|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Indonesia
Trial of Islamic cleric accused of terrorism begins in Jakarta
By John Roberts
24 April 2003
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The trial of Islamic fundamentalist cleric Abu Bakar Bashir,
who has been charged with treason, opened in Jakarta yesterday.
The 90-minute hearing was held at a special courtroom in the Meteorological
and Geophysics Agency, which was ringed by 500 armed police backed
by water cannon. Everyone entering the court was searched.
Inside, a team of prosecutors read out the 25-page indictment,
which alleged that Bashir was the mastermind behind a treasonable
conspiracy aimed at toppling the government and establishing an
Islamic state. He is accused of approving terrorist attacks on
38 churches across Indonesia in December 2000, resulting in 19
deaths.
Bashir is also charged with having endorsed plans to attack
the US embassy in Singapore, immigration violations and giving
false statements to police. The latter charges refer to technical
irregularities relating to his 13-year-exile in Malaysia, where
he fled after being released from jail under the Suharto dictatorship,
and declarations made on his return to Indonesia in 1998.
Significantly, however, Bashir was not charged with involvement
in the Bali bombing last October 12, which claimed more than 200
lives and was the original reason for his arrest.
Prior to the brutal terrorist attack, the Indonesian government
had been under sustained pressure from the US, backed by Singapore
and Malaysia, to arrest Bashir, who allegedly headed Jemaah Islamiah
(JI), which is said to have links to Al Qaeda. Indonesian police
initially questioned the cleric and examined evidence from Malaysia
and Singapore but insisted that there was no basis for charging
him.
Immediately after Bali bombing, Indonesian President Megawati
Sukarnoputri came under even more intense pressure from Australia
and the US to detain Bashir and implement tough new measures to
detain terrorist suspects without charge. A lurid campaign in
the American, Australian and international media portrayed Bashir
and JI as part of an extensive terrorist network in South East
Asia that was responsible for the bombing.
On October 19, a week after the Bali attack, Megawati issued
a presidential security decree restoring anti-democratic powers
to the police, which they had lost after the fall of Suharto in
1998. Under the decree, police are permitted to detain people
for three days and then hold them for a further six monthsall
without chargeif a judge approves.
The following day, Bashir was arrested for questioning. He
was formally detained on November 1 and held by police for more
than four months before finally being charged on April 14. Yet
despite his police interrogation, and the arrest and alleged confession
of more than 20 people over the Bali bombing, Bashir has not been
charged with that crime. The whole process underscores the flimsy
character of the accusations made against him last year and the
political character of the trial underway.
Bashir publicly advocates the reactionary program of establishing
an Islamic state but has repeatedly denied any connection to terrorist
organisations. He and his supporters insist that he is being persecuted
on Washingtons orders. As he left the court yesterday, he
declared: I dont accept these charges, these are lies
from America.
Bashir is represented by a substantial team of lawyers. Adnan
Buyung Nasution, head of the defence team and also Indonesias
Legal Aid Foundation, told the media yesterday that the prosecution
would fail. The whole case is absurd. It is an engineered,
constructed case in order to support allegations by America, Britain
and Australia, he said.
Despite thousands of pages of evidence that prosecutors have
reportedly handed to the judicial authorities, no evidence has
been made public to substantiate the charges. Much of the case
against Bashir is based on evidence from alleged Al Qaeda suspects
who have been detained in custody, in some cases for over 12 months,
without charge, trial or public appearances.
The most important is Omar al-Faruq, who was arrested by Indonesian
authorities in June 2002 and secretly handed over to the CIA.
After three months of interrogation in Afghanistan, Faruq allegedly
broke down and provided detailed information about Al Qaeda and
JI operations in South East Asia. According to details leaked
to the press by the CIA, Faruq implicated Bashir as leader of
JI and in various terrorist plots.
However, neither Faruq, nor another key witness Faiz Abu Bakar
Bafana, in jail in Singapore, will appear in court. As a result
their claims will not be subject to defence cross-examination.
Bafar is alleged to be a senior JI leader who was connected to
a plot to bomb US facilities in Singapore. He, along with others
purportedly involved in the failed plan, has been held without
trial under Singapores notorious Internal Security Act (ISA),
which provides for indefinite detention without trial.
Most of the Singapore suspects have not been seen in public
since their arrest in late 2001 and early 2002 but the Singapore
government alleges that they acknowledge Bashir as their emir.
Singapore authorities have made available documents and videotapes
in an effort to substantiate the arrests but their authenticity
has not yet been tested in any court or public arena.
Similarly, Malaysian detaineesallegedly members of the
Kumpulan Mujahdin Malaysia (KMM)are being held without trial
under that countrys own Internal Security Act. Some commentators
have even questioned KMMs existence as an organisation.
When Indonesian police originally interviewed the detainees, they
concluded that their statements showed that Bashir preached Islamic
fundamentalism but not that he had any direct terrorist involvement.
The testimony of the Malaysian and Singapore detainees appears
to be central to the prosecution case. Indonesian police say that
some of the detainees will give evidence via video link. However
their long periods of confinement and police interrogation raise
serious doubts about the credibility of their evidence.
It is not possible to conclude on the basis of evidence available
so far if Bashir has been involved in planning terrorist attacks.
But there is no doubt that his detention and trial have been orchestrated
by the Megawati administration to convince Washington that Jakarta
is playing its part in the Bush administrations global
war on terrorism. Over the past week, Indonesian police
have rounded up another 18 terrorist suspectsthree
of whom are allegedly connected to the Bali bombing.
As far as the US is concerned, the crackdown on Islamic extremism
serves a broader purpose. Washington has been keen to cement closer
ties with the Indonesian military and intelligence apparatus as
a guarantee against growing social tensions and political instability.
For the past two years, the Bush administration has been seeking
to overturn a Congressional ban on US-Indonesian military contacts.
Since the September 11 terrorist attacks on the US, and particularly
since the Bali bombing, Washington has been able to renew relations
with the police, intelligence and military apparatus, on which
the US relied for three decades before the fall of the Suharto
junta.
For the Megawati administration a great deal is at stake in
the Bashir trial. A conviction will be regarded in Washington
as an important test of Jakartas dependability, with political
and economic ramifications for Indonesia. The trial, which will
involve at least 50 prosecution witnesses, is due to resume next
week and is predicted to take at least three months.
See Also:
Australian ABC falls
into line on Bali bombing
[22 November 2002]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |