|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Behind the Democrats election debacle: growing alienation
among US working class voters
By Patrick Martin
12 November 2002
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
In the aftermath of the defeat suffered by the Democratic Party
in the November 5 mid-term election, party officials and officeholders,
as well as sections of the media, have begun to comment on the
causes of the partys failure to hold the Senate or gain
seats in the House of Representatives.
Much of this analysis is an evasion or a form of apologetics,
since it attributes the Democratic debacle to the purported political
influence and popularity of George W. Bush in his role as a wartime
president. The commentators fail to ask the obvious question:
who and what has made it possible for a president who lost the
popular vote and was undemocratically installed in office, and
who is widely derided as ignorant and inarticulate, to exercise
such supposed power?
As the WSWS pointed out in its initial analysis of the vote
(US midterm election: the meaning
of the Democratic debacle), the outcome of the election
owes far more to the collapse of the Democratic Party and its
inability to mount any serious opposition to the Bush administration
than to any intrinsic strength of the Republicans or popular support
for their extreme-right policies.
A detailed examination of the November 5 vote requires careful
study of the turnout and voting patterns, which has been hampered
by the shutdown of the Voter News Service (VNS), the consortium
of news organizations that has conducted extensive exit polling
of voters for several decades. On the eve of the election, the
VNS announced that for unexplained technical reasons, it would
be unable to provide early projections of the outcome of the various
races, and would not provide analyses or breakdowns of voting
patterns. But some significant information has begun to surface
in press accounts of voter turnout in a number of cities and states.
Voter turnout overall was estimated at 39.3 percent of eligible
voters, slightly above the all-time low of 37.5 percent in the
last mid-term election in 1998. But in most of the country, the
turnout among working class and minority voterswho traditionally
tend to vote heavily for the Democratswas down significantly
from 1998. Turnout among those layers most closely aligned with
the Republicansupper-middle-class and Christian fundamentalist
votersrose substantially.
Turnout rose in a handful of states with highly competitive
racesMissouri, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Floridawhile
plunging in many others, including New York and California.
The growing estrangement of black working class voters from
the Democratic Party is a national phenomenon, but it was particularly
noticeable in the South, where the Republicans swept gubernatorial
races in South Carolina, Georgia and Florida, and led by a few
thousand votes, pending a recount, in Alabama. Democrats won the
governorships of three of these states in 1998, and would have
carried Florida in the 2000 presidential campaign but for the
intervention of the US Supreme Court.
The consequence of the Democrats capitulation to Bushs
2000 election coup was a sharp decline in voter turnout as compared
to 1998 and 2000 in the Democratic strongholds of Palm Beach and
Broward counties in southern Florida, the focus of much of the
recount battle two years ago. Turnout in Palm Beach fell from
52.7 percent in 1998 to 45.8 percent this year, while turnout
in Broward fell from 45.6 percent to 34.5 percent, in contrast
to an increase in the statewide turnout from 49.6 percent four
years ago to 53.6 percent in last Tuesdays vote.
The statewide black turnout, according to newspaper exit polling,
was 43 percent on November 5, compared to the record 72 percent
in 2000.
A referendum vote conducted alongside the gubernatorial race
in Florida provided a clear indication that the 2002 midterm election
did not represent a swing to the right on the part of the public.
Florida voters approved a ballot proposition establishing tight
legal limits on class sizes in the public schools and mandating
the state government to fund the schools to the level required
to hire the necessary teachers. The measure passed by 52-48 percent,
although Republican Governor Jeb Bush and most of the state business
establishment vehemently opposed it. Bush even promised, in a
private comment inadvertently captured on tape, to use devious
methods to evade carrying out the class size plan if it passed.
According to many accounts of the Florida campaign, Democratic
gubernatorial candidate Bob McBride, who supported the class size
referendum, had been closing the gap with Bush until a debate
in which he was directly askedby NBCs Tim Russert,
the moderatorhow he would pay the cost of hiring the additional
teachers. McBride ducked the question, making it clear that his
support for better schools was purely rhetorical and that he,
like Bush, was unwilling to find the necessary funding for public
education. From that point on, McBrides poll numbers began
to sink.
In neighboring Georgia, the Republicans had their biggest election
victory, defeating an incumbent senator and governor and taking
two congressional seats that had been redrawn by the Democratic
state legislature to favor their party. The Republican candidates
amassed huge vote totals in largely white outer suburbs of Atlanta
and in the rural south of the state, more than offsetting the
Democratic margins in the states largest city.
Governor Roy Barnes saw his vote drop by 15,000 from 1998,
although he actually increased his margin of victory in Atlanta
itself. In smaller rural counties with large black populations
his vote plunged. The victor in the race, former Democratic state
senator Sonny Perdue, became the first Republican governor of
Georgia since the Reconstruction period that followed the American
Civil War of 1861-65. He benefited from an increase of 250,000
in the Republican vote, mainly in suburban counties like Gwinnett
(whose total vote rose by 22,000), Cherokee (up 10,000) and Forsyth
(up 12,000).
In the Carolinas, the Republicans defended two open Senate
seats while defeating an incumbent Democratic governor, Jim Hodges,
in South Carolina. One voter registration group estimated black
voter turnout fell about 11 percent from 1998, while there was
an increase in the fundamentalist Christian right vote in suburbs
and rural areas. In North Carolina, Republican Senate candidate
Elizabeth Dole carried several urban counties with large minority
populations, such as Guilford County (Greensboro).
In Texas the Democratic Party sought to base its electoral
hopes on a coalition of racial minorities, nominating a Hispanic
candidate for governor and a black candidate for US Senate, but
both ran on conservative programs, avowing their support for the
war and tax policies of George W. Bush, and therefore giving no
reason to vote for them other than skin color and ethnicity. Both
candidates lost badly, with one analysis of voting returns finding
that 52 percent of ballots cast were straight-ticket Republican.
Perhaps the most dismal failures for the Democrats came in
the Middle Atlantic and New England states which presidential
candidate Al Gore swept in 2000. Republican candidates won governorships
in Maryland, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island
and Vermont, as well as taking the governorship and an open Senate
seat in New Hampshire, the only state in the region that Gore
did not win. Democrats won governorships only in Pennsylvania
and Maine, but in the latter state the Republicans held onto a
Senate seat.
Particularly striking were the defeats in Massachusetts and
Maryland, two states with the highest party registration advantage
for the Democrats. Maryland Lieutenant Governor Kathleen Townsend,
daughter of Robert F. Kennedy, lost to Republican Congressman
Robert Ehrlich, as turnout fell in the black and working class
districts of Baltimore and the inner Washington suburbs, while
rising in the outer suburbs of both metropolitan areas.
The Democratic defeats in New England reflected a sharp decline
in support among white working class voters, since most of these
states have only small minority populations. Shannon OBrien,
the Democratic candidate for governor of Massachusetts, carried
only 59 percent of the vote from union households, despite the
all-out endorsement of the trade union bureaucracy. Millionaire
venture capitalist Mitt Romney carried the high-tech Route 128
belt around Boston by a large margin, offsetting OBriens
narrower than expected lead in Boston and older industrial cities
like Quincy and Lowell.
There were reports of increased voter turnout in several Midwestern
and plains states where close contests ultimately decided control
of the Senate: Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota, South Dakota and Colorado.
In Missouri, Democrat Jean Carnahan received 81,000 more votes
than the winning Senate candidate four years ago, but her Republican
opponent, James Talent, polled 104,000 more votes than the 1998
winner.
In Minnesota, where former Vice President Walter Mondale was
a stand-in candidate after the death of Democratic Senator Paul
Wellstone, a last-minute political provocation apparently tipped
the balance. Wellstone had opened up a lead in the polls after
his well-publicized vote against a resolution giving Bush authority
to wage war on Iraq. But Republican Norm Coleman defeated Mondale
by over 50,000 votes.
More than 20,000 people, many of them young, turned out for
a memorial service for Wellstone the week before the election
at the University of Minnesota. They booed Governor Jesse Ventura,
an independent, and Senate Republican leader Trent Lott, and cheered
calls from Wellstones family and friends for a Democratic
victory at the polls to honor the senators memory.
The governor stormed out of the ceremony in a display of outrage,
and the media portrayed the memorial gathering as a partisan lynch
mob. Ventura reversed his previously announced intention to appoint
a Democrat to fill Wellstones seat, naming Independence
Party chairman Dean Barkley instead, and tacitly threw his support
to Coleman. Two-thirds of self-identified independent voters backed
the Republican, according to one subsequent poll, giving Coleman
his margin of victory.
The only exception to the nationwide pattern of narrow Democratic
losses in key races came in South Dakota, where incumbent Senator
Tim Johnson defeated Republican John Thune by 528 votes. His entire
margin of victory came from a record turnout among Oglala Lakota
Indian voters on the Pine Ridge reservation, where turnout jumped
from below 30 percent to nearly 50 percent, following an aggressive
voter registration campaign, and 90 percent of the votes went
to Johnson.
Colorado was another case of sharply lower turnout among minority
and working class voters, while turnout rose in wealthier neighborhoods
and among Christian fundamentalists. Largely black precincts in
north Denver saw a turnout of 35 percent, compared to 67 percent
citywide.
According to an organizer for the Progressive Coalition, a
low-income lobbying group, the Democratic campaign paid almost
no attention to low and moderate-income families. Theres
a continuing pattern of disrespect from the party toward low-income
people and people of color, he said. Referring to the unsuccessful
Democratic candidate for US Senate Tom Strickland, a wealthy corporate
lawyer, he added, It cant be just about one guy with
$6 million who hates his opponent. Thats not going to turn
people out to vote.
In California, where Democratic Governor Gray Davis was reelected,
the Democratic campaign did far worse than expected against a
candidate, Republican William Simon Jr., who virtually self-destructed.
(Simons investment firm was indicted during the summer for
falsifying its accounts, in the midst of the national scandals
over WorldCom, Global Crossing, Enron, etc.)
Turnout in the largest US state plunged to a record low of
36 percent, in what the Los Angeles Times called a mass
voter boycott prompted by the absence of substantive
debate. The Latino vote fell from 13 percent of the electorate
in 1998 to 10 percent, while the proportion of black voters fell
from 13 percent to only 4 percent. The total number of black and
Latino voters fell by 1,150,000 compared to 1998.
Davis had won an easy victory four years ago, but his vote
fell by 1.7 million while the Republican vote fell only 400,000,
significantly reducing his electoral margin. Among the issues
widely cited by commentators in the state was Daviss opposition
to three different bills banning racial profiling by state and
local police, one of which he vetoed.
While black voters showed their hostility to Davis by staying
home, Latino voters in part boycotted the vote and in part gave
their support to Green Party candidate Peter Camejo, who received
6 percent of the vote in Hispanic areas, his best showing.
See Also:
US midterm election: the meaning of the
Democratic debacle
[7 November 2002]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |