|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
UK asylum policy faces criticism as Kurdish family is deported
By Niall Green
26 August 2003
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
The British governments treatment of families seeking
asylum has come under growing criticism following the widely reported
detention and deportation of a family of Kurdish immigrants.
Yurdurgal Ay and her four children were deported to Germany
earlier this month after being held for a year in a detention
centre for so-called failed immigrants. Now staying
in a centre near Frankfurt run by an evangelical church, the family
face removal to Turkey. Yurdurgals husband Salih had already
been sent back to Germany, where he was subsequently deported
to Istanbul. No word has been heard from him since.
Salih and Yurdurgal had fled Turkey 15 years ago. Their children,
Beriwan (14), Nerwoz (13), Dilowan (12) and Medya (8), have never
been to Turkey.
During their time in detention the Ays and their legal counsel
have repeatedly appealed against the British governments
decision to remove them from the country. But despite the clear
danger posed to them as Kurds should they be sent to Turkey, and
the fact that the children had been settled in English schools,
their request to remain in Britain was finally turned down by
the Court of Appeal.
The family hoped for a last chance to overturn the deportation
decision through an appeal to Britains highest court, the
House of Lords. At the end of July they were denied permission
to pursue their case.
The Home Office wasted little time, signing their deportation
papers and removing them from the country within days. The Ays
were transferred from the remote Dungavel detention centre in
Scotland where they had been incarcerated for over 12 months to
the Immigration Services Tinsley House accommodation near
Gatwick airport outside London. They were then flown to Germany
on a chartered flight.
Such was the Home Offices rush to get them out of Britain
that the family where dispatched without their medical and social
work files. It was left to their lawyer, Aamer Anwar, to arrange
for the documentation to be sent to Germany.
Speaking to journalists prior to deportation Beriwan, the eldest
of the four children, said, I thought Britain was a democratic
country where they looked after children because its their
duty to look after children. But its not.
Asked if she had a message for the government she replied:
Id say to the government Ive been here for one
year in a detention centre to fight my case... I cant go
back to Germany because they will send me to Turkey. I cant
go to Turkey. Id have to change my name because its
a Kurdish name, theres no education, theres persecution...
I cant go back.
On conditions in Britains detention centres, she said:
Everyone at Dungavel calls it a prison. Nobody calls it
a detention centre. Everybody calls it a prison because its
a prison with fences and barbed wires where children cant
go outside and have their freedoms and enjoy themselves. Detention
centres are very bad for their mental health.
The family had insisted that they would resist all efforts
to make them board the plane. However, following threats from
officials at Tinsley House that handcuffs and physical force would
be used if there were any resistance the Ays decided to go peacefully.
Once onboard the family was split up, with Yurdurgal and each
of her childrenwho had never flown beforeeach made
to sit between two security guards. Friends and supporters claimed
that the children were mentally unfit to make the journey. Thirteen
year-old Nerwoz has stopped eating and is showing visible signs
of stress.
The familys legal team said that it would continue the
battle to be granted asylum. Klemens Ross, a lawyer in Germany
has taken up their case. Pro Asyl, a German human rights organisation,
has also made contact with the Ays.
Karl Kopp, director of European affairs with Pro Asyl, commented
on the way the Ay family had been treated in Britain: We
are astonished and shocked that you have detained a family for
more than one year. I would say Germany is the most restrictive
country in Europe in terms of asylumthere is a lot of detention
and deportationbut still this could not have happened in
Germany. To detain children is incredible. We have the impression
that especially the children are traumatised after this horrible
year of detention.
Kopp warned that German immigration authorities could deport
the family to Turkey very soon. They are still facing the
threat of deportation. The only reason the German authorities
couldnt or didnt deport them immediately was because
they werent prepared.
Human rights activists and legal professionals, religious leaders,
and working people have expressed their disgust at the treatment
of families like the Ays. Thousands have signed petitions protesting
to the Home Office, written letters to their parliamentary representatives,
and sent messages of support to Mrs Ay and her children.
Sarah Parker from the Ay family campaign in Gravesend, Kent,
where the family had lived for three years, expressed the sadness
and distress felt by friends and supporters of the family in the
area. She said that the family had settled in well to the community
before being forcibly removed to a detention centre.
Several reports on the conditions inside Britains detention
centres have shown that government policy is causing enormous
suffering for asylum seekers, especially children. A report, newly
published by the prisons inspectorate on the Dungavel detention
centre criticised the lack of educational and recreational facilities
available to detainees. This comes on top of numerous published
findings by psychologists and childrens charities stating
that these centres cause great damage to the young people kept
there.
Professor Henry Zeitlin, a specialist in child and adolescent
psychiatry at University College London, met the Ay children earlier
this year. He concluded that their detention was potentially
very damaging. If they had been British children, he said,
their case would invoke issues of child protection.
Even sections of business fear that the assault on those looking
for asylum could have a negative impact and discourage immigration
needed by many industries and public services. The Sunday Herald
newspaper conducted a survey among religious, trades union and
business leaders in Scotland indicating a high level of disquiet
over the impact that detaining immigrant families could have on
Scotlands tourist reputation and the Scottish Executives
campaign to attract skilled overseas labour. The Sunday Herald
editorialised, It is right and proper and highly civilised
that Scotland should open its door to talented and skilled immigrants.
In a country with a fast declining population, our futures could
depend on them. By the same token it is equally right and proper
and just as civilised to speak out on a case as inhumane and wrong-headed
as the Ays.
Aware that the Dungavel centre is becoming a national disgrace
that threatens to hamper the areas economic interests, there
is growing pressure on the Scottish Executive to seek an arrangement
with the British Home Office whereby Dungavel is shut down or
substantially remodelled. Generally supportive of the governments
measures against immigrants, the press has sought to paint the
Ays as a tragic but unusual case. However, the isolation and mistreatment
of asylum seekers, a tactic at the heart of Labours attempts
to discourage desperate people from coming to the country, creates
a constant stream of similar cases. Approximately 50 children
and hundreds of adult asylum seekers are locked up in centres
across Britain at any one time.
See Also:
Britain: Asylum-seekers detained under
prison-like conditions
[7 August 2003]
British report details tremendous
obstacles facing asylum-seekers
[23 July 2003]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |