government and instead openly criticised the policies
of the government and his own party from his base in Kärnten.
This inevitably led to fierce internal party conflicts finally
leading to the partys plunge at the polls.
The most important role of the Freedom Party in the past few
years has been to clearly force the political agenda to the right.
This is also the reason why Chancellor Schüssel is keen to
continue governing in a coalition with the FP despite the latters
election losses.
The conclusion to be drawn by the working class is the urgent
necessity of building its own party to combat unemployment and
the destruction of the welfare state on the basis of an international
and socialist programme. Otherwise the danger remains that the
developing social crisis and growing desperation will create conditions
for a revival of support for Haider or other right-wing demagogues.
See Also:
On eve of national elections
Austrias Social Democrats, Greens shift to the right
[23 November 2002]
Haider brings down the Austrian
government
[21 September 2002]
Austria: power struggle within
Haiders Freedom Party
[2 September 2002]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |