|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : The
UN
UN conceals Picassos Guernica for Powells
presentation
By David Walsh
8 February 2003
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email the
author
In an act with extraordinary historical resonance, United Nations
officials covered up a tapestry reproduction of Pablo Picassos
anti-war mural Guernica during US Secretary of State
Colin Powells February 5 presentation of the American case
for war against Iraq.
Picassos painting commemorates a small Basque village
bombed by German forces in April 1937 during the Spanish Civil
War. The painter, in desolate black, white and grey, depicts a
nightmarish scene of men, women, children and animals under bombardment.
The twisted, writhing forms include images of a screaming mother
holding a dead child, a corpse with wide-open eyes and a gored
horse. Art historian Herbert Read described the work as a
cry of outrage and horror amplified by a great genius.
The reproduction has hung outside the Security Council chamber
at UN headquarters in New York since its donation by the estate
of Nelson A. Rockefeller in 1985. As the council gathered to hear
Powell on Wednesday, workers placed a blue curtain and flags of
the councils member countries in front of the tapestry.
UN officials claimed that the cover-up was simply a matter
of creating a more effective backdrop for the television cameras.
When we do have large crowds we put the flags up and the
UN logo in front of the tapestry, asserted Stephane Dujarric.
New York Newsday, however, reported that Diplomats
at the United Nations, speaking on condition they not be named,
have been quoted in recent days telling journalists that they
believe the United States leaned on UN officials to cover the
tapestry, rather than have it in the background while Powell or
other US diplomats argued for war on Iraq.
The right-wing Washington Times was obliged to note:
Television cameras routinely pan the tapestry as diplomats
enter and leave the council chambers, and its muted browns and
taupes lend a poignant backdrop to the talking heads. So it was
a surprise for many of the envoys to arrive at U.N. headquarters
last Monday for a Security Council briefing by chief weapons inspectors,
only to find the searing work covered with a baby-blue banner
and the U.N. logo.
Further damaging Dujarrics claim, the Toronto
Stars art critic Peter Goddard wrote that the
coverup may have been prompted by UN realization that images of
the murals vivid anti-war message were televised world-wide
when it appeared as a backdrop to the Jan. 27 interim report by
chief weapons inspector Hans Blix.
A group of protesters held up copies of Picassos painting
outside the UN on Wednesday while Powell was making his warmongering
appeal.
Aside from its general evocation of anti-war sentiment, Picassos
painting threatened to speak to historical parallels that the
Bush administration and UN officials were clearly determined that
the media or the public should not make.
For an entire generation the bombing of Guernica and Picassos
interpretation of the event signified the barbarity of fascism
and the widespread determination to resist its violence and brutality.
The bombing of Guernica, by the German Luftwaffe in support
of Francisco Francos Nationalist army, was one of the first
opportunities for European fascism to reveal its murderous face.
German bombers launched an unprovoked attack on the Basque
village of 5,000 at 4:30 in the afternoon, the busiest hour of
a market day. According to one account, The streets were
jammed with townspeople and peasants from the countryside. Never
before in modern warfare had noncombatants been slaughtered in
such numbers, and by such means (Lael Wertenbaker, The
World of Picasso, 1967).
From 4:30 to 7:45 the squadron of German airplanes rained uncontested
bombs and gunfire on the village. Villagers who were not
immediately killed fled to the fields to take refuge, only to
be ravaged by plunging machine gun fighters (Thomas Gordon
and Max Morgan, Guernica: The Crucible of World War II,
1975).
One-third of the population of the village was either killed
or wounded. The fires that engulfed the city burned for three
days. Isolated farms as far away as four miles were bombed.
A survivor of the attack recounted, The air was alive
with the cries of the wounded. I saw a man crawling down the street,
dragging his broken legs.... Pieces of people and animals were
lying everywhere.... In the wreckage there was a young woman.
I could not take my eyes off her. Bones stuck through her dress.
Her head twisted right around her neck. She lay, mouth open, her
tongue hanging out. I vomited and lost consciousness (Gordon
and Morgan).
The bombing of Guernica had no strategic military significance.
It was an opportunity for the German militarywith the authorization
of Francoto test its powerful new air force. The killing
and maiming of 1,700 Spanish villagers was essentially done for
bombing practice. The raid also had the aim of intimidating and
terrorizing not simply the Spanish population, but any and all
of those who might oppose the fascist onslaught.
After news of the massacre had reached Paris, more than one
million people flooded the citys streets on May 1 to protest
the atrocity. Eyewitness accounts filled French newspapers. Stunned
and horrified by the black and white photographs of the bombings
devastation, Picasso quickly sketched the first images for the
Guernica mural. Three months later the painting was delivered
to the Spanish pavilion at the 1937 Worlds Fair in Paris.
Following the victory of Francos fascist army, with the
aid of Hitler and Mussolini, Picasso forbade the works display
in Spain until the country enjoyed public liberties and
democratic institutions. Guernica was returned
to Spain on October 25, 1981, on the centenary of the painters
birth.
See Also:
Powells UN speech triggers countdown
to war against Iraq
[6 February 2003]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |